The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.
High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral atom quantum computer
Open accessAbstract
The ability to perform entangling quantum operations with low error rates in a scalable fashion is a central element of useful quantum information processing. Neutral atom arrays have recently emerged as a promising quantum computing platform, featuring coherent control over hundreds of qubits and any-to-any gate connectivity in a flexible, dynamically reconfigurable architecture. The major outstanding challenge has been to reduce errors in entangling operations mediated through Rydberg interactions. Here we report the realization of two-qubit entangling gates with 99.5% fidelity on up to 60 atoms in parallel, surpassing the surface code threshold for error correction. Our method employs fast single-pulse gates based on optimal control, atomic dark states to reduce scattering, and improvements to Rydberg excitation and atom cooling. We benchmark fidelity using several methods based on repeated gate applications, characterize the physical error sources, and outline future improvements. Finally, we generalize our method to design entangling gates involving a higher number of qubits, which we demonstrate by realizing low-error three-qubit gates. By enabling high-fidelity operation in a scalable, highly connected system, these advances lay the groundwork for large-scale implementation of quantum algorithms, error-corrected circuits, and digital simulations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The highest demonstrated two-qubit gate fidelity is approximately 0.995.
“the highest demonstrated fidelity is ∼0.995 [42].”
From Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [42]
2-qubit gate fidelity for neutral atom quantum computers is 0.955-0.995.
“0.955-0.995 [22, 38, 42]”
From Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 107 · Cited by 526
Metadata
- Authors
- Evered, S. J., Bluvstein, D., Kalinowski, M., Ebadi, S., Manovitz, T., Zhou, H., Li, S. H., Geim, A. A., Wang, T. T., Maskara, N., Levine, H., Semeghini, G., Greiner, M., Vuletic, V., & Lukin, M. D.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lukin, Mikhail D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 622
- Issue
- 7982
- Pages
- 268-272
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2304.05420
- PMC
- PMC10567572
- OpenAlex
- W4387542025
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 135 · 2025: 229 · 2024: 139 · 2023: 23
- FWCI
- 60.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- FIU - Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion)
- Florida International University Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1745303, W911NF-20-1-0082)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0021013, DESC0021110, 7568717)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (W911NF2010021)
- National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate
- Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (W911NF2010082)
- Center for Ultracold Atoms, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Army Research Office (W911NF-20-1-0082, W911NF)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- neutral atom quantum computing, entangling gates, Rydberg interactions, gate fidelity, three-qubit gates, optimal control, dark states, atom cooling, Rydberg excitation, error sources, scalable quantum hardware
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review