PreprintCited by 179Machine Learning in BioinformaticsFractal and DNA sequence analysisGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

DNABERT-2: Efficient Foundation Model and Benchmark For Multi-Species Genome

Open access
Zhou, Zhihan, Ji, Yanrong, Li, Weijian, Dutta, Pratik, Davuluri, Ramana, Liu, Han·2023·arXiv

Abstract

Decoding the linguistic intricacies of the genome is a crucial problem in biology, and pre-trained foundational models such as DNABERT and Nucleotide Transformer have made significant strides in this area. Existing works have largely hinged on k-mer, fixed-length permutations of A, T, C, and G, as the token of the genome language due to its simplicity. However, we argue that the computation and sample inefficiencies introduced by k-mer tokenization are primary obstacles in developing large genome foundational models. We provide conceptual and empirical insights into genome tokenization, building on which we propose to replace k-mer tokenization with Byte Pair Encoding (BPE), a statistics-based data compression algorithm that constructs tokens by iteratively merging the most frequent co-occurring genome segment in the corpus. We demonstrate that BPE not only overcomes the limitations of k-mer tokenization but also benefits from the computational efficiency of non-overlapping tokenization. Based on these insights, we introduce DNABERT-2, a refined genome foundation model that adapts an efficient tokenizer and employs multiple strategies to overcome input length constraints, reduce time and memory expenditure, and enhance model capability. Furthermore, we identify the absence of a comprehensive and standardized benchmark for genome understanding as another significant impediment to fair comparative analysis. In response, we propose the Genome Understanding Evaluation (GUE), a comprehensive multi-species genome classification dataset that amalgamates $36$ distinct datasets across $9$ tasks, with input lengths ranging from $70$ to $10000$. Through comprehensive experiments on the GUE benchmark, we demonstrate that DNABERT-2 achieves comparable performance to the state-of-the-art model with $21 \times$ fewer parameters and approximately $92 \times$ less GPU time in pre-training.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2306.15006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing DNA language models are limited by dense Transformer architectures, incur high computational cost that scales quadratically with sequence length, and generally underperform at single-nucleotide or byte-level resolution compared with models trained at coarser resolutions.

    “existing attempts to model DNA as a language (15–17) are limited by the prevailing dense Transformer architecture, which incurs high computational cost as input sequence lengths grow relative to model width (scaling quadratically) and generally underperforms at single-nucleotide or byte-level resolution compared with models trained at coarser resolutions (18).”

    From Sequence modeling and design from molecular to genome scale with Evo (2024) · cites this paper as [17]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Žiga Avsec, Vikram Agarwal, Daniel Visentin, Joseph R Ledsam, Agnieszka Grabska-Barwinska, Kyle R Taylor, Yannis Assael, John Jumper, Pushmeet Kohli, and David R Kelley. Effective gene expression prediction from sequence by integrating long-range interactions. Nature methods , 18 (10):1196-1203, 2021.
  2. Marta Byrska-Bishop, Uday S. Evani, Xuefang Zhao, Anna O. Basile, Haley J. Abel, Allison A. Regier, André Corvelo, Wayne E. Clarke, Rajeeva Musunuri, Kshithija Nagulapalli, Susan Fairley, Alexi Runnels, Lara Winterkorn, Ernesto Lowy-Gallego, The Human Genome Structural Variation Consortium, Paul Flicek, Soren Germer, Harrison Brand, Ira M. Hall, Michael E. Talkowski, Giuseppe Narzisi, and Michael C. Zody. High coverage whole genome sequencing of the expanded 1000 genomes project cohort including 602 trios. bioRxiv , 2021. doi: 10.1101/2021.02.06.430068. URL https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/ 2021/02/07/2021.02.06.430068 . · DOI
  3. ENCODE Project Consortium et al. An integrated encyclopedia of dna elements in the human genome. Nature , 489(7414):57, 2012.
  4. Hugo Dalla-Torre, Liam Gonzalez, Javier Mendoza-Revilla, Nicolas Lopez Carranza, Adam Henryk Grzywaczewski, Francesco Oteri, Christian Dallago, Evan Trop, Hassan Sirelkhatim, Guillaume Richard, Marcin Skwark, Karim Beguir, Marie Lopez, and Thomas Pierrot. The nucleotide transformer: Building and evaluating robust foundation models for human genomics. bioRxiv , 2023. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.11.523679. URL https://www.biorxiv.org/content/ early/2023/03/09/2023.01.11.523679 . · DOI · Paper page
  5. Yann N. Dauphin, Angela Fan, Michael Auli, and David Grangier. Language modeling with gated convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 70 , ICML'17, pp. 933-941. JMLR.org, 2017.
  6. Katarína Grešová, Vlastimil Martinek, David ˇ Cechák, Petr Šimeˇ cek, and Panagiotis Alexiou. Genomic benchmarks: a collection of datasets for genomic sequence classification. BMC Genomic Data , 24(1):25, 2023.
  7. Yanrong Ji, Zhihan Zhou, Han Liu, and Ramana V Davuluri. Dnabert: pre-trained bidirectional encoder representations from transformers model for dna-language in genome. Bioinformatics , 37 (15):2112-2120, 2021.
  8. Junru Jin, Yingying Yu, Ruheng Wang, Xin Zeng, Chao Pang, Yi Jiang, Zhongshen Li, Yutong Dai, Ran Su, Quan Zou, Kenta Nakai, and Leyi Wei. iDNA-ABF: multi-scale deep biological language learning model for the interpretable prediction of DNA methylations. Genome Biol. , 23(1):219, October 2022.
  9. Jacob Devlin Ming-Wei Chang Kenton and Lee Kristina Toutanova. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT , pp. 41714186, 2019.
  10. Shruti Khare, Céline Gurry, Lucas Freitas, Mark B Schultz, Gunter Bach, Amadou Diallo, Nancy Akite, Joses Ho, Raphael TC Lee, Winston Yeo, et al. Gisaid's role in pandemic response. China CDC weekly , 3(49):1049, 2021.
  11. Dohoon Lee, Jeewon Yang, and Sun Kim. Learning the histone codes with large genomic windows and three-dimensional chromatin interactions using transformer. Nature Communications , 13(1): 6678, 2022.
  12. Zhongxiao Li, Elva Gao, Juexiao Zhou, Wenkai Han, Xiaopeng Xu, and Xin Gao. Applications of deep learning in understanding gene regulation. Cell Reports Methods , 3(1):100384, 2023. ISSN 2667-2375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2022.100384. URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667237522002892 . · DOI
  13. Eric Nguyen, Michael Poli, Marjan Faizi, Armin Thomas, Michael Wornow, Callum Birch-Sykes, Stefano Massaroli, Aman Patel, Clayton Rabideau, Yoshua Bengio, et al. Hyenadna: Long-range genomic sequence modeling at single nucleotide resolution. Advances in neural information processing systems , 36, 2024.
  14. Yu Ni, Linqi Fan, Miao Wang, Ning Zhang, Yongchun Zuo, and Mingzhi Liao. EPI-Mind: Identifying enhancer-promoter interactions based on transformer mechanism. Interdiscip. Sci. , 14(3):786-794, September 2022.
  15. Ofir Press, Noah A Smith, and Mike Lewis. Train short, test long: Attention with linear biases enables input length extrapolation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.12409 , 2021. · arXiv
  16. Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J Liu. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. The Journal of Machine Learning Research , 21(1):5485-5551, 2020.
  17. Jill E Moore, Jonathan Mudge, Nicholas Nelson, Chad Nusbaum, Ioann Popov, Henry E Pratt, Yunjiang Qiu, Srividya Ramakrishnan, Joe Raymond, Leonidas Salichos, Alexandra Scavelli, Jacob M Schreiber, Fritz J Sedlazeck, Lei Hoon See, Rachel M Sherman, Xu Shi, Minyi Shi, Cricket Alicia Sloan, J Seth Strattan, Zhen Tan, Forrest Y Tanaka, Anna Vlasova, Jun Wang, Jonathan Werner, Brian Williams, Min Xu, Chengfei Yan, Lu Yu, Christopher Zaleski, Jing Zhang, Kristin Ardlie, J Michael Cherry, Eric M Mendenhall, William S Noble, Zhiping Weng, Morgan E Levine, Alexander Dobin, Barbara Wold, Ali Mortazavi, Bing Ren, Jesse Gillis, Richard M Myers, Michael P Snyder, Jyoti Choudhary, Aleksandar Milosavljevic, Michael C Schatz, Bradley E Bernstein, Roderic Guigó, Thomas R Gingeras, and Mark Gerstein. The EN-TEx resource of multi-tissue personal epigenomes & variant-impact models. Cell , 186(7):1493-1511.e40, March 2023.
  18. Rico Sennrich, Barry Haddow, and Alexandra Birch. Neural machine translation of rare words with subword units. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pp. 1715-1725, Berlin, Germany, August 2016. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/P16-1162. URL https://aclanthology. org/P16-1162 . · DOI · Paper page
  19. Gabrielle D Smith, Wan Hern Ching, Paola Cornejo-Páramo, and Emily S Wong. Decoding enhancer complexity with machine learning and high-throughput discovery. Genome Biol. , 24(1):116, May 2023.
  20. John A Stamatoyannopoulos, Michael Snyder, Ross Hardison, Bing Ren, Thomas Gingeras, David M Gilbert, Mark Groudine, Michael Bender, Rajinder Kaul, Theresa Canfield, et al. An encyclopedia of mouse dna elements (mouse encode). Genome biology , 13(8):1-5, 2012.
  21. Jianlin Su, Yu Lu, Shengfeng Pan, Ahmed Murtadha, Bo Wen, and Yunfeng Liu. Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.09864 , 2021. · arXiv
  22. Christina V Theodoris, Ling Xiao, Anant Chopra, Mark D Chaffin, Zeina R Al Sayed, Matthew C Hill, Helene Mantineo, Elizabeth M Brydon, Zexian Zeng, X Shirley Liu, and Patrick T Ellinor. Transfer learning enables predictions in network biology. Nature , 618(7965):616-624, June 2023.
  23. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems , 30, 2017.
  24. Zixuan Wang, Yongqing Zhang, Yuhang Liu, Shuwen Xiong, Maocheng Wang, Jiliu Zhou, and Meiqin Gong. Towards a better understanding of tf-dna binding prediction from genomic features. Computers in Biology and Medicine , pp. 105993, 2022.
  25. Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, Rémi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, Joe Davison, Sam Shleifer, Patrick von Platen, Clara Ma, Yacine Jernite, Julien Plu, Canwen Xu, Teven Le Scao, Sylvain Gugger, Mariama Drame, Quentin Lhoest, and Alexander M. Rush. Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations , pp. 38-45, Online, October 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.emnlp-demos.6 .
  26. Pengyu Zhang, Hongming Zhang, and Hao Wu. ipro-wael: a comprehensive and robust framework for identifying promoters in multiple species. Nucleic Acids Research , 50(18):10278-10289, 2022.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, Z., Ji, Y., Li, W., Dutta, P., Davuluri, R., & Liu, H.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4382490702
Cited by
179
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
DNABERT-2, byte pair encoding, Nucleotide Transformer, parameter-efficient models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review