The DOI matches its DataCite record.
LLM-Eval: Unified Multi-Dimensional Automatic Evaluation for Open-Domain Conversations with Large Language Models
Abstract
We propose LLM-Eval, a unified multi-dimensional automatic evaluation method for open-domain conversations with large language models (LLMs). Existing evaluation methods often rely on human annotations, ground-truth responses, or multiple LLM prompts, which can be expensive and time-consuming. To address these issues, we design a single prompt-based evaluation method that leverages a unified evaluation schema to cover multiple dimensions of conversation quality in a single model call. We extensively evaluate the performance of LLM-Eval on various benchmark datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness, efficiency, and adaptability compared to state-of-the-art evaluation methods. Our analysis also highlights the importance of choosing suitable LLMs and decoding strategies for accurate evaluation results. LLM-Eval offers a versatile and robust solution for evaluating open-domain conversation systems, streamlining the evaluation process and providing consistent performance across diverse scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Both Claude and ChatGPT generally achieve better performance across all dimensions when compared to GPT-3.5 [121, 159].”
From A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [121]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. In Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neural Information Process- ing Systems 2020, NeurIPS 2020, December 6-12, 2020, virtual.
- Yi Chen, Rui Wang, Haiyun Jiang, Shuming Shi, and Ruifeng Xu. 2023. Exploring the use of large lan- guage models for reference-free text quality eval- uation: A preliminary empirical study. CoRR, abs/2304.00723. · DOI · Paper page
- Jan Deriu, Álvaro Rodrigo, Arantxa Otegi, Guillermo Echegoyen, Sophie Rosset, Eneko Agirre, and Mark Cieliebak. 2021. Survey on evaluation methods for dialogue systems. Artif. Intell. Rev., 54(1):755-810. · DOI
- Jinlan Fu, See-Kiong Ng, Zhengbao Jiang, and Pengfei Liu. 2023. Gptscore: Evaluate as you desire. CoRR, abs/2302.04166. · DOI · Paper page
- Sarik Ghazarian, Johnny Wei, Aram Galstyan, and Nanyun Peng. 2019. Better automatic evaluation of open-domain dialogue systems with contextual- ized embeddings. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Methods for Optimizing and Evaluating Neural Language Generation, pages 82-89, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Computational Linguis- tics. · DOI
- Sarik Ghazarian, Ralph M. Weischedel, Aram Galstyan, and Nanyun Peng. 2020. Predictive engagement: An efficient metric for automatic evaluation of open- domain dialogue systems. In The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020, The Thirty-Second Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2020, The Tenth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial In- telligence, EAAI 2020, New York, NY, USA, February 7-12, 2020, pages 7789-7796. AAAI Press.
- Karthik Gopalakrishnan, Behnam Hedayatnia, Qinglang Chen, Anna Gottardi, Sanjeev Kwatra, Anu Venkatesh, Raefer Gabriel, and Dilek Hakkani-Tür. 2019. Topical-chat: Towards knowledge-grounded open-domain conversations. In Interspeech 2019, 20th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Graz, Austria, 15-19 September 2019, pages 1891-1895. ISCA. · DOI · Paper page
- Chiori Hori and Takaaki Hori. 2017. End-to-end conversation modeling track in DSTC6. CoRR, abs/1706.07440. · arXiv
- Lishan Huang, Zheng Ye, Jinghui Qin, Liang Lin, and Xiaodan Liang. 2020. GRADE: Automatic graph- enhanced coherence metric for evaluating open- domain dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 9230-9240, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Naomi Kong-Vega, Mingxin Shen, Mo Wang, and Luis Fernando D'Haro. 2018. Subjective annotation and evaluation of three different chatbots WOCHAT: shared task report. In 9th International Workshop on Spoken Dialogue System Technology, IWSDS 2018, Singapore, April 18-20, 2018, volume 579 of Lec- ture Notes in Electrical Engineering, pages 371-378. Springer. · DOI
- Seolhwa Lee, Heuiseok Lim, and João Sedoc. 2020. An evaluation protocol for generative conversational systems. CoRR, abs/2010.12741. · arXiv
- Zekang Li, Jinchao Zhang, Zhengcong Fei, Yang Feng, and Jie Zhou. 2021. Conversations are not flat: Mod- eling the dynamic information flow across dialogue utterances. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natu- ral Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 128-138, Online. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI
- Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. ROUGE: A package for auto- matic evaluation of summaries. In Text Summariza- tion Branches Out, pages 74-81, Barcelona, Spain. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Chia-Wei Liu, Ryan Lowe, Iulian Serban, Mike Nose- worthy, Laurent Charlin, and Joelle Pineau. 2016. How NOT to evaluate your dialogue system: An empirical study of unsupervised evaluation metrics for dialogue response generation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natu- ral Language Processing, pages 2122-2132, Austin, Texas. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Yang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang, Ruochen Xu, and Chenguang Zhu. 2023. G-eval: NLG evaluation using GPT-4 with better human alignment. CoRR, abs/2303.16634. · DOI · Paper page
- Shikib Mehri and Maxine Eskenazi. 2020a. Unsuper- vised evaluation of interactive dialog with DialoGPT. In Proceedings of the 21th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 225-235, 1st virtual meeting. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Shikib Mehri and Maxine Eskenazi. 2020b. USR: An unsupervised and reference free evaluation metric for dialog generation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 681-707, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Shikib Mehri, Yulan Feng, Carla Gordon, Seyed Hos- sein Alavi, David Traum, and Maxine Eskenazi. 2022. Interactive evaluation of dialog track at DSTC9. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 5731-5738, Mar- seille, France. European Language Resources Asso- ciation.
- OpenAI. 2023. GPT-4 technical report. CoRR, abs/2303.08774. · DOI · Paper page
- Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei- Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evalu- ation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Compu- tational Linguistics, pages 311-318, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Vitou Phy, Yang Zhao, and Akiko Aizawa. 2020. Decon- struct to reconstruct a configurable evaluation metric for open-domain dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 4164-4178, Barcelona, Spain (On- line). International Committee on Computational Lin- guistics. · DOI
- Hannah Rashkin, Eric Michael Smith, Margaret Li, and Y-Lan Boureau. 2019. Towards empathetic open- domain conversation models: A new benchmark and dataset. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 5370-5381, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Ananya B. Sai, Akash Kumar Mohankumar, Siddhartha Arora, and Mitesh M. Khapra. 2020. Improving di- alog evaluation with a multi-reference adversarial dataset and large scale pretraining. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8:810- 827. · DOI
- João Sedoc, Daphne Ippolito, Arun Kirubarajan, Jai Thirani, Lyle Ungar, and Chris Callison-Burch. 2019. ChatEval: A tool for chatbot evaluation. In Proceed- ings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics (Demonstrations), pages 60-65, Minneapo- lis, Minnesota. Association for Computational Lin- guistics. · DOI
- Eric Smith, Orion Hsu, Rebecca Qian, Stephen Roller, Y-Lan Boureau, and Jason Weston. 2022. Human evaluation of conversations is an open problem: com- paring the sensitivity of various methods for eval- uating dialogue agents. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on NLP for Conversational AI, pages 77- 97, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Chongyang Tao, Lili Mou, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2018. RUBER: an unsupervised method for auto- matic evaluation of open-domain dialog systems. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI-18), the 30th inno- vative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI- 18), and the 8th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI-18), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, February 2-7, 2018, pages 722-729. AAAI Press.
- Oriol Vinyals and Quoc V. Le. 2015. A neural conver- sational model. CoRR, abs/1506.05869. · arXiv
- Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed H. Chi, Quoc V. Le, and Denny Zhou. 2022. Chain-of-thought prompt- ing elicits reasoning in large language models. In NeurIPS.
- Yi-Ting Yeh, Maxine Eskenazi, and Shikib Mehri. 2021. A comprehensive assessment of dialog evaluation metrics. In The First Workshop on Evaluations and Assessments of Neural Conversation Systems, pages 15-33, Online. Association for Computational Lin- guistics. · DOI
- Chen Zhang, Yiming Chen, Luis Fernando D'Haro, Yan Zhang, Thomas Friedrichs, Grandee Lee, and Haizhou Li. 2021a. DynaEval: Unifying turn and dialogue level evaluation. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Confer- ence on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 5676-5689, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Chen Zhang, Luis Fernando D'Haro, Rafael E. Banchs, Thomas Friedrichs, and Haizhou Li. 2020a. Deep AM-FM: toolkit for automatic dialogue evaluation. In Conversational Dialogue Systems for the Next Decade -11th International Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems, IWSDS 2020, Madrid, Spain, 21- 23 September, 2020, volume 704 of Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, pages 53-69. Springer. · DOI
- Chen Zhang, João Sedoc, Luis Fernando D'Haro, Rafael E. Banchs, and Alexander Rudnicky. 2021b. Automatic evaluation and moderation of open- domain dialogue systems. CoRR, abs/2111.02110. · arXiv
- Pengfei Zhang, Xiaohui Hu, Kaidong Yu, Jian Wang, Song Han, Cao Liu, and Chunyang Yuan. 2022. MME-CRS: multi-metric evaluation based on correla- tion re-scaling for evaluating open-domain dialogue. CoRR, abs/2206.09403. · DOI
- Saizheng Zhang, Emily Dinan, Jack Urbanek, Arthur Szlam, Douwe Kiela, and Jason Weston. 2018. Per- sonalizing dialogue agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too? In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 2204-2213, Melbourne, Australia. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2020b. Bertscore: Eval- uating text generation with BERT. In 8th Inter- national Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020. OpenReview.net.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models
Chang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Yang, L., Zhu, K., Chen, H., Yi, X., Wang, C., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3641289 · Cited by 4,254
The rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4222-0 · Cited by 970
The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07864 · Cited by 972
From Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrieval
Li, X., Jin, J., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, P., Zhu, Y., & Dou, Z. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3722552 · Cited by 172
Simple techniques to bypass GenAI text detectors: implications for inclusive education
Perkins, M., Roe, J., Vu, B. H., Postma, D., Hickerson, D., McGaughran, J., & Khuat, H. Q. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00487-w · Cited by 117
“For tasks involving multistep reasoning, Fu et al. (2022) concluded that Claude 2's performance is comparable to that of GPT-4, with Lin and Chen (2023), claiming that Claude 2 slightly outperforms GPT-4.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, Y.-T., & Chen, Y.-N.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- arXiv
- 2305.13711
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review