PreprintCited by 4Machine Learning and Data ClassificationAdvanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tune As You Scale: Hyperparameter Optimization For Compute Efficient Training

Open access
Fetterman, Abraham J., Kitanidis, Ellie, Albrecht, Joshua, Polizzi, Zachary, Fogelman, Bryden, Knutins, Maksis, Wróblewski, Bartosz, Simon, James B., Qiu, Kanjun·2023·arXiv

Abstract

Hyperparameter tuning of deep learning models can lead to order-of-magnitude performance gains for the same amount of compute. Despite this, systematic tuning is uncommon, particularly for large models, which are expensive to evaluate and tend to have many hyperparameters, necessitating difficult judgment calls about tradeoffs, budgets, and search bounds. To address these issues and propose a practical method for robustly tuning large models, we present Cost-Aware Pareto Region Bayesian Search (CARBS), a Bayesian optimization algorithm that performs local search around the performance-cost Pareto frontier. CARBS does well even in unbounded search spaces with many hyperparameters, learns scaling relationships so that it can tune models even as they are scaled up, and automates much of the "black magic" of tuning. Among our results, we effectively solve the entire ProcGen benchmark just by tuning a simple baseline (PPO, as provided in the original ProcGen paper). We also reproduce the model size vs. training tokens scaling result from the Chinchilla project (Hoffmann et al. 2022), while simultaneously discovering scaling laws for every other hyperparameter, via an easy automated process that uses significantly less compute and is applicable to any deep learning problem (not just language models).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2306.08055

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated data

    Villalobos, P., Ho, A., Sevilla, J., Besiroglu, T., Heim, L., & Hobbhahn, M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.04325 · Cited by 80

    “…as the biggest ones on our list. demand for larger training datasets, consistent with neural scaling laws for dense transformers which suggest that training data size should scale roughly with the square root of training compute (Hoffmann et al., 2022; Dey et al., 2023; Fetterman et al., 2023).”
    Background

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Fetterman, A. J., Kitanidis, E., Albrecht, J., Polizzi, Z., Fogelman, B., Knutins, M., Wróblewski, B., Simon, J. B., & Qiu, K.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380990044
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Keywords
hyperparameter optimization, Bayesian optimization, Pareto front, cost-performance trade-off, large language models, model scaling, computational efficiency, Procgen, PPO, scaling laws, hyperparameter search

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review