PreprintCited by 23D Shape Modeling and AnalysisGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Towards Language-guided Interactive 3D Generation: LLMs as Layout Interpreter with Generative Feedback

Open access
Lin, Yiqi, Wu, Hao, Wang, Ruichen, Lu, Haonan, Lin, Xiaodong, Xiong, Hui, Wang, Lin·2023·arXiv

Abstract

Generating and editing a 3D scene guided by natural language poses a challenge, primarily due to the complexity of specifying the positional relations and volumetric changes within the 3D space. Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning, conversational, and zero-shot generation abilities across various domains. Surprisingly, these models also show great potential in realizing and interpreting the 3D space. In light of this, we propose a novel language-guided interactive 3D generation system, dubbed LI3D, that integrates LLMs as a 3D layout interpreter into the off-the-shelf layout-to-3D generative models, allowing users to flexibly and interactively generate visual content. Specifically, we design a versatile layout structure base on the bounding boxes and semantics to prompt the LLMs to model the spatial generation and reasoning from language. Our system also incorporates LLaVA, a large language and vision assistant, to provide generative feedback from the visual aspect for improving the visual quality of generated content. We validate the effectiveness of LI3D, primarily in 3D generation and editing through multi-round interactions, which can be flexibly extended to 2D generation and editing. Various experiments demonstrate the potential benefits of incorporating LLMs in generative AI for applications, e.g., metaverse. Moreover, we benchmark the layout reasoning performance of LLMs with neural visual artist tasks, revealing their emergent ability in the spatial layout domain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2305.15808

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HOLODECK is a language-guided system built upon AI2-THOR to automatically generate diverse, customized, and interactive 3D embodied environments from textual descriptions.

    “In light of these challenges, we present HOLODECK , a language-guided system built upon AI2-THOR [26], to automatically generate diverse, customized, and interactive 3D embodied environments from textual descriptions.”

    From Holodeck: Language Guided Generation of 3D Embodied AI Environments (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Abstract identifies the system proposed by this paper as LI3D, not HOLODECK. Section 2.1 describes LI3D as an LLM-based layout interpreter coupled to generative modules; it does not describe a system built upon AI2-THOR. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • HOLODECK is a promptable system based on AI2-THOR, enriched with assets from Objaverse, which can produce diverse, customized, and interactive Embodied AI environments with the guidance of large language models.

    “HOLODECK is a promptable system based on AI2-THOR [7, 26], enriched with massive assets from Objaverse [9], which can produce diverse, customized, and interactive Embodied AI environments with the guidance of large language models.”

    From Holodeck: Language Guided Generation of 3D Embodied AI Environments (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Abstract and Conclusion identify the paper’s system as LI3D, not HOLODECK. The Experiment Setup describes its 3D generation using CompoNeRF, whereas the claim describes a system based on AI2-THOR and enriched with Objaverse assets. The paper does support language-guided interactive 3D generation with LLMs, but not the claimed system identification or architecture. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Existing Embodied AI environments are typically crafted through manual design, 3D scanning, or procedurally generated with hard-coded rules.

    “Existing Embodied AI environments are typically crafted through manual design [6, 13, 26, 27], 3D scanning [8, 43, 45], or procedurally generated with hard-coded rules [7].”

    From Holodeck: Language Guided Generation of 3D Embodied AI Environments (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Introduction and Related Work discuss language-guided 3D scene generation, but do not describe how existing Embodied AI environments are typically created. Searches for manual design, 3D scanning, and procedural generation with hard-coded rules found no passage supporting the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Omri Avrahami, Dani Lischinski, and Ohad Fried. Blended diffusion for text-driven editing of natural images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18208-18218, 2022.
  2. Tim Brooks, Aleksander Holynski, and Alexei A Efros. Instructpix2pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.09800, 2022. · arXiv
  3. Sébastien Bubeck, Varun Chandrasekaran, Ronen Eldan, Johannes Gehrke, Eric Horvitz, Ece Kamar, Peter Lee, Yin Tat Lee, Yuanzhi Li, Scott Lundberg, et al. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712, 2023. · arXiv
  4. Minghao Chen, Iro Laina, and Andrea Vedaldi. Training-free layout control with cross-attention guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03373, 2023. · arXiv
  5. Yen-Chi Cheng, Hsin-Ying Lee, Sergey Tulyakov, Alexander Schwing, and Liangyan Gui. Sdfusion: Multimodal 3d shape completion, reconstruction, and generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04493, 2022. · arXiv
  6. Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, et al. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.02311, 2022. · arXiv
  7. Dana Cohen-Bar, Elad Richardson, Gal Metzer, Raja Giryes, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Set- the-scene: Global-local training for generating controllable nerf scenes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13450, 2023. · arXiv
  8. Xing Cui, Zekun Li, Peipei Li, Yibo Hu, Hailin Shi, and Zhaofeng He. I2edit: Towards multi-turn interactive image editing via dialogue. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11108, 2023. · arXiv
  9. Alaaeldin El-Nouby, Shikhar Sharma, Hannes Schulz, Devon Hjelm, Layla El Asri, Samira Ebrahimi Kahou, Yoshua Bengio, and Graham W Taylor. Tell, draw, and repeat: Generating and modifying images based on continual linguistic instruction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 10304-10312, 2019.
  10. Tao Gong, Chengqi Lyu, Shilong Zhang, Yudong Wang, Miao Zheng, Qian Zhao, Kuikun Liu, Wenwei Zhang, Ping Luo, and Kai Chen. Multimodal-gpt: A vision and language model for dialogue with humans. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04790, 2023. · arXiv
  11. Tanmay Gupta and Aniruddha Kembhavi. Visual programming: Compositional visual reasoning without training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11559, 2022. · arXiv
  12. Ayaan Haque, Matthew Tancik, Alexei A Efros, Aleksander Holynski, and Angjoo Kanazawa. Instruct-nerf2nerf: Editing 3d scenes with instructions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12789, 2023. · arXiv
  13. Qiuyuan Huang, Jae Sung Park, Abhinav Gupta, Paul Bennett, Ran Gong, Subhojit Som, Baolin Peng, Owais Khan Mohammed, Chris Pal, Yejin Choi, et al. Ark: Augmented reality with knowledge interactive emergent ability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.00970, 2023. · arXiv
  14. Ajay Jain, Ben Mildenhall, Jonathan T Barron, Pieter Abbeel, and Ben Poole. Zero-shot text-guided object generation with dream fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 867-876, 2022.
  15. Yuming Jiang, Ziqi Huang, Xingang Pan, Chen Change Loy, and Ziwei Liu. Talk-to-edit: Fine- grained facial editing via dialog. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 13799-13808, 2021.
  16. Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, and Timo Aila. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4401-4410, 2019.
  17. Gwanghyun Kim and Se Young Chun. Datid-3d: Diversity-preserved domain adaptation using text-to-image diffusion for 3d generative model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.16374, 2022. · arXiv
  18. Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer Whitehead, Alexander C Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, et al. Segment anything. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.02643, 2023. · arXiv
  19. Yuheng Li, Haotian Liu, Qingyang Wu, Fangzhou Mu, Jianwei Yang, Jianfeng Gao, Chunyuan Li, and Yong Jae Lee. Gligen: Open-set grounded text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.07093, 2023. · arXiv
  20. Chen-Hsuan Lin, Jun Gao, Luming Tang, Towaki Takikawa, Xiaohui Zeng, Xun Huang, Karsten Kreis, Sanja Fidler, Ming-Yu Liu, and Tsung-Yi Lin. Magic3d: High-resolution text-to-3d content creation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10440, 2022. · arXiv
  21. Yiqi Lin, Haotian Bai, Sijia Li, Haonan Lu, Xiaodong Lin, Hui Xiong, and Lin Wang. Compon- erf: Text-guided multi-object compositional nerf with editable 3d scene layout. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13843, 2023. · arXiv
  22. Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. Visual instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08485, 2023. · arXiv
  23. Gal Metzer, Elad Richardson, Or Patashnik, Raja Giryes, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Latent-nerf for shape-guided generation of 3d shapes and textures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.07600, 2022. · arXiv
  24. Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoor- thi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. Communications of the ACM, 65(1):99-106, 2021.
  25. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv, 2023.
  26. Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:27730-27744, 2022.
  27. Ryan Po and Gordon Wetzstein. Compositional 3d scene generation using locally conditioned diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12218, 2023. · arXiv
  28. Ben Poole, Ajay Jain, Jonathan T Barron, and Ben Mildenhall. Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14988, 2022. · arXiv
  29. Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8748-8763. PMLR, 2021.
  30. Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10684-10695, 2022.
  31. Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Jay Whang, Emily L Denton, Kamyar Ghasemipour, Raphael Gontijo Lopes, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Tim Salimans, et al. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:36479-36494, 2022.
  32. Wei Sun and Tianfu Wu. Image synthesis from reconfigurable layout and style. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 10531-10540, 2019.
  33. Romal Thoppilan, Daniel De Freitas, Jamie Hall, Noam Shazeer, Apoorv Kulshreshtha, Heng- Tze Cheng, Alicia Jin, Taylor Bos, Leslie Baker, Yu Du, et al. Lamda: Language models for dialog applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08239, 2022. · arXiv
  34. Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timo- thée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023. · arXiv
  35. Haochen Wang, Xiaodan Du, Jiahao Li, Raymond A Yeh, and Greg Shakhnarovich. Score jacobian chaining: Lifting pretrained 2d diffusion models for 3d generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.00774, 2022. · arXiv
  36. Chenfei Wu, Shengming Yin, Weizhen Qi, Xiaodong Wang, Zecheng Tang, and Nan Duan. Visual chatgpt: Talking, drawing and editing with visual foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04671, 2023. · arXiv
  37. Weihao Xia, Yujiu Yang, Jing-Hao Xue, and Baoyuan Wu. Tedigan: Text-guided diverse face image generation and manipulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2256-2265, 2021.
  38. Jiale Xu, Xintao Wang, Weihao Cheng, Yan-Pei Cao, Ying Shan, Xiaohu Qie, and Shenghua Gao. Dream3d: Zero-shot text-to-3d synthesis using 3d shape prior and text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.14704, 2022. · arXiv
  39. Zhengyuan Yang, Jianfeng Wang, Zhe Gan, Linjie Li, Kevin Lin, Chenfei Wu, Nan Duan, Zicheng Liu, Ce Liu, Michael Zeng, et al. Reco: Region-controlled text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.15518, 2022. · arXiv
  40. Bo Zhao, Lili Meng, Weidong Yin, and Leonid Sigal. Image generation from layout. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8584-8593, 2019.
  41. Yufan Zhou, Ruiyi Zhang, Jiuxiang Gu, Chris Tensmeyer, Tong Yu, Changyou Chen, Jinhui Xu, and Tong Sun. Tigan: Text-based interactive image generation and manipulation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 36, pages 3580-3588, 2022.
  42. Deyao Zhu, Jun Chen, Xiaoqian Shen, Xiang Li, and Mohamed Elhoseiny. Minigpt-4: En- hancing vision-language understanding with advanced large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10592, 2023. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, Y., Wu, H., Wang, R., Lu, H., Lin, X., Xiong, H., & Wang, L.
Affiliations
  • The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) (CN)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378499840
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
large language models, LLaVA, bounding box prompts, metaverse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review