CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 5Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEmbodied and Extended CognitionPsychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience

The feasibility of artificial consciousness through the lens of neuroscience

Open access
Aru, Jaan, Larkum, Matthew, Shine, James M.·2023·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2306.00915arXiv 2306.00915
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Interactions with large language models have led to the suggestion that these models may soon be conscious. From the perspective of neuroscience, this position is difficult to defend. For one, the inputs to large language models lack the embodied, embedded information content characteristic of our sensory contact with the world around us. Secondly, the architecture of large language models is missing key features of the thalamocortical system that have been linked to conscious awareness in mammals. Finally, the evolutionary and developmental trajectories that led to the emergence of living conscious organisms arguably have no parallels in artificial systems as envisioned today. The existence of living organisms depends on their actions, and their survival is intricately linked to multi-level cellular, inter-cellular, and organismal processes culminating in agency and consciousness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2306.00915

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Living organisms are not only self-maintaining homeostatic systems but are made up of cells that themselves engage in active self-maintenance.

    “living organisms are not only self-maintaining homeostatic systems but are made up of cells that themselves engage in active self-maintenance (e.g.Seth 2021, Aru et al. 2023)”

    From Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness (2023) · cites this paper as Aru et al. 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Seth, A. K., Baars, B. J., & Edelman, D. B. (2005). Criteria for consciousness in humans and other mammals. Consciousness and cognition, 14(1), 119-139.
  2. Edelman, D. B., & Seth, A. K. (2009). Animal consciousness: a synthetic approach. Trends in neurosciences, 32(9), 476-484.
  3. Birch, J., Schnell, A. K., & Clayton, N. S. (2020). Dimensions of animal consciousness. Trends in cognitive sciences, 24(10), 789-801.
  4. Baluška, F., & Reber, A. (2019). Sentience and consciousness in single cells: how the first minds emerged in unicellular species. BioEssays, 41(3), 1800229.
  5. Thompson, E. (2022). Could All Life Be Sentient? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 29(3-4), 229-265.
  6. Ball, P. (2022). The Book of Minds: How to Understand Ourselves and Other Beings, from Animals to AI to Aliens. University of Chicago Press.
  7. Chalmers, D. J. (2023). Could a large language model be conscious? arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07103. · arXiv
  8. y Arcas, B. A. (2022). Do large language models understand us?. Daedalus, 151(2), 183-197.
  9. Juliani, A., Arulkumaran, K., Sasai, S., & Kanai, R. (2022). On the link between conscious function and general intelligence in humans and machines. Transactions on Machine Learning Research.
  10. Rumelhart, D.E., ed. (1999) Parallel distributed processing. 1: Foundations / David E. Rumelhart, (12. print.), MIT Press.
  11. Llinás, R. and Ribary, U. (2001) Consciousness and the brain. The thalamocortical dialogue in health and disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 929, 166-175
  12. Snider, S. B., Bodien, Y. G., Bianciardi, M., Brown, E. N., Wu, O., & Edlow, B. L. (2019). Disruption of the ascending arousal network in acute traumatic disorders of consciousness. Neurology, 93(13), e1281-e1287.
  13. Edlow, B. L., Takahashi, E., Wu, O., Benner, T., Dai, G., Bu, L., ... & Folkerth, R. D. (2012). Neuroanatomic connectivity of the human ascending arousal system critical to consciousness and its disorders. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, 71(6), 531-546.
  14. Spindler, L. R., Luppi, A. I., Adapa, R. M., Craig, M. M., Coppola, P., Peattie, A. R., ... & Stamatakis, E. A. (2021). Dopaminergic brainstem disconnection is common to pharmacological and pathological consciousness perturbation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(30), e2026289118.
  15. Hindman, J., Bowren, M. D., Bruss, J., Wright, B., Geerling, J. C., & Boes, A. D. (2018). Thalamic strokes that severely impair arousal extend into the brainstem. Annals of neurology, 84(6), 926-930.
  16. Mitchell, M. and Krakauer, D.C. (2023) The debate over understanding in AI's large language models. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 120, e2215907120
  17. Uexküll, J. von (2010) A foray into the worlds of animals and humans: with A theory of meaning, (1st University of Minnesota Press ed.), University of Minnesota Press.
  18. Greeno, J.G. (1994) Gibson's affordances. Psychological Review 101, 336-342
  19. Vaswani, A. et al. (2017) Attention Is All You Need. DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV.1706.03762 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Brown, T.B. et al. (2020) Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV.2005.14165 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Nagel, T. (1974) What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review 83, 435
  22. Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., ... & Sutskever, I. (2021). Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 8748-8763).
  23. Driess, D., Xia, F., Sajjadi, M. S., Lynch, C., Chowdhery, A., Ichter, B., ... & Florence, P. (2023). Palm-e: An embodied multimodal language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03378. · arXiv
  24. Fultot, M., & Turvey, M. T. (2019). Von Uexküll's theory of meaning and Gibson's organism-environment reciprocity. Ecological Psychology, 31(4), 289-315.
  25. Damasio, A., & Damasio, H. (2022). Homeostatic feelings and the biology of consciousness. Brain, 145(7), 2231-2235.
  26. Panksepp, J. (2005). Affective consciousness: Core emotional feelings in animals and humans. Consciousness and cognition, 14(1), 30-80.
  27. Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, 70(2), 200-227.
  28. Tononi, G. (2008). Consciousness as integrated information: a provisional manifesto. The Biological Bulletin, 215(3), 216-242
  29. Supèr, H., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. (2001). Two distinct modes of sensory processing observed in monkey primary visual cortex (V1). Nature neuroscience, 4(3), 304-310.
  30. Lamme, V. A. (2006). Towards a true neural stance on consciousness. Trends in cognitive sciences, 10(11), 494-501.
  31. Imas, O. A., Ropella, K. M., Ward, B. D., Wood, J. D., & Hudetz, A. G. (2005). Volatile anesthetics disrupt frontal-posterior recurrent information transfer at gamma frequencies in rat. Neuroscience letters, 387(3), 145-150.
  32. Boly, M., Garrido, M. I., Gosseries, O., Bruno, M. A., Boveroux, P., Schnakers, C., ... & Friston, K. (2011). Preserved feedforward but impaired top-down processes in the vegetative state. Science, 332(6031), 858-862.
  33. Ku, S. W., Lee, U., Noh, G. J., Jun, I. G., & Mashour, G. A. (2011). Preferential inhibition of frontal-to-parietal feedback connectivity is a neurophysiologic correlate of general anesthesia in surgical patients. PloS one, 6(10), e25155.
  34. Bayne, T. (2012). The unity of consciousness. Oxford University Press.
  35. Singer, W. (1998). Consciousness and the structure of neuronal representations. Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London. Series B: biological sciences, 353(1377), 1829-1840.
  36. Singer, W. (2001). Consciousness and the binding problem. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 929(1), 123-146.
  37. Larkum, M. (2013). A cellular mechanism for cortical associations: an organizing principle for the cerebral cortex. Trends in neurosciences, 36(3), 141-151.
  38. Goyal, A., Didolkar, A., Lamb, A., Badola, K., Ke, N. R., Rahaman, N., ... & Bengio, Y. (2021). Coordination among neural modules through a shared global workspace. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.01197. · arXiv
  39. Juliani, A., Kanai, R., & Sasai, S. S. (2022). The perceiver architecture is a functional global workspace. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 44, No. 44).
  40. Koch, C. (2019). The feeling of life itself: why consciousness is widespread but can't be computed. Mit Press.
  41. Tononi, G., & Koch, C. (2015). Consciousness: here, there and everywhere?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1668), 20140167.
  42. Krom, A. J., Marmelshtein, A., Gelbard-Sagiv, H., Tankus, A., Hayat, H., Hayat, D., ... & Nir, Y. (2020). Anesthesia-induced loss of consciousness disrupts auditory responses beyond primary cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(21), 11770-11780.
  43. Hayat, H., Marmelshtein, A., Krom, A. J., Sela, Y., Tankus, A., Strauss, I., ... & Nir, Y. (2022). Reduced neural feedback signaling despite robust neuron and gamma auditory responses during human sleep. Nature neuroscience, 25(7), 935-943.
  44. Suzuki, M., & Larkum, M. E. (2020). General anesthesia decouples cortical pyramidal neurons. Cell, 180(4), 666-676.
  45. Seth, A. (2021). Being you: A new science of consciousness. Penguin.
  46. Thompson, E. (2010) Mind in life: biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind, (First Harvard University Press paperback edition.), The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
  47. Deacon, T.W. (2012) Incomplete nature: how mind emerged from matter, (1st ed.), W.W. Norton & Co 78. Louie, A. H. (2013). More than life itself: A synthetic continuation in relational biology (Vol. 1). Walter de Gruyter.
  48. Rosen, R. (1991). Life itself: a comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin, and fabrication of life. Columbia University Press.
  49. Rosen, R. (2000). Essays on life itself. Columbia University Press.
  50. Moreno, A., & Mossio, M. (2015) Biological Autonomy A Philosophical and Theoretical Enquiry. Springer.
  51. Nicholson, D. J. (2019). Is the cell really a machine?. Journal of theoretical biology, 477, 108-126.
  52. Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., Jessell, T. M., Siegelbaum, S., Hudspeth, A. J., & Mack, S. (Eds.). (2000). Principles of neural science (Vol. 4, pp. 1227-1246). New York: McGraw-hill.
  53. Searle, J. R. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. MIT press.
  54. Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  55. Gidon, A., Aru, J., & Larkum, M. E. (2022). Does brain activity cause consciousness? A thought experiment. PLoS Biology, 20(6), e3001651.
  56. Butlin, P. et al. (2023). Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness. Arxiv preprint.
  57. Richards, B. A., Lillicrap, T. P., Beaudoin, P., Bengio, Y., Bogacz, R., Christensen, A., ... & Kording, K. P. (2019). A deep learning framework for neuroscience. Nature neuroscience, 22(11), 1761-1770.
  58. Zador, A., Escola, S., Richards, B., Ölveczky, B., Bengio, Y., Boahen, K., ... & Tsao, D. (2023). Catalyzing next-generation artificial intelligence through neuroai. Nature communications, 14(1), 1597.
  59. Taleb, N.N. (2018) Skin in the game: hidden asymmetries in daily life, (First edition.), Random House
  60. Jonas, H. (2001) The phenomenon of life: toward a philosophical biology, Northwestern University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aru, J., Larkum, M., & Shine, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Tartu (EE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2306.00915
arXiv
2306.00915
OpenAlex
W4379260685
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Eesti Teadusagentuur (PSG728)
  • European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
Keywords
artificial consciousness, large language models, embodied cognition, thalamocortical system, conscious awareness, evolution of consciousness, agency, neuroscience of consciousness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review