PreprintCited by 189Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsSpeech and dialogue systemsSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

SpeechGPT: Empowering Large Language Models with Intrinsic Cross-Modal Conversational Abilities

Open access
Zhang, Dong, Li, Shimin, Zhang, Xin, Zhan, Jun, Wang, Pengyu, Zhou, Yaqian, Qiu, Xipeng·2023·arXiv

Abstract

Multi-modal large language models are regarded as a crucial step towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and have garnered significant interest with the emergence of ChatGPT. However, current speech-language models typically adopt the cascade paradigm, preventing inter-modal knowledge transfer. In this paper, we propose SpeechGPT, a large language model with intrinsic cross-modal conversational abilities, capable of perceiving and generating multi-model content. With discrete speech representations, we first construct SpeechInstruct, a large-scale cross-modal speech instruction dataset. Additionally, we employ a three-stage training strategy that includes modality-adaptation pre-training, cross-modal instruction fine-tuning, and chain-of-modality instruction fine-tuning. The experimental results demonstrate that SpeechGPT has an impressive capacity to follow multi-modal human instructions and highlight the potential of handling multiple modalities with one model. Demos are shown in https://0nutation.github.io/SpeechGPT.github.io/.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2305.11000

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing speech-language and audio-language models primarily focus on speech-text conversion, spoken dialogue, or speech generation rather than unified understanding of speech, music, and general audio.

    “These works demonstrate the feasibility of bringing speech into language-model-style generation and interaction, but their primary focus is speech-text conversion, spoken dialogue, or speech generation rather than unified understanding of speech, music, and general audio.”

    From MOSS-Audio Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Introduction describes prior speech-language systems as using ASR/TTS pipelines or generating speech, and the Generative Spoken Language Model section describes work on speech synthesis and speech conversations. Those passages support the claimed focus on speech, but they do not establish the broader comparison with unified understanding of speech, music, and general audio; the paper also says Audio-GPT processes complex audio information. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Training a large language model as an automatic speech recognizer can be very expensive but the benefit is unclear.

    “training a large language model as an automatic speech recognizer (ASR) can be very expensive but the benefit is unclear [14]”

    From Joint Audio and Speech Understanding (2023) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Generative Spoken Language Model section says systems that combine LLMs with separate ASR and TTS models demand extensive resources. It does not say that training an LLM as an ASR system is expensive or that the benefit of doing so is unclear. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Other recent audio LLMs primarily focus on only speech.

    “Other recent audio LLMs [11,12,13,14] primarily focus on only speech.”

    From Joint Audio and Speech Understanding (2023) · cites this paper as [14]

  • Because LTU-AS has an internal Whisper model feeding transcribed text to LLaMA, the ASR task is no more than an identity mapping for LTU-AS, which is fundamentally different from SpeechGPT.

    “Note that since LTU-AS has an internal Whisper model feeding the transcribed text to LLaMA, the ASR task is no more than an identity mapping for LTU-AS, which is fundamentally different from SpeechGPT [14].”

    From Joint Audio and Speech Understanding (2023) · cites this paper as [14]

  • The HCI community has explored the application of LLMs for various healthcare practices such as mental health support, health information seeking, and public health interventions.

    “The HCI community has explored the application of LLMs for various healthcare practices, such as mental health support [66,68], health information seeking [81,117,128], and public health interventions [58]”

    From Talk2Care: An LLM-based Voice Assistant for Communication between Healthcare Providers and Older Adults (2024) · cites this paper as [128]

    The Introduction and Related Work discuss multimodal LLMs and speech interaction, while §5.3 evaluates cross-modal instruction following. Searches for healthcare, mental health support, health information seeking, and public health interventions found no passage in our copy addressing those applications or the HCI community’s work on them. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Rosana Ardila, Megan Branson, Kelly Davis, Michael Henretty, Michael Kohler, Josh Meyer, Reuben Morais, Lindsay Saunders, Francis M. Tyers, and Gregor Weber. 2020. Common voice: A massively- multilingual speech corpus.
  2. Alexei Baevski, Yuhao Zhou, Abdelrahman Mohamed, and Michael Auli. 2020. wav2vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech representations. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:12449-12460.
  3. Xuxin Cheng, Bowen Cao, Qichen Ye, Zhihong Zhu, Hongxiang Li, and Yuexian Zou. 2023a. Ml-lmcl: Mutual learning and large-margin contrastive learn- ing for improving asr robustness in spoken language understanding. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 6492- 6505.
  4. Xuxin Cheng, Qianqian Dong, Fengpeng Yue, Tom Ko, Mingxuan Wang, and Yuexian Zou. 2023b. M 3 st: Mix at three levels for speech translation. In ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acous- tics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 1-5. IEEE.
  5. Xuxin Cheng, Zhihong Zhu, Ziyu Yao, Hongxiang Li, Yaowei Li, and Yuexian Zou. 2023c. GhostT5: Gen- erate More Features with Cheap Operations to Im- prove Textless Spoken Question Answering. In Proc. INTERSPEECH 2023, pages 1134-1138. · DOI
  6. Danny Driess, Fei Xia, Mehdi SM Sajjadi, Corey Lynch, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Brian Ichter, Ayzaan Wahid, Jonathan Tompson, Quan Vuong, Tianhe Yu, et al. 2023. Palm-e: An embodied multimodal language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03378. · arXiv
  7. Wei-Ning Hsu, Benjamin Bolte, Yao-Hung Hubert Tsai, Kushal Lakhotia, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Abdel- rahman Mohamed. 2021. Hubert: Self-supervised speech representation learning by masked prediction of hidden units. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 29:3451-3460.
  8. J. Kahn, M. Riviere, W. Zheng, E. Kharitonov, Q. Xu, P.E. Mazare, J. Karadayi, V. Liptchinsky, R. Col- lobert, C. Fuegen, T. Likhomanenko, G. Synnaeve, A. Joulin, A. Mohamed, and E. Dupoux. 2020. Libri- light: A benchmark for ASR with limited or no super- vision. In ICASSP 2020 -2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Process- ing (ICASSP). IEEE. · DOI
  9. Kushal Lakhotia, Eugene Kharitonov, Wei-Ning Hsu, Yossi Adi, Adam Polyak, Benjamin Bolte, Tu-Anh Nguyen, Jade Copet, Alexei Baevski, Abdelrahman Mohamed, et al. 2021. On generative spoken lan- guage modeling from raw audio. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 9:1336- 1354.
  10. Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. 2023. Visual instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08485. · arXiv
  11. Vassil Panayotov, Guoguo Chen, Daniel Povey, and San- jeev Khudanpur. 2015. Librispeech: An asr corpus based on public domain audio books. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 5206-5210. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al. 2023. Llama: Open and effi- cient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971. · arXiv
  13. Dong Zhang, Rong Ye, Tom Ko, Mingxuan Wang, and Yaqian Zhou. 2023a. DUB: Discrete unit back- translation for speech translation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 7147-7164, Toronto, Canada. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, D., Li, S., Zhang, X., Zhan, J., Wang, P., Zhou, Y., & Qiu, X.
Affiliations
Fudan University (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
Pages
15757-15773
OpenAlex
W4389524500
Cited by
189
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 11
FWCI
20.21
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (62236004, 62022027)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
speech language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review