The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Web
Open accessAbstract
We introduce Mind2Web, the first dataset for developing and evaluating generalist agents for the web that can follow language instructions to complete complex tasks on any website. Existing datasets for web agents either use simulated websites or only cover a limited set of websites and tasks, thus not suitable for generalist web agents. With over 2,000 open-ended tasks collected from 137 websites spanning 31 domains and crowdsourced action sequences for the tasks, Mind2Web provides three necessary ingredients for building generalist web agents: 1) diverse domains, websites, and tasks, 2) use of real-world websites instead of simulated and simplified ones, and 3) a broad spectrum of user interaction patterns. Based on Mind2Web, we conduct an initial exploration of using large language models (LLMs) for building generalist web agents. While the raw HTML of real-world websites are often too large to be fed to LLMs, we show that first filtering it with a small LM significantly improves the effectiveness and efficiency of LLMs. Our solution demonstrates a decent level of performance, even on websites or entire domains the model has never seen before, but there is still a substantial room to improve towards truly generalizable agents. We open-source our dataset, model implementation, and trained models (https://osu-nlp-group.github.io/Mind2Web) to facilitate further research on building a generalist agent for the web.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“We first run with AWM offline using both GPT variants, and find that AWM consistently obtains the highest success rate in both step and task levels, leading to 4 . 0 -8 . 9 % relative and 0 . 4 -2 . 8 absolute points increases in step-wise and task-wise success rates than the baselines - Synapse with gpt-3.5-turbo and MindAct with gpt-4 .”
From Agent Workflow Memory (2024) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As shown in Table 4, both AWM online and AWM offline surpass the MindAct baseline by a large margin, resulting in 7 . 4 -8 . 9 , 3 . 6 -3 . 8 , and 14 . 0 -16 . 9 absolute point improvements in step success rates, in cross-task, cross-website, and cross-domain scenarios.”
From Agent Workflow Memory (2024) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In contrast, the second class of benchmarks (Yao et al., 2022; Zhou et al.; Deng et al., 2023), such as SWEBench (Jimenez et al., 2023) and WebArena (Zhou et al.), primarily evaluate action by placing agents in dynamic environments, but are typically confined to a single session.”
From MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Tasks (2026) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Previous works related to web pages focus on addressing action-based requests, such as Mind2Web (Deng et al., 2023) and WebArena (Zhou et al., 2024a); these HTML-based instruction-action benchmarks face challenges such as excessively noisy information and overly long inputs, which can significantly hinder performance due to limitations in long-context understanding.”
From WebWalker: Benchmarking LLMs in Web Traversal (2025) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, they fail to capture the complexities of real-world scenarios where relevant information is buried deep within web pages and requires multiple layers of interaction.”
From WebWalker: Benchmarking LLMs in Web Traversal (2025) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Previous benchmarks provide datasets of demonstrations without executable environments [9, 40, 21].”
From OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“we also integrate 84 examples from other benchmarks focusing on single-application or domain-specific environments such as NL2Bash [29], Mind2Web [9], SheetCopilot [25], PPTC [14], and GAIA [36].”
From OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Mind2Web (Deng et al., 2023) features web navigation in cross-task, website, and domain settings, stressing the generality of agents on versatile operations and environments.”
From Agent Workflow Memory (2024) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2023
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“MindAct introduces webpage element filtering and multi-choice task format to ease observation processing, and Synapse changes the format to a trajectory style and augments retrieved relevant examples.”
From Agent Workflow Memory (2024) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2023
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Our evaluation data is derived from the Mind2Web dataset (Deng et al., 2023) which is public and cached offline, eliminating the need for attacks on live websites.”
From EIA: Environmental Injection Attack on Generalist Web Agents for Privacy Leakage (2024) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2023
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Despite more accurate element selection, AWM gets slightly lower action F 1 scores than MindAct, possibly because the augmented workflows may guide the agent to take certain actions aligning to the workflows, which are not always relevant to the particular environment state at hand.”
From Agent Workflow Memory (2024) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Rishi Bommasani, Drew A. Hudson, Ehsan Adeli, Russ B. Altman, Simran Arora, Sydney von Arx, Michael S. Bernstein, Jeannette Bohg, Antoine Bosselut, Emma Brunskill, Erik Bryn- jolfsson, Shyamal Buch, Dallas Card, Rodrigo Castellon, Niladri S. Chatterji, Annie S. Chen, Kathleen Creel, Jared Quincy Davis, Dorottya Demszky, Chris Donahue, Moussa Doumbouya, Esin Durmus, Stefano Ermon, John Etchemendy, Kawin Ethayarajh, Li Fei-Fei, Chelsea Finn, Trevor Gale, Lauren Gillespie, Karan Goel, Noah D. Goodman, Shelby Grossman, Neel Guha, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Peter Henderson, John Hewitt, Daniel E. Ho, Jenny Hong, Kyle Hsu, Jing Huang, Thomas Icard, Saahil Jain, Dan Jurafsky, Pratyusha Kalluri, Siddharth Karamcheti, Geoff Keeling, Fereshte Khani, Omar Khattab, Pang Wei Koh, Mark S. Krass, Ranjay Krishna, Rohith Kuditipudi, and et al. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. CoRR, abs/2108.07258, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07258. · arXiv
- Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Chris Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. Language models are few-shot learners. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M.F. Balcan, and H. Lin, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 1877-1901.
- Andrea Burns, Deniz Arsan, Sanjna Agrawal, Ranjitha Kumar, Kate Saenko, and Bryan A. Plum- mer. A dataset for interactive vision-language navigation with unknown command feasibility. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 2022.
- Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, Parker Schuh, Kensen Shi, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Joshua Maynez, Abhishek Rao, Parker Barnes, Yi Tay, Noam Shazeer, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Emily Reif, Nan Du, Ben Hutchinson, Reiner Pope, James Bradbury, Jacob Austin, Michael Isard, Guy Gur-Ari, Pengcheng Yin, Toju Duke, Anselm Levskaya, Sanjay Ghemawat, Sunipa Dev, Henryk Michalewski, Xavier Garcia, Vedant Misra, Kevin Robinson, Liam Fedus, Denny Zhou, Daphne Ippolito, David Luan, Hyeontaek Lim, Barret Zoph, Alexander Spiridonov, Ryan Sepassi, David Dohan, Shivani Agrawal, Mark Omernick, Andrew M. Dai, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Marie Pellat, Aitor Lewkowycz, Erica Moreira, Rewon Child, Oleksandr Polozov, Katherine Lee, Zongwei Zhou, Xuezhi Wang, Brennan Saeta, Mark Diaz, Orhan Firat, Michele Catasta, Jason Wei, Kathy Meier-Hellstern, Douglas Eck, Jeff Dean, Slav Petrov, and Noah Fiedel. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways, 2023. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v24/22-1144.html.
- Pengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, and Weizhu Chen. Deberta: decoding-enhanced bert with disentangled attention. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021. OpenReview.net, 2021. URL https: //openreview.net/forum?id=XPZIaotutsD.
- Evan Zheran Liu, Kelvin Guu, Panupong Pasupat, Tianlin Shi, and Percy Liang. Reinforcement learning on web interfaces using workflow-guided exploration. In 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2018, Vancouver, BC, Canada, April 30 -May 3, 2018, Conference Track Proceedings. OpenReview.net, 2018. URL https://openreview.net/ forum?id=ryTp3f-0-.
- Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert- networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 11 2019. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/1908.10084. · arXiv
- Tianlin Shi, Andrej Karpathy, Linxi Fan, Jonathan Hernandez, and Percy Liang. World of Bits: An Open-Domain Platform for Web-Based Agents. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 3135-3144. PMLR, July 2017.
- Mohit Shridhar, Jesse Thomason, Daniel Gordon, Yonatan Bisk, Winson Han, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Dieter Fox. ALFRED: A benchmark for interpreting grounded instructions for everyday tasks. In 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2020, Seattle, WA, USA, June 13-19, 2020, pages 10737-10746.
- Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, Rémi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, Joe Davison, Sam Shleifer, Patrick von Platen, Clara Ma, Yacine Jernite, Julien Plu, Canwen Xu, Teven Le Scao, Sylvain Gugger, Mariama Drame, Quentin Lhoest, and Alexander M. Rush. Transformers: State-of-the- art natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, pages 38-45, Online, October 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/ 2020.emnlp-demos.6.
- Nancy Xu, Sam Masling, Michael Du, Giovanni Campagna, Larry Heck, James A. Landay, and Monica S. Lam. Grounding open-domain instructions to automate web support tasks. In North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–171 of 171
Task-Adaptive Retrieval over Agentic Multi-Modal Web Histories via Learned Graph Memory
Forouzandeh, S., Berahmand, K., & Jalili, M. (2026) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3805712.3809978
MemoPlan: Long-Horizon Web Agents with Differential Memory Compression and Lookahead Planning
Li, M., Zhu, R., & Liu, C. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-3438-7_42
CoRa-Web: Hierarchical Visual Planning for Robust and Efficient Web Agents
Wang, Y., Wu, J., & Li, H. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-3438-7_48
EvoMem: Timeline-Grounded Validity Adjudication for Non-Monotonic Multi-Agent Memory
Wang, Z., Wang, C., Luo, H., Gao, Y., & Wang, B. (2026) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3805712.3809931
Self-citationTEC: A Collection of Human Trial-and-error Trajectories for Problem Solving
Zhang, X., Zhan, J., Liu, Y., & Ai, Q. (2026) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3805712.3808611
Guo, Y., Lu, H., Wu, M. S., Xiong, T., Deng, Y., Ran, D., Yang, W. M., & Xie, T. (2026) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3803437.3805252
MemoryPlayback: Leveraging Trajectory-Derived Priors for Robust Mobile GUI Execution
Luo, Q., Tang, S., Han, R., Wang, M., Dong, S., Liu, H. Y., Liang, X., He, C., Wang, W. H., & Zhang, H. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-3557-5_7
ReflexAct: Closing the Loop for Web Agents via Visual Verification and Adaptive Grounding
Huang, J., Wu, J., & Li, H. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-3403-5_14
Piro, L., Candello, H. C. D. S. P., Matera, M., & Murad, C. (2026) · ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI) · doi:10.1145/3816046.3816323
Evaluating the Use of LLMs for Automated DOM-Level Resolution of Web Performance Issues
Peters, G., Khatoonabadi, S., & Shihab, E. (2026) · International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) · doi:10.1145/3793302.3793361
Sakib, S. N., Rubaiat, S. Y., & Jamil, H. M. (2026) · International Conference on Scalable Scientific Data Management (SSDBM) · doi:10.1145/3828820.3828822
Beyond Trajectory: Explicit Case-Based Memory for Decision-Making in Multimodal GUI Agents
Zhang, Y., & Zheng, A. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-33865-5_21
A Platform-Aware Survey of Execution, Verification, and Risk of Graphical User Interface Agents
Wu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2026) · ENGINEERING Information Technology & Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1631/eng.itee.2026.0103
CostGuard: A Cost-Aware Agentic AI Framework for Efficient Enterprise LLM Workflows
Sriram, S., & Arul Murugan, A. (2026) · International Conference on Data Science for Cyber-Physical Systems Resilience using Advanced Applications (ICDCA) · doi:10.1109/icdca69396.2026.11620090
Trustworthy LLM-Based Agents for Data-Centric AI
Chen, T., Pei, J., Zhang, M., & Zhao, L. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3816453
Parallelizing LLM Agent Execution with Contrastive Task Allocation
Peng, Y., Xu, Y., Wang, S., Liao, X., & Li, Q. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3817872 · Cited by 2
GEM-Bench: A Benchmark for Ad-Injected Response Generation within Generative Engine Marketing
Hu, S., Zhang, S., Shi, Y., & Xiao, X. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3817474
Passing the Turing Test on Screen: A Benchmark for Mobile GUI Agent Humanization
Zhu, J., Yang, L., Shan, R., Zheng, C., Zheng, Z., Liu, W., Yu, Y., Zhang, W., & Lin, J. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3817471
Reinforcement Learning for Multimodal Foundation Models: A Survey
Wu, W., Gao, C., Chen, J., Lin, Q., Meng, Q., Zhang, Y., Qiu, Y., Zhou, H., & Shou, M. Z. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3837760 · Cited by 12
StickyMemory: Robust Web Agents with Episodic Memory and Self-Verification
Gudipuri, N. (2026) · International Conference on Cybersecurity, Digital Forensics, and AI Applications (ICCSDFAI) · doi:10.1109/iccsdfai70505.2026.11647973
FTDI: A budget-aware self-healing framework for LLM multi-agent code generation
Men, S., Lu, Z., Luo, H., & Zheng, Y. (2026) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2026.134164
Janus: Edge Content Negotiation for Agent-Oriented Web QoS
Chen, Z., & Huang, Z. (2026) · International Workshop on Quality of Service · doi:10.1109/iwqos70441.2026.11661281
AI Agents for Heuristic Usability Evaluation: A Comparative Study with Human Experts
Cabezas, H., Luna-García, H., Sarmiento, W. J., Celaya-Padilla, J. M., Acra-Despradel, C., & Villalba‐Condori, K. O. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31223-5_1
Internet of Agents (IoA): Sensing, Communication, Decision-Making, and Execution
Wang, J., Ning, H., Ding, J., Zhu, T., & Daneshmand, M. (2026) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2026.3729267
Periasamy, P. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31755-1_27
The Assumed Reader: AI Agents, Hypertext, and the Vulnerable Limits of Interpretation
Gupta, M., & Joshi, A. (2026) · ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) · doi:10.1145/3800935.3830883
Li, X., Yang, Z., Li, D., Jiang, Y., & Li, J. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS) · doi:10.1109/icws72778.2026.00078
Robsky, A., Lavitas, L., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-26749-8_4
Self-evolving MCP-GUI Agents via Automated Environment Generation and Experience Learning
He, T., Chen, Y., Jiang, K., Lee, K. Y., Zhou, K., Shao, K., & Wang, S. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-37556-8_35 · Cited by 5
Guiding the Blind: Generalizing GUI Agents to Unseen Websites via Multimodal Tutorials
Long, X., Tian, K., Xu, P., Gao, W., Shao, Y., Jia, G., Geng, H., Yang, S., Li, J., Hu, H., et al. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-37490-5_21
Bagherzadeh, A., & Tehranchi, F. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1913953
WebRLED: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Automated Web Application Exploration
Gu, Z., Wu, G., Zhang, Y., Yang, C., Chen, W., & Wei, J. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3843235
SeeAct-VC: Improving Browser Automation Through Complementary Visual Clues
Kaya, Z. S., Bergamin, L., Rigoni, D., Shahhat, A., Toni, M., Sperduti, A., & Pasa, L. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-39028-8_33
Controlled knowledge updating in memory-enabled AI agents: beyond model editing and recall
Chavira, G., Bravo, E. J. G., García, G. E. R., Espinosa, J. A. A., & Nava, S. W. (2026) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2026.1938137
Habib, R., Balachandran, B., Demir, N., & Durumeric, Z. (2026) · ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC) · doi:10.1145/3777912.3839788
A survey on AI agent security: Reasoning, Acting, and Self-Evolving
Liu, D., Luo, T., Huang, S., Yang, J., Liang, S., Jia, X., Lau, C. P., Dong, J., Liu, Y., Bai, Y., et al. (2026) · AI Plus · doi:10.59717/ipj.aiplus.2026.100004
Measuring AI-Agent Accessibility of Web Applications: A Construct-Development Framework
Adediran, O. T. O., Memuletiwon, O. O. O., & Opeyemi Joshua Adelowo, A. U. (2026) · International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology · doi:10.48175/ijarsct-38520
Characterizing and Repairing Obsolete Android GUI Tests under UI Evolution
Song, S., Xiong, Y., Guo, W., Sun, M., Kong, J., & Xie, X. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3832300
AgentBreaker: Evaluating Context-Aware Indirect Prompt Injection Risks in Modern Web Agents
Son, Y., Lee, C., Shin, D., Lee, B., Hong, S., & Son, S. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3832165
DebateGuard: Action-Level Deliberation for Web Agents under Deceptive Interfaces
Duan, L., Lin, J., Wang, Y., Liu, H., Zhang, X., & Wu, J. (2026) · International Conference on Computer Vision and Data Mining (ICCVDM) · doi:10.1109/iccvdm71812.2026.11709104
Boosting Vision-Language Model for Cross-Device GUI Agent Grounding and Navigation
Chen, B.-Y., Shih, L.-H., & Chiang, C.-K. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR) · doi:10.1109/mipr70517.2026.00011
Semantic Tree: Leveraging Semantic UI Representation for Test Case Generation
Priccilia, S., Soeparno, H., Gaol, F. L., Arifin, Y., & Soewito, B. (2026) · International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS) · doi:10.1109/iciss71466.2026.11715044
A critical assessment of the rise of agentic AI, its capabilities, task domains and open challenges
Khan, R. U., Aljuaid, H., & Ning, Z. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-02342-5 · Cited by 2
Lops, A., Ferrara, A., Narducci, F., Ragone, A., & Trizio, M. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3834507
Anticipatory Planning for Multimodal AI Agents
Liang, Y., Zhou, S., Gu, Y., Tan, H., Wu, G., Dernoncourt, F., Kil, J., Rossi, R. A., & Zhang, R. (2026) · 2026 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition- FINDINGS Track (CVPRF) · doi:10.1109/cvprf71909.2026.00569
Self-citationCarePilot: A Multi-Agent Framework for Long-Horizon Computer Task Automation in Healthcare
Ghosh, A. K., Ashraf, T., Singh, R. K., Saeed, N., Saha, S., Chen, X., & Khan, S. (2026) · doi:10.1109/cvprf71909.2026.00928 · Cited by 5
Sadjadi, S. M., Bai, Q., Yang, W., & Liu, Q. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7593345
In-Context Teacher–Student Guidance for Open-Weight Browser Agents
Cardoso, W. S., & Marcacini, R. M. (2026) · Anais do Symposium on Knowledge Discovery, Mining and Learning (KDMiLe) · doi:10.5753/kdmile.2026.32021
Generative AI Decision Support in B2C E-Commerce: A Consumer Buying Behaviour Framework
Ilieva, G. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15204781
Movin, M., Hauff, C., Henriksson, A., & Papapetrou, P. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-41086-3_23
Multi-level Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Agent Workflow Synthesis
Fan, H., & Cao, J. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-6910-5_32
A Scientific Theory of Consciousness
Goldstein, S., & Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197840375.003.0009
Goldstein, S., & Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197840375.003.0002
Goldstein, S., & Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197840375.003.0008
Goldstein, S., & Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197840375.003.0001
Goldstein, S., & Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197840375.003.0010
Goldstein, S., & Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197840375.003.0011
Goldstein, S., & Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197840375.003.0004
Goldstein, S., & Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197840375.003.0013
Goldstein, S., & Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197840375.003.0006
Goldstein, S., & Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197840375.003.0017
Goldstein, S., & Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197840375.003.0015
Goldstein, S., & Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197840375.003.0014
Belief and Desire in AI Systems
Goldstein, S., & Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197840375.003.0005
Goldstein, S., & Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197840375.003.0016
Goldstein, S., & Kirk‐Giannini, C. D. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197840375.001.0001
WiP: Mobile Web Data Asset Valuation for Accessible Mobile Web Spatial Design
Chen, G., & Xiang, Z. (2026) · ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom) · doi:10.1145/3795866.3844746
Lee, L., & Zhang, X. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7669369
LLM-based agents for generalized web automation and schema-guided data extraction: a survey
Khayoub, I., Chadi, M.-A., Mousannif, H., & Mohamed, F. A. (2026) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-026-01335-y
A Case for AI Consciousness: Language Agents and Global Workspace Theory
Goldstein, S., & Kirk-Giannini, C. D. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.11407 · Cited by 4
Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents
Zhang, Z., Cui, S., Lu, Y., Zhou, J., Yang, J., Wang, H., & Huang, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.14470 · Cited by 6
“• GuardAgent (Xiang et al., 2024), which is derived from eICU dataset (Pollard et al., 2018) (under the MIT license) and Mind2Web dataset (Deng et al., 2023) (under the CC-BY 4.0 license).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Deng, X., Gu, Y., Zheng, B., Chen, S., Stevens, S., Wang, B., Sun, H., & Su, Y.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 28091-28114
- ISSN
- 1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2306.06070
- OpenAlex
- W7133215859
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 104 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 34.44
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1942980, 2112606, CAREER)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Keywords
- web agents, web search, large language models, information retrieval
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
