The DOI matches its DataCite record; 86 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
As the capabilities of generative language models continue to advance, the implications of biases ingrained within these models have garnered increasing attention from researchers, practitioners, and the broader public. This article investigates the challenges and risks associated with biases in large-scale language models like ChatGPT. We discuss the origins of biases, stemming from, among others, the nature of training data, model specifications, algorithmic constraints, product design, and policy decisions. We explore the ethical concerns arising from the unintended consequences of biased model outputs. We further analyze the potential opportunities to mitigate biases, the inevitability of some biases, and the implications of deploying these models in various applications, such as virtual assistants, content generation, and chatbots. Finally, we review the current approaches to identify, quantify, and mitigate biases in language models, emphasizing the need for a multi-disciplinary, collaborative effort to develop more equitable, transparent, and responsible AI systems. This article aims to stimulate a thoughtful dialogue within the artificial intelligence community, encouraging researchers and developers to reflect on the role of biases in generative language models and the ongoing pursuit of ethical AI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, generative conversational AI may also expose users to undesirable consequences, such as biases, misinformation, and manipulation (Brandtzaeg, et al. , 2022; Ferrara, 2023).”
From Why do people use ChatGPT? Exploring user motivations for generative conversational AI (2024) · cites this paper as Ferrara, 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This may be particularly true if generative conversational AI lacks domain-specific knowledge and usable and transparent verification mechanisms, leading to unintended consequences of biased or misinformed model outputs (Ferrara, 2023).”
From Why do people use ChatGPT? Exploring user motivations for generative conversational AI (2024) · cites this paper as Ferrara, 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It is well-understood that models trained on human data - such as being pre-trained on human-written text or fine-tuned on human feedback - can exhibit human biases.”
From Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI (2025) · cites this paper as Ferrara, 2023
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These range from parroting harmful stereotypes and misconceptions about certain social groups (Bianchi et al. 2023;Ferrara 2023)”
From Epistemic Injustice in Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as Ferrara 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766
Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., & Liu, P. J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10683 · Cited by 10,929
Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347 · Cited by 10,625
Corsaro, W. A., & Bourdieu, P. (1992) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579985 · Cited by 9,968
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 · Cited by 4,611
LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M.-A., Lacroix, T., Rozière, B., Goyal, N., Hambro, E., Azhar, F., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13971 · Cited by 4,602
Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11903 · Cited by 4,263
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.02155 · Cited by 4,208
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- D.K. Citron and F. Pasquale, 2014. "The scored society: Due process for automated predictions," Washington Law Review, volume 89, number 1, pp. 1-33, and at https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol89/iss1/2/, accessed 27 October 2023.
- S. Dev and J.M. Phillips, 2019. "Attenuating bias in word vectors," Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 879-887, and at https://proceedings.mlr.press/v89/dev19a.html, accessed 27 October 2023.
- A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A.N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, 2017. "Attention is all you need," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30, at https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017, accessed 27 October 2023.
- B.L. Whorf, 1964. Language, thought, and reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Edited by John B. Carroll. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- R. Zellers, A. Holtzman, H. Rashkin, Y. Bisk, A. Farhadi, F. Roesner, and Y. Choi, 2019. "Defending against neural fake news," ANIPS'19: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, article number 812, pp. 9,054-9,065.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–376 of 376
Bruel, J., Gouaichault, T., Teste, O., Blay–Fornarino, M., Lacroix, N., Precioso, F., & Mosser, S. (2025) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) · doi:10.1109/rew66121.2025.00062
Baptista, J. P., Silva, D. C. D. C., Avdeenko, O., Capitaneanu, C., & Franco, A. (2025) · Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1186/s41935-025-00488-4
Vulnerability as a Shared Condition: Rethinking Empathy across Species and Circuits
Ajeesh, A. K. (2025) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-025-10280-7
Ahammed, A. S., Mukherjee, S., & Obermaisser, R. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY) · doi:10.1109/sisy67000.2025.11205391
Artificial Intelligence and Intelligence Analysis
Vogel, K. M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197783160.013.0023
Gyadu-Asiedu, N. A. A., Aigbavboa, C. O., & David, M. M. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-07992-3_16
The Psychological Risks of BCI-LLM Cognitive “Enhancement”
Tuskey, J. (2025) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-025-09621-5
Underviserrettet AI i sprogfagene
Møller, A. K., Bundgaard, K., & Rasmussen, M. L. R. (2025) · Sprogforum Tidsskrift for sprog- og kulturpædagogik · doi:10.7146/spr.v31i81.159169
Meta Querier: Revealing Gender Stereotypes in LLM
Haochen Zhang, W. G. (2025) · Computer Fraud & Security · doi:10.52710/cfs.423
Da hashtag à imagem: uma análise discursiva das trends do Tiktok em imagens geradas por IA
Gonçalves, L. F., Suyama, S., Gomes, S. D. A., & Vicentini, C. R. G. (2026) · Modapalavra e-periódico · doi:10.5965/1982615x19472026200
Human-AI collaboration in vocational writing: Building a framework for adaptive English learning
Çiçek, Ş. T., & Can, D. T. (2026) · Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning · doi:10.31681/jetol.1821890
The effect of prompt framing on AI-generated sentencing recommendations: a research note
Mesch, G. S. (2026) · Criminal Justice Studies · doi:10.1080/1478601x.2026.2624489
Investigating spatial-temporal bias of LLMs
Li, Z. (2026) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2026.131542 · Cited by 1
Investigating the Future of Cybersecurity Post-Gen-AI IntegrationPreprint
Foley, J. (2026) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.177031349.98180336/v1
MELF: Multi-Agent Evaluation for LLMs Fairness Based on Hierarchical Genetic Algorithm
Huang, H., Ma, C., & Li, Z. (2025) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing (MLNLP) · doi:10.1109/mlnlp66797.2025.11388881
A Luxembourgish Corpus as a Gender Bias Evaluation Testset
Anastasiou, D., Blond-Hanten, C., & Gallais, M. (2024) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/23s9yibwemgv
Measuring and Mitigating Gender Entropy Bias in Large Language Models
Prabhune, S., Padmanabhan, B., & Dutta, K. (2025) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw69685.2025.00272
Emergent Biases in Large Language Models: A Critical Review of Taxonomy and Evaluations
Ismail, S., & Aygün, R. S. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI) · doi:10.1109/cogmi67134.2025.00036
Kızıltoprak, N., Özkan, Ö. F., Cengız, F., Kamer, E., & Sücüllü, İ. (2026) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076261425149
HLPD: Aligning LLMs to Human Language Preference for Machine-Revised Text Detection
Fangqi, D., Jiang, X., & Deng, Z. (2026) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v40i36.40297
Future Concepts of Artificial Intelligence
ŞAHİN, H. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/406016
AI-Powered Fraud Detection in Financial Networks: A Systematic Literature Review.Preprint
Pochincharla, S., Lawson, J., Kabir, F., Wilson, D., & Sameer, M. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9267907/v1
Digitalidad justa: aproximaciones desde los Derechos Humanos
Guzmán-Rodríguez, D. E., Ochoa, V. L., & Pont, V. N. (2026) · Dejusticia eBooks · doi:10.51438/djguzman2026
Evaluating the Performance of Different AI Tools in Generating Contraception Recommendations
Cheong, S. C., Ng, B. K., Lim, P. S., Rajoo, P. A., & Wong, P. K. (2026) · Studies in big data · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18881-6_20
Gender biases in GPT-4 short biographies.
Cesare, A.-M. D. (2026) · Linguistik Online · doi:10.13092/tsh3js82
Fatima, K., Singh, P., Alagarsamy, R., Chaudhary, G. R., Kharbanda, O. P., Lal, B., & Barathi, A. (2026) · The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal · doi:10.1177/10556656261438912
Gökce, M., & Şen, M. K. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6325-7.ch006
Generative AI in Academic Publishing
Kumar, A., McKeown, D., Syed, H., Craig, C. J., Rupley, W. H., Ahmed, A., Kashwani, S., & Siddiqui, K. A. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/407619
Prompting for Teachability: Designing Novice Personas in LLMs for Learning by Teaching Contexts
Miller, S., & Bosch, N. (2026) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3785022.3785067
AI’s Type: Unintended Consequences of Using AI Generated Images in Political Science Research
Tillman, E. A., & Donlon, R. D. (2026) · Journal of Criminal Justice Education · doi:10.1080/10511253.2026.2660723
The Dark Side of Generative AI: A Cross‐Domain Systematic Investigation
Al-Hinai, Y. S., Tarhini, A., Aman, W., & Al-Sharafi, M. (2026) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/2320511 · Cited by 2
The Impact of LLMs on Software Development
Vasanthakumar, S., & Wickramarachchi, R. (2026) · International Research Conference on Smart Computing and Systems Engineering (SCSE) · doi:10.1109/scse70081.2026.11499962
Rizal, A. R. A., Kho, S. N., Kadir, S. A., & Nor, S. M. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9663795/v1
Nowacki, L., & Wrochna, A. E. (2026) · Communication Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/22041451.2026.2672876
Trillo-Domínguez, M., Olvera‐Lobo, M., & Martín-Neira, J.-I. (2026) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2026.1829451
An exploration of safety analytics for proactivity in workplace safety using large language models
Bayramova, A., Edwards, D. J., & Rillie, I. (2026) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-026-02842-7
Proxy Analysis in Bias Testing
Djennane, L., Kardkovács, Z. T., Benatallah, B., Gaci, Y., & Farah, Z. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-28117-3_15
Bernal, M. J. (2026) · International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique · doi:10.1007/s11196-026-10522-w
Huang, J., & Stone, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18443-6_10
Ethics in Artificial Intelligence: A Philosophical Exploration
Destari, D., Zahir, R., & Sukoco, H. (2025) · Journal of Humanities Research Sustainability · doi:10.70177/jhrs.v2i2.1939
Марченко, А. К., Чернявская, Н. Е., Кравец, О. С., Uliumdzhieva, G. S., & Адьянов, A. А. (2026) · Pedagogical Education · doi:10.62257/2712-9950-2026-7-6-225-233
Lee, H., Shin, J., Song, H., Ko, C., & Park, J. C. (2026) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.1741
For-Value: Efficient Forward-Only Data Valuation for finetuning LLMs and VLMs
Deng, W., Zeng, Q., Zhang, J., Chen, M., Ding, Z., Thrampoulidis, C., Gong, B., & Li, X. (2026) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.664
Guardian-as-an-Advisor: Advancing Next-Generation Guardian Models for Trustworthy LLMs
Huang, Y., Zhuang, H., Ye, J., Bao, H., Wang, Y., Hua, H., Wu, S., Chen, P.-Y., & Zhang, X. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.292
Exploring value concerns in social media issue reports: a human-LLM study of Bluesky and Mastodon
Mougouei, D., Azarnik, A., Mougouei, E., Pham, S. H., Kinchin, N., & Senewiratne, S. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2686827
Quality of AI vs human-generated single best answer questions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Shabbir, M., Bandy, A., Mehboob, B., Mahboob, U., Liaqat, A., Almarshad, F., & Adam, S. K. (2026) · Medicni perspektivi · doi:10.26641/2307-0404.2026.2.365915
Valentinelli, P. (2026) · AI-Linguistica Linguistic Studies on AI-Generated Texts and Discourses · doi:10.62408/ai-ling.v6i1.77
Mwambela, A., Katusi, G., Ngasongwa, H., & Hamidiyah, A. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10202777/v1
Enhancing bias detection in text classification models through high-quality diverse test cases
Djennane, L., Kardkovács, Z. T., Benatallah, B., Gaci, Y., Gaaloul, W., & Farah, Z. (2026) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2026.108253
Measuring Differential Responses: A Cross-Engine Audit of Generative AI Bias
Chernosky, J., & Halvarsson, E. M. (2026) · Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology · doi:10.28945/5805
Iarovoi, D., & Teh, P. L. (2026) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-34792-3_11
Liu, Y., Welton, L. L., Melton, G. B., Zhang, R., & Arsoniadis, E. G. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) · doi:10.1109/ichi69079.2026.00013
Vázquez, E., Verdugo, R. R. C., & Suárez, J. R. P. (2026) · Tendencias Sociales Revista de Sociología · doi:10.5944/ts.2026.49949
Zhang, H., Zhu, X., Liu, T., & Zhang, L. (2026) · Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy · doi:10.1063/5.0308980
Zhou, A., Ngo, N. D., Duy, L. K. N., Huang, Y., Wong, K.-S., Yu, H., & Nguyen, T. H. (2026) · ACS ES&T Air · doi:10.1021/acsestair.6c00152
Artificial Intelligence and the Loss of the ‘Writing Struggle’: Is Struggle Essential to Learning?
Desai, H. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-80686-243-620261003
Imagining and Enacting Futures: The Anticipatory Politics of Algorithmic Governance
Chan, N. K., Su, C. C., & Zhou, R. (2026) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.70249
Guillén-Yparrea, N., & García-López, I. M. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-37438-7_12
García-López, I. M., & Guillén-Yparrea, N. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-37438-7_8
Rabbani, S. S., Nisa, S., El-Tanani, M., & Rabbani, S. A. (2026) · Information · doi:10.3390/info17090899
Analysing Structures of Silence in AI-mediated Public Spheres
Hansen, E. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-026-01183-5
Möllenhoff, C., Uleberg, O., Bender, M., Neumuth, T., & Rockstroh, M. (2026) · Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13049-026-01695-1
Denny, P. C., Leinonen, J., Hellas, A., Sarsa, S., Liut, M., & Khosravi, H. (2026) · Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3828792.3828801
LLMs in Discourse Analysis and Production: A Systematic Review through the Lens of Appraisal Theory
Tzanoulinou, D., Triantafyllopoulos, L., Vorvilas, G., Paxinou, E., Kalles, D., & Verykios, V. S. (2026) · International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA) · doi:10.1109/iisa71656.2026.11705531
Alperen, A. V. C. I., & Demir, E. (2026) · KADEM Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.21798/kadem.2026.220
Hayoune, K. (2026) · Islamic Reports · doi:10.66638/fsavt586 · Cited by 1
Fehring, L., Frings, J., Rust, P., Kempny, C., Thürmann, P., Tamerler, E., & Meister, S. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.10.01.26364479
Kamali, J., & Javahery, P. (2026) · English language teaching · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-3961-0_6
AGENTIC AI SYSTEM FOR PTA ON THE N8N WORKFLOW AUTOMATION PLATFORM IN SMALL BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTS
(2026) · Issues in Information Systems · doi:10.48009/2_iis_2026_107
Kelly, L. C., Istratoaie, A., Dowling, L. J., & Ward, S. A. (2026) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-025-10530-8
GenAI utilization and the cognitive outsourcing paradox in library and information science
Kyprianos, K., & Moustakas, G. (2026) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/09610006261493523
Von Large Language Models (LLMs) zu Understanding Models (UMs)
Forthmann, J., & Seebacher, U. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-52150-9_9
Stygmatyzacja urasawiająca w polskojęzycznych dużych modelach językowych: GPT i PLLuM
Ohia-Nowak, M. A. (2026) · Studia Medioznawcze · doi:10.33077/uw.24511617.sm.2026.3.921
Wage Disparities and Gender Gap in STEM Fields – Investigating the Long-term Impact with AI
Malhotra, A. (2026) · International Journal of Finance Economics and Management Studies · doi:10.64137/31080030/ijfems-v2i3p110
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferrara, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ferrara, Emilio
- ORCID
- Ferrara, Emilio
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 1396-0458 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2304.03738
- OpenAlex
- W4388488349
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 55
- FWCI
- 70.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- First Monday (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- First Monday (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, algorithmic bias, bias mitigation, training data bias, ethical AI, generative AI risks, chatbots, virtual assistants, content creation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
