A Billion-scale Foundation Model for Remote Sensing Images
Open accessAbstract
As the potential of foundation models in visual tasks has garnered significant attention, pretraining these models before downstream tasks has become a crucial step. The three key factors in pretraining foundation models are the pretraining method, the size of the pretraining dataset, and the number of model parameters. Recently, research in the remote sensing field has focused primarily on the pretraining method and the size of the dataset, with limited emphasis on the number of model parameters. This paper addresses this gap by examining the effect of increasing the number of model parameters on the performance of foundation models in downstream tasks such as rotated object detection and semantic segmentation. We pretrained foundation models with varying numbers of parameters, including 86M, 605.26M, 1.3B, and 2.4B, to determine whether performance in downstream tasks improved with an increase in parameters. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first billion-scale foundation model in the remote sensing field. Furthermore, we propose an effective method for scaling up and fine-tuning a vision transformer in the remote sensing field. To evaluate general performance in downstream tasks, we employed the DOTA v2.0 and DIOR-R benchmark datasets for rotated object detection, and the Potsdam and LoveDA datasets for semantic segmentation. Experimental results demonstrated that, across all benchmark datasets and downstream tasks, the performance of the foundation models and data efficiency improved as the number of parameters increased. Moreover, our models achieve the state-of-the-art performance on several datasets including DIOR-R, Postdam, and LoveDA.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing foundation models for remote sensing focus on aerial images from benchmark datasets that target object detection tasks and are limited to visible bands, disregarding the geospatial, multispectral, and temporal nature of satellite imagery, making them unsuitable for large scale Earth observation tasks.
“These models, however, focus on aerial images from benchmark datasets that target object detection tasks and are limited to the visible bands (red, green, and blue). Thus, these models disregard the geospatial, multispectral, and temporal nature of satellite imagery, making them unsuitable for large scale Earth observation tasks.”
From Foundation Models for Generalist Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [10]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe billion-scale GeoAI foundation model is not open-sourced, so its adaptability in different domain tasks is difficult to assess.
“However, the model is not open-sourced; therefore, its adaptability in different domain tasks is difficult to assess.”
From Assessment of a new GeoAI foundation model for flood inundation mapping (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
The Methods (p. 6) describe adapting the model for rotated object detection and semantic segmentation, and the paper reports evaluations on those tasks. But the passages found when searching for open-source code, released weights, and model availability do not say whether this model was open-sourced or whether its availability makes assessment across other domain tasks difficult. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [1][1] X. X. Zhu, D. Tuia, L. Mou, G.-S. Xia, L. Zhang, F. Xu, and F. Fraundorfer, "Deep learning in remote sensing: A comprehensive review and list of resources," IEEE geoscience and remote sensing magazine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 8–36, 2017.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessment of a new GeoAI foundation model for flood inundation mapping
Li, W., Lee, H., Wang, S., Hsu, C.-Y., & Arundel, S. T. (2023) · Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on AI for Geographic Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1145/3615886.3627747 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Neural Plasticity-Inspired Multimodal Foundation Model for Earth Observation
Xiong, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, F., Stewart, A. J., Hanna, J., Borth, D., Papoutsis, I., Saux, B. L., Camps-Valls, G., & Zhu, X. X. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.15356 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Foundation Models for Generalist Geospatial Artificial Intelligence
Jakubik, J., Roy, S., Phillips, C. E., Fraccaro, P., Godwin, D., Zadrozny, B., Szwarcman, D., Gomes, C., Nyirjesy, G., Edwards, B., et al. (2023) · arXiv · Cited by 157 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cha, K., Seo, J., & Lee, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 19
- Pages
- 16363-16378
- ISSN
- 1939-1404 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2304.05215
- OpenAlex
- W4396982199
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 12.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- remote sensing images, foundation models, vision transformer, model parameter scaling, pre-training, rotated object detection, semantic segmentation, fine-tuning, data efficiency, Potsdam
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review