FinGPT: Open-Source Financial Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential of revolutionizing natural language processing tasks in diverse domains, sparking great interest in finance. Accessing high-quality financial data is the first challenge for financial LLMs (FinLLMs). While proprietary models like BloombergGPT have taken advantage of their unique data accumulation, such privileged access calls for an open-source alternative to democratize Internet-scale financial data. In this paper, we present an open-source large language model, FinGPT, for the finance sector. Unlike proprietary models, FinGPT takes a data-centric approach, providing researchers and practitioners with accessible and transparent resources to develop their FinLLMs. We highlight the importance of an automatic data curation pipeline and the lightweight low-rank adaptation technique in building FinGPT. Furthermore, we showcase several potential applications as stepping stones for users, such as robo-advising, algorithmic trading, and low-code development. Through collaborative efforts within the open-source AI4Finance community, FinGPT aims to stimulate innovation, democratize FinLLMs, and unlock new opportunities in open finance. Two associated code repos are https://github.com/AI4Finance-Foundation/FinGPT and https://github.com/AI4Finance-Foundation/FinNLP
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLMs have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in analyzing and interpreting financial data, as evidenced by developments like BloombergGPT and FinGPT.
“LLMs have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in analyzing and interpreting financial data, as evidenced by developments like BloombergGPT [48], and FinGPT [50].”
From A Multimodal Foundation Agent for Financial Trading: Tool-Augmented, Diversified, and Generalist (2024) · cites this paper as [50]
Cites
FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data
Chen, Z., Chen, W., Smiley, C., Shah, S., Borova, I., Langdon, D., Moussa, R., Beane, M., Huang, T.-H., Routledge, B., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.300 · Cited by 258 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Other noteworthy datasets include FinRED [Sharma et al. , 2022], instrumental for information extraction tasks, FINQA [Chen et al. , 2021] for numerical reasoning assessments, and FinRAD [Ghosh et al. , 2021], which is crucial for understanding and identifying financial terms.”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Multimodal Foundation Agent for Financial Trading: Tool-Augmented, Diversified, and Generalist
Zhang, W., Zhao, L., Xia, H., Sun, S., Sun, J., Qin, M., Li, X., Zhao, Y., Zhao, Y., Cai, X., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3637528.3671801 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to Use
Huang, Y., Shi, J., Li, Y., Fan, C., Wu, S., Zhang, Q., Liu, Y., Zhou, P., Wan, Y., Gong, N. Z., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.03128 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Look-Ahead-Bench: a Standardized Benchmark of Look-ahead Bias in Point-in-Time LLMs for Finance
Benhenda, M. (2026) · arXiv
- Authors
- Yang, H., Liu, X.-Y., & Wang, C. D.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- New York University Shanghai (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Xiao-Yang
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2306.06031
- OpenAlex
- W4382998379
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 97 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 19
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- open-source AI, low-rank adaptation, robo-advising, sentiment analysis, open finance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
