The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Learning to Tokenize for Generative Retrieval
Open accessAbstract
Conventional document retrieval techniques are mainly based on the index-retrieve paradigm. It is challenging to optimize pipelines based on this paradigm in an end-to-end manner. As an alternative, generative retrieval represents documents as identifiers (docid) and retrieves documents by generating docids, enabling end-to-end modeling of document retrieval tasks. However, it is an open question how one should define the document identifiers. Current approaches to the task of defining document identifiers rely on fixed rule-based docids, such as the title of a document or the result of clustering BERT embeddings, which often fail to capture the complete semantic information of a document. We propose GenRet, a document tokenization learning method to address the challenge of defining document identifiers for generative retrieval. GenRet learns to tokenize documents into short discrete representations (i.e., docids) via a discrete auto-encoding approach. Three components are included in GenRet: (i) a tokenization model that produces docids for documents; (ii) a reconstruction model that learns to reconstruct a document based on a docid; and (iii) a sequence-to-sequence retrieval model that generates relevant document identifiers directly for a designated query. By using an auto-encoding framework, GenRet learns semantic docids in a fully end-to-end manner. We also develop a progressive training scheme to capture the autoregressive nature of docids and to stabilize training. We conduct experiments on the NQ320K, MS MARCO, and BEIR datasets to assess the effectiveness of GenRet. GenRet establishes the new state-of-the-art on the NQ320K dataset. Especially, compared to generative retrieval baselines, GenRet can achieve significant improvements on the unseen documents. GenRet also outperforms comparable baselines on MS MARCO and BEIR, demonstrating the method's generalizability.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DSI and its variations train pretrained language models on the target corpus and treat the model's parameters as an index of the corpus.
“For instance, DSI and its variations [134-137] have tried to train pretrained language models on the target corpus directly and then treat the model's parameter as a 'index' of the corpus.”
From Foundations of GenIR (2025) · cites this paper as [137]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrieval
Li, X., Jin, J., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, P., Zhu, Y., & Dou, Z. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3722552 · Cited by 172
Recent Advances in Generative Information Retrieval
Tang, Y., Zhang, R., Guo, J., & de Rijke, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval in the Asia Pacific Region · doi:10.1145/3624918.3629547 · Cited by 22
Self-citationAi, Q., Zhan, J., & Liu, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.02842
“For instance, DSI and its variations [134–137] have tried to train pretrained language models on the target corpus directly and then treat the model’s parameter as a “index” of the corpus.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, W., Yan, L., Chen, Z., Wang, S., Zhu, H., Ren, P., Chen, Z., Yin, D., de Rijke, M., & Ren, Z.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 46345-46361
- ISSN
- 1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2304.04171
- OpenAlex
- W7133207351
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 9.20
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Shandong University
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61972234, 62102234, 62272274, 62202271, 62072279)
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWA.1389.20.183)
- China Scholarship Council
- Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021QF129, ZR2022QF004)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- tokenization, generative retrieval, text retrieval
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review