PanGu-Coder2: Boosting Large Language Models for Code with Ranking Feedback
Open accessAbstract
Large Language Models for Code (Code LLM) are flourishing. New and powerful models are released on a weekly basis, demonstrating remarkable performance on the code generation task. Various approaches have been proposed to boost the code generation performance of pre-trained Code LLMs, such as supervised fine-tuning, instruction tuning, reinforcement learning, etc. In this paper, we propose a novel RRTF (Rank Responses to align Test&Teacher Feedback) framework, which can effectively and efficiently boost pre-trained large language models for code generation. Under this framework, we present PanGu-Coder2, which achieves 62.20% pass@1 on the OpenAI HumanEval benchmark. Furthermore, through an extensive evaluation on CoderEval and LeetCode benchmarks, we show that PanGu-Coder2 consistently outperforms all previous Code LLMs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
StarCoder's earlier release positioned it as a foundational model, serving as the basis for several other strong/newer LLMs after fine-tuning, such as PanGu-Coder2, WizardCoder, and OctoPack.
“When comparing StarCoder [45] with StarCoder2 [51], we found that StarCoder's earlier release positioned it as a foundational model in the field, serving as the basis for several other strong/newer LLMs after fine-tuning, such as PanGu-Coder2 [70], WizardCoder [53], and OctoPack [59].”
From LessLeak-Bench: A First Investigation of Data Leakage in LLMs Across 83 Software Engineering Benchmarks (2025) · cites this paper as [70]
StarCoder and its pre-training data serve as the foundation for many other LLMs, such as PanGu-Coder2, WizardCoder, OctoPack, CodeShell, and DeepSeek-Coder.
“As a widely used open-source LLM family, StarCoder and its pre-training data serve as the foundation for many other LLMs, such as PanGu-Coder2 [70], WizardCoder [53], OctoPack [59], CodeShell [94], and DeepSeek-Coder [22].”
From LessLeak-Bench: A First Investigation of Data Leakage in LLMs Across 83 Software Engineering Benchmarks (2025) · cites this paper as [70]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
OctoPack: Instruction Tuning Code Large Language Models
Muennighoff, N., Liu, Q., Zebaze, A., Zheng, Q., Hui, B., Zhuo, T. Y., Singh, S., Tang, X., von Werra, L., & Longpre, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.07124 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Concurrently to our work, three instruction tuned Code LLMs have been proposed: PanGu-Coder2 (Shen et al., 2023), WizardCoder (Luo et al.”
MethodInfluentialMitigating Sycophancy in Large Language Models via Direct Preference Optimization
Khan, A. A., Alam, S., Wang, X., Khan, A. F., Neog, D. R., & Anwar, A. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825538 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Zhou, X., Weyssow, M., Widyasari, R., Zhang, T., He, J., Lyu, Y., Chang, J., Zhang, B., Huang, D., & Lo, D. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.06215 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shen, B., Zhang, J., Chen, T., Zan, D., Geng, B., Fu, A., Zeng, M., Yu, A., Ji, J., Zhao, J., Guo, Y., & Wang, Q.
- Affiliations
- Huawei Technologies (China) (CN)
- Peking University (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2307.14936
- OpenAlex
- W4385373622
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Keywords
- code large language models, code generation, response ranking, test feedback, teacher feedback, pre-trained model fine-tuning, LeetCode
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
