The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.
Spacetime codes of Clifford circuits
Open accessAbstract
We propose a scheme for detecting and correcting faults in any Clifford circuit. The scheme is based on the observation that the set of all possible outcome bit-strings of a Clifford circuit is a linear code, which we call the outcome code. From the outcome code we construct a corresponding stabilizer code, the spacetime code. Our construction extends the circuit-to-code construction of Bacon, Flammia, Harrow and Shi [2], revisited recently by Gottesman [16], to include intermediate and multi-qubit measurements. With this correspondence, we reduce the problem of correcting faults in a circuit to the well-studied problem of correcting errors in a stabilizer code. More precisely, a most likely error decoder for the spacetime code can be transformed into a most likely fault decoder for the circuit. We give efficient algorithms to construct the outcome and spacetime codes. We also identify conditions under which these codes are LDPC, and give an algorithm to generate low-weight checks, which can then be combined with effcient LDPC code decoders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The correlated decoding procedure can generically be applied to any stabilizer codes and Clifford circuits.
“For a given logical circuit, our correlated decoding procedure generates a decoding hypergraph, which we then solve using most likely error methods, which is done here for both surface-code and colour-code experiments, and can generically be applied to any stabilizer codes and Clifford circuits79.”
From Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays (2024) · cites this paper as [79]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 10
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Scott Aaronson and Daniel Gottesman. Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits. Physical Review A, 70(5):052328, 2004.
- Dave Bacon, Steven T Flammia, Aram W Harrow, and Jonathan Shi. Sparse quantum codes from quantum circuits. In Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 327-334, 2015.
- Elwyn Berlekamp, Robert McEliece, and Henk Van Tilborg. On the inherent intractability of certain coding problems (corresp.). IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 24(3):384-386, 1978.
- Hector Bombin and Miguel Angel Martin-Delgado. Topological quantum distillation. Physical review letters, 97(18):180501, 2006.
- Sergey Bravyi and Jeongwan Haah. Quantum self-correction in the 3d cubic code model. Physical review letters, 111(20):200501, 2013.
- Sergey Bravyi and Alexei Kitaev. Universal quantum computation with ideal clifford gates and noisy ancillas. Physical Review A, 71(2):022316, 2005.
- Nicolas Delfosse, Vivien Londe, and Michael E Beverland. Toward a union-find decoder for quantum ldpc codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2022.
- Eric Dennis, Alexei Kitaev, Andrew Landahl, and John Preskill. Topological quantum memory. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 43(9):4452-4505, 2002.
- Austin G Fowler, Matteo Mariantoni, John M Martinis, and Andrew N Cleland. Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation. Physical Review A, 86(3):032324, 2012.
- Robert Gallager. Low-density parity-check codes. IRE Transactions on information theory, 8(1):21-28, 1962.
- Craig Gidney. A pair measurement surface code on pentagons. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.12780, 2022. · arXiv
- Daniel Gottesman. The heisenberg representation of quantum computers. arXiv preprint quant-ph/9807006, 1998. · arXiv
- Pavithran Iyer and David Poulin. Hardness of decoding quantum stabilizer codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 61(9):5209-5223, 2015.
- Matt McEwen, Dave Bacon, and Craig Gidney. Relaxing hardware requirements for surface code circuits using time-dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02192, 2023. · arXiv
- Matthew J Reagor, Thomas C Bohdanowicz, David Rodriguez Perez, Eyob A Sete, and William J Zeng. Hardware optimized parity check gates for superconducting surface codes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.06382, 2022. · arXiv
- Joschka Roffe, David R. White, Simon Burton, and Earl Campbell. Decoding across the quantum low-density parity-check code landscape. Physical Review Research, 2(4), Dec 2020.
Metadata
- Authors
- Delfosse, N., & Paetznick, A.
- Affiliations
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2304.05943
- OpenAlex
- W4365456851
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Coding theory and cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- Clifford circuits, stabilizer codes, fault detection and correction, intermediate measurements, LDPC codes, quantum error correction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
