The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Bridging graph data models: RDF, RDF-star, and property graphs as directed acyclic graphs
Abstract
Graph database users today face a choice between two technology stacks: the Resource Description Framework (RDF), on one side, is a data model with built-in semantics that was originally developed by the W3C to exchange interconnected data on the Web; on the other side, Labeled Property Graphs (LPGs) are geared towards efficient graph processing and have strong roots in developer and engineering communities. The two models look at graphs from different abstraction layers (triples in RDF vs. edges connecting vertices with inlined properties in LPGs), expose - at least at the surface - distinct features, come with different query languages, and are embedded into their own software ecosystems. In this short paper, we introduce a novel unifying graph data model called Statement Graphs, which combines the traits of both RDF and LPG and achieves interoperability at different levels: it (a) provides the ability to manage RDF and LPG data as a single, interconnected graph, (b) supports querying over the integrated graph using any RDF or LPG query language, while (c) clearing the way for graph stack independent data exchange mechanisms and formats. We formalize our new model as directed acyclic graphs and sketch a system of bidirectional mappings between RDF, LPGs, and Statement Graphs. Our mappings implicitly define read query semantics for RDF and LPGs query languages over the unified data model, thus providing graph users with the flexibility to use the query language of their choice for their graph use cases. As a proof of concept for our ideas, we also present the 1G Playground; an in-memory DBMS built on the concepts of Statement Graphs, which facilitates storage of both RDF and LPG data, and allows for cross-model querying using both SPARQL and Gremlin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Metadata
- Authors
- Gelling, E., Fletcher, G., & Schmidt, M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- arXiv
- 2304.13097
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bridging graph data models: RDF, RDF-star, and property graphs as directed acyclic graphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2304.13097
- The paper
- Gelling, E., Fletcher, G., & Schmidt, M. (2023). Bridging graph data models: RDF, RDF-star, and property graphs as directed acyclic graphs. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2304.13097
