The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Unlearnable Examples for Diffusion Models: Protect Data from Unauthorized Exploitation
Abstract
Diffusion models have demonstrated remarkable performance in image generation tasks, paving the way for powerful AIGC applications. However, these widely-used generative models can also raise security and privacy concerns, such as copyright infringement, and sensitive data leakage. To tackle these issues, we propose a method, Unlearnable Diffusion Perturbation, to safeguard images from unauthorized exploitation. Our approach involves designing an algorithm to generate sample-wise perturbation noise for each image to be protected. This imperceptible protective noise makes the data almost unlearnable for diffusion models, i.e., diffusion models trained or fine-tuned on the protected data cannot generate high-quality and diverse images related to the protected training data. Theoretically, we frame this as a max-min optimization problem and introduce EUDP, a noise scheduler-based method to enhance the effectiveness of the protective noise. We evaluate our methods on both Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model and Latent Diffusion Models, demonstrating that training diffusion models on the protected data lead to a significant reduction in the quality of the generated images. Especially, the experimental results on Stable Diffusion demonstrate that our method effectively safeguards images from being used to train Diffusion Models in various tasks, such as training specific objects and styles. This achievement holds significant importance in real-world scenarios, as it contributes to the protection of privacy and copyright against AI-generated content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Further research efforts (Ye et al., 2023;Zhao et al., 2024b) have also explored the generation of protective noise using analogous adversarial techniques.”
From Generative AI and intellectual property: a systematic literature review of possible issues and mitigations (2026) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2024b
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Sahar Abdelnabi and Mario Fritz. Adversarial watermarking transformer: Towards tracing text provenance with data hiding. In 2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 121- 140. IEEE, 2021.
- Fan Bao, Chongxuan Li, Jun Zhu, and Bo Zhang. Analytic-DPM: an analytic estimate of the opti- mal reverse variance in diffusion probabilistic models. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
- Andrew Brock, Jeff Donahue, and Karen Simonyan. Large scale gan training for high fidelity natural image synthesis. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.
- Prafulla Dhariwal and Alexander Nichol. Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. In Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pp. 8780-8794, 2021.
- Pierre Fernandez, Guillaume Couairon, Hervé Jégou, Matthijs Douze, and Teddy Furon. The sta- ble signature: Rooting watermarks in latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2023.
- Liam Fowl, Micah Goldblum, Ping-yeh Chiang, Jonas Geiping, Wojciech Czaja, and Tom Gold- stein. Adversarial examples make strong poisons. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pp. 30339-30351, 2021.
- Joel Frank, Thorsten Eisenhofer, Lea Schönherr, Asja Fischer, Dorothea Kolossa, and Thorsten Holz. Leveraging frequency analysis for deep fake image recognition. In International conference on machine learning, pp. 3247-3258. PMLR, 2020.
- Shaopeng Fu, Fengxiang He, Yang Liu, Li Shen, and Dacheng Tao. Robust unlearnable examples: Protecting data against adversarial learning. In International Conference on Learning Represen- tations, 2022.
- Rinon Gal, Yuval Alaluf, Yuval Atzmon, Or Patashnik, Amit H Bermano, Gal Chechik, and Daniel Cohen-Or. An image is worth one word: Personalizing text-to-image generation using textual inversion. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
- Rohit Gandikota, Joanna Materzynska, Jaden Fiotto-Kaufman, and David Bau. Erasing concepts from diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2023.
- Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial networks. In Communications of the ACM, volume 63, pp. 139-144. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2020.
- Ian J Goodfellow, Jonathon Shlens, and Christian Szegedy. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6572, 2014. · arXiv
- Xiao Guo, Xiaohong Liu, Zhiyuan Ren, Steven Grosz, Iacopo Masi, and Xiaoming Liu. Hierar- chical fine-grained image forgery detection and localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023.
- Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. In Advances in neural information processing systems, volume 30, 2017.
- Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pp. 6840-6851, 2020.
- Hanxun Huang, Xingjun Ma, Sarah Monazam Erfani, James Bailey, and Yisen Wang. Unlearn- able examples: Making personal data unexploitable. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
- Zhengyuan Jiang, Jinghuai Zhang, and Neil Zhenqiang Gong. Evading watermark based detection of ai-generated content. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2023.
- Tuomas Kynkäänniemi, Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, Jaakko Lehtinen, and Timo Aila. Improved precision and recall metric for assessing generative models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 32, 2019.
- Yandong Li, Lijun Li, Liqiang Wang, Tong Zhang, and Boqing Gong. Nattack: Learning the dis- tributions of adversarial examples for an improved black-box attack on deep neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 3866-3876. PMLR, 2019.
- Chumeng Liang, Xiaoyu Wu, Yang Hua, Jiaru Zhang, Yiming Xue, Tao Song, Zhengui Xue, Ruhui Ma, and Haibing Guan. Adversarial example does good: preventing painting imitation from diffusion models via adversarial examples. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 20763-20786, 2023.
- Alexander Quinn Nichol and Prafulla Dhariwal. Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 8162-8171. PMLR, 2021.
- Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 10684-10695, 2022.
- Nataniel Ruiz, Yuanzhen Li, Varun Jampani, Yael Pritch, Michael Rubinstein, and Kfir Aberman. Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject-driven generation. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023.
- Mehdi SM Sajjadi, Olivier Bachem, Mario Lucic, Olivier Bousquet, and Sylvain Gelly. Assessing generative models via precision and recall. In Advances in neural information processing systems, volume 31, 2018.
- Hadi Salman, Alaa Khaddaj, Guillaume Leclerc, Andrew Ilyas, and Aleksander Madry. Raising the cost of malicious ai-powered image editing. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2023.
- Pedro Sandoval-Segura, Vasu Singla, Liam Fowl, Jonas Geiping, Micah Goldblum, David Jacobs, and Tom Goldstein. Poisons that are learned faster are more effective. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 198-205, 2022.
- Zeyang Sha, Zheng Li, Ning Yu, and Yang Zhang. De-fake: Detection and attribution of fake images generated by text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2022.
- Shawn Shan, Jenna Cryan, Emily Wenger, Haitao Zheng, Rana Hanocka, and Ben Y Zhao. Glaze: Protecting artists from style mimicry by text-to-image models. In Proceedings of the 32nd USENIX Conference on Security Symposium, 2023.
- Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Eric Weiss, Niru Maheswaranathan, and Surya Ganguli. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In International Conference on Machine Learn- ing, pp. 2256-2265. PMLR, 2015.
- Yang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P Kingma, Abhishek Kumar, Stefano Ermon, and Ben Poole. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. In Interna- tional Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
- Lue Tao, Lei Feng, Jinfeng Yi, Sheng-Jun Huang, and Songcan Chen. Better safe than sorry: Pre- venting delusive adversaries with adversarial training. In Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, volume 34, pp. 16209-16225, 2021.
- Thanh Van Le, Hao Phung, Thuan Hoang Nguyen, Quan Dao, Ngoc N Tran, and Anh Tran. Anti- dreambooth: Protecting users from personalized text-to-image synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2116-2127, 2023.
- Zhendong Wang, Jianmin Bao, Wengang Zhou, Weilun Wang, Hezhen Hu, Hong Chen, and Houqiang Li. Dire for diffusion-generated image detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2023.
- Kaidi Xu, Sijia Liu, Pu Zhao, Pin-Yu Chen, Huan Zhang, Quanfu Fan, Deniz Erdogmus, Yanzhi Wang, and Xue Lin. Structured adversarial attack: Towards general implementation and better interpretability. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
- Kaidi Xu, Gaoyuan Zhang, Sijia Liu, Quanfu Fan, Mengshu Sun, Hongge Chen, Pin-Yu Chen, Yanzhi Wang, and Xue Lin. Adversarial t-shirt! evading person detectors in a physical world. In European conference on computer vision, pp. 665-681. Springer, 2020.
- Da Yu, Huishuai Zhang, Wei Chen, Jian Yin, and Tie-Yan Liu. Availability attacks create shortcuts. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 2367-2376, 2022.
- Huan Zhang, Shiqi Wang, Kaidi Xu, Yihan Wang, Suman Jana, Cho-Jui Hsieh, and Zico Kolter. A branch and bound framework for stronger adversarial attacks of relu networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 26591-26604. PMLR, 2022.
- Hanqing Zhao, Wenbo Zhou, Dongdong Chen, Tianyi Wei, Weiming Zhang, and Nenghai Yu. Multi- attentional deepfake detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 2185-2194, 2021.
Cited by
Arnaudo, A., Coppola, R., Morisio, M., Vetrò, A., Borghi, M., Raso, R., & Khan, B. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3928 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Z., Duan, J., Hu, X., Xu, K., Wang, C., Zhang, R., Du, Z., Guo, Q., & Chen, Y.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- arXiv
- 2306.01902
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review