The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Dealing with Semantic Underspecification in Multimodal NLP
Open accessAbstract
Intelligent systems that aim at mastering language as humans do must deal with its semantic underspecification, namely, the possibility for a linguistic signal to convey only part of the information needed for communication to succeed. Consider the usages of the pronoun they, which can leave the gender and number of its referent(s) underspecified. Semantic underspecification is not a bug but a crucial language feature that boosts its storage and processing efficiency. Indeed, human speakers can quickly and effortlessly integrate semantically-underspecified linguistic signals with a wide range of non-linguistic information, e.g., the multimodal context, social or cultural conventions, and shared knowledge. Standard NLP models have, in principle, no or limited access to such extra information, while multimodal systems grounding language into other modalities, such as vision, are naturally equipped to account for this phenomenon. However, we show that they struggle with it, which could negatively affect their performance and lead to harmful consequences when used for applications. In this position paper, we argue that our community should be aware of semantic underspecification if it aims to develop language technology that can successfully interact with human users. We discuss some applications where mastering it is crucial and outline a few directions toward achieving this goal.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Prior work on communication and linguistics has identified underspecification as a common feature of human language [41, 20, 22, 61].”
From LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation (2025) · cites this paper as [61]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation
Laban, P., Hayashi, H., Zhou, Y., & Neville, J. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Pezzelle, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Pezzelle, Sandro
- ORCID
- Pezzelle, Sandro
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 12098-12112
- ISSN
- 0736-587X (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2306.05240
- OpenAlex
- W4385565230
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- semantic underspecification, pronoun resolution, human-computer interaction, language technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dealing with Semantic Underspecification in Multimodal NLP. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2306.05240
- The paper
- Pezzelle, S. (2023). Dealing with Semantic Underspecification in Multimodal NLP. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2306.05240