The DOI matches its DataCite record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
X-IQE: eXplainable Image Quality Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generation with Visual Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
This paper introduces a novel explainable image quality evaluation approach called X-IQE, which leverages visual large language models (LLMs) to evaluate text-to-image generation methods by generating textual explanations. X-IQE utilizes a hierarchical Chain of Thought (CoT) to enable MiniGPT-4 to produce self-consistent, unbiased texts that are highly correlated with human evaluation. It offers several advantages, including the ability to distinguish between real and generated images, evaluate text-image alignment, and assess image aesthetics without requiring model training or fine-tuning. X-IQE is more cost-effective and efficient compared to human evaluation, while significantly enhancing the transparency and explainability of deep image quality evaluation models. We validate the effectiveness of our method as a benchmark using images generated by prevalent diffusion models. X-IQE demonstrates similar performance to state-of-the-art (SOTA) evaluation methods on COCO Caption, while overcoming the limitations of previous evaluation models on DrawBench, particularly in handling ambiguous generation prompts and text recognition in generated images. Project website: https://github.com/Schuture/Benchmarking-Awesome-Diffusion-Models
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, X-IQE (Chen et al., 2023) leverages MiniGPT-4 (Zhu et al., 2024) with prompts prepared with the help of art professionals to evaluate the fidelity, alignment, and aesthetics of the generated images.”
From Deepfake: definitions, performance metrics and standards, datasets, and a meta-review (2024) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2023
In the citing paper
“ISO/IEC AWI (Approved Work Item) TS (Technical Specifications) 5,471 “Artificial intelligence—Quality evaluation guidelines for AI systems”13”
From Deepfake: definitions, performance metrics and standards, datasets, and a meta-review (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M.-A., Lacroix, T., Rozière, B., Goyal, N., Hambro, E., Azhar, F., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13971 · Cited by 4,602
Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations
Song, Y., Sohl-Dickstein, J., Kingma, D. P., Kumar, A., Ermon, S., & Poole, B. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.13456 · Cited by 1,953
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deepfake: definitions, performance metrics and standards, datasets, and a meta-review
Altuncu, E., Franqueira, V. N. L., & Li, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2024.1400024 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y., Liu, L., & Ding, C.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Yixiong
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2305.10843
- OpenAlex
- W4377130976
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- image quality assessment, text-to-image generation, explainable evaluation, chain-of-thought prompting, image-text alignment, image aesthetics, diffusion models, benchmarking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: X-IQE: eXplainable Image Quality Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generation with Visual Large Language Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2305.10843
- The paper
- Chen, Y., Liu, L., & Ding, C. (2023). X-IQE: eXplainable Image Quality Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generation with Visual Large Language Models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2305.10843