The DOI matches its DataCite record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards Generalist Robots: A Promising Paradigm via Generative Simulation
Abstract
This document serves as a position paper that outlines the authors' vision for a potential pathway towards generalist robots. The purpose of this document is to share the excitement of the authors with the community and highlight a promising research direction in robotics and AI. The authors believe the proposed paradigm is a feasible path towards accomplishing the long-standing goal of robotics research: deploying robots, or embodied AI agents more broadly, in various non-factory real-world settings to perform diverse tasks. This document presents a specific idea for mining knowledge in the latest large-scale foundation models for robotics research. Instead of directly using or adapting these models to produce low-level policies and actions, it advocates for a fully automated generative pipeline (termed as generative simulation), which uses these models to generate diversified tasks, scenes and training supervisions at scale, thereby scaling up low-level skill learning and ultimately leading to a foundation model for robotics that empowers generalist robots. The authors are actively pursuing this direction, but in the meantime, they recognize that the ambitious goal of building generalist robots with large-scale policy training demands significant resources such as computing power and hardware, and research groups in academia alone may face severe resource constraints in implementing the entire vision. Therefore, the authors believe sharing their thoughts at this early stage could foster discussions, attract interest towards the proposed pathway and related topics from industry groups, and potentially spur significant technical advancements in the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent works scaling task generation with LLMs tend to focus on single-agent tasks with relatively short horizons.
“However, these works tend to focus on single-agent tasks that span relatively short horizons, while we consider long-horizon, multi-agent problems.”
From PARTNR: A Benchmark for Planning and Reasoning in Embodied Multi-agent Tasks (2024) · cites this paper as Xian et al., 2023
LLM-based task generation in prior work is not grounded beyond user-created in-context prompts.
“While LLM-based task generation has been studied in literature before (Katara et al., 2023;Wang et al., 2024;Xian et al., 2023;Nasiriany et al., 2024), these generations are not grounded beyond user-created in-context prompts.”
From PARTNR: A Benchmark for Planning and Reasoning in Embodied Multi-agent Tasks (2024) · cites this paper as Xian et al., 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M.-A., Lacroix, T., Rozière, B., Goyal, N., Hambro, E., Azhar, F., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13971 · Cited by 4,602
Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools
Schick, T., Dwivedi-Yu, J., Dessì, R., Raileanu, R., Lomeli, M., Zettlemoyer, L., Cancedda, N., & Scialom, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.04761 · Cited by 1,150
Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models
Huang, W., Xia, F., Xiao, T., Chan, H., Liang, J., Florence, P., Zeng, A., Tompson, J., Mordatch, I., Chebotar, Y., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.05608 · Cited by 287 · cited 2×
“…in large model training, many ongoing research works in robotics is making efforts to leverage large multimodal models to generate robotics policies via different manners, such as code generation [45, 103], data augmentation via visual imagination [115, 13], sub-task planning [33, 1, 46, 38].”
BackgroundNavigating to objects in the real world
Gervet, T., Chintala, S., Batra, D., Malik, J., & Chaplot, D. S. (2023) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.adf6991 · Cited by 125
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
PARTNR: A Benchmark for Planning and Reasoning in Embodied Multi-agent Tasks
Chang, M., Chhablani, G., Clegg, A., Cote, M. D., Desai, R., Hlavac, M., Karashchuk, V., Krantz, J., Mottaghi, R., Parashar, P., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.00081
Metadata
- Authors
- Xian, Z., Gervet, T., Xu, Z., Qiao, Y.-L., Wang, T.-H., & Wang, Y.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- arXiv
- 2305.10455
- References
- 5
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review