PreprintCited by 95Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

A Billion-scale Foundation Model for Remote Sensing Images

Open access
Cha, Keumgang, Seo, Junghoon, Lee, Taekyung·2023·arXiv

Abstract

As the potential of foundation models in visual tasks has garnered significant attention, pretraining these models before downstream tasks has become a crucial step. The three key factors in pretraining foundation models are the pretraining method, the size of the pretraining dataset, and the number of model parameters. Recently, research in the remote sensing field has focused primarily on the pretraining method and the size of the dataset, with limited emphasis on the number of model parameters. This paper addresses this gap by examining the effect of increasing the number of model parameters on the performance of foundation models in downstream tasks such as rotated object detection and semantic segmentation. We pretrained foundation models with varying numbers of parameters, including 86M, 605.26M, 1.3B, and 2.4B, to determine whether performance in downstream tasks improved with an increase in parameters. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first billion-scale foundation model in the remote sensing field. Furthermore, we propose an effective method for scaling up and fine-tuning a vision transformer in the remote sensing field. To evaluate general performance in downstream tasks, we employed the DOTA v2.0 and DIOR-R benchmark datasets for rotated object detection, and the Potsdam and LoveDA datasets for semantic segmentation. Experimental results demonstrated that, across all benchmark datasets and downstream tasks, the performance of the foundation models and data efficiency improved as the number of parameters increased. Moreover, our models achieve the state-of-the-art performance on several datasets including DIOR-R, Postdam, and LoveDA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2304.05215

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing foundation models for remote sensing focus on aerial images from benchmark datasets that target object detection tasks and are limited to visible bands, disregarding the geospatial, multispectral, and temporal nature of satellite imagery, making them unsuitable for large scale Earth observation tasks.

    “These models, however, focus on aerial images from benchmark datasets that target object detection tasks and are limited to the visible bands (red, green, and blue). Thus, these models disregard the geospatial, multispectral, and temporal nature of satellite imagery, making them unsuitable for large scale Earth observation tasks.”

    From Foundation Models for Generalist Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [10]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The billion-scale GeoAI foundation model is not open-sourced, so its adaptability in different domain tasks is difficult to assess.

    “However, the model is not open-sourced; therefore, its adaptability in different domain tasks is difficult to assess.”

    From Assessment of a new GeoAI foundation model for flood inundation mapping (2023) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Methods (p. 6) describe adapting the model for rotated object detection and semantic segmentation, and the paper reports evaluations on those tasks. But the passages found when searching for open-source code, released weights, and model availability do not say whether this model was open-sourced or whether its availability makes assessment across other domain tasks difficult. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1][1] X. X. Zhu, D. Tuia, L. Mou, G.-S. Xia, L. Zhang, F. Xu, and F. Fraundorfer, "Deep learning in remote sensing: A comprehensive review and list of resources," IEEE geoscience and remote sensing magazine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 8–36, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cha, K., Seo, J., & Lee, T.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
Volume
19
Pages
16363-16378
ISSN
1939-1404 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396982199
Cited by
95
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 6
FWCI
12.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
remote sensing images, foundation models, vision transformer, model parameter scaling, pre-training, rotated object detection, semantic segmentation, fine-tuning, data efficiency, Potsdam

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review