Alpha-GPT: Human-AI Interactive Alpha Mining for Quantitative Investment
Open accessAbstract
One of the most important tasks in quantitative investment research is mining new alphas (effective trading signals or factors). Traditional alpha mining methods, either hand-crafted factor synthesizing or algorithmic factor mining (e.g., search with genetic programming), have inherent limitations, especially in implementing the ideas of quants. In this work, we propose a new alpha mining paradigm by introducing human-AI interaction, and a novel prompt engineering algorithmic framework to implement this paradigm by leveraging the power of large language models. Moreover, we develop Alpha-GPT, a new interactive alpha mining system framework that provides a heuristic way to ``understand'' the ideas of quant researchers and outputs creative, insightful, and effective alphas. We demonstrate the effectiveness and advantage of Alpha-GPT via a number of alpha mining experiments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both QuantAgent and AlphaGPT demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the LLM-powered alpha mining agent system.
“Both studies demonstrates the effectiveness and efficiency of the LLM powered alpha mining agent system, which is especially valuable as alpha mining is an resource intensive job.”
From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [49]
AlphaGPT proposes a human-in-the-loop framework for alpha mining.
“In a subsequent research, AlphaGPT[49] propose a human in the loop framework for alpha mining.”
From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 17
- Authors
- Wang, S., Yuan, H., Zhou, L., Ni, L. M., Shum, H.-Y., & Guo, J.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 196-206
- arXiv
- 2308.00016
- OpenAlex
- W4416037885
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 27.68
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
- Keywords
- human-AI interaction, prompt engineering, large language models, quantitative investment, trading signals, algorithmic trading strategies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review