PreprintCited by 17Stock Market Forecasting MethodsFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesFinancial Analysis and Corporate Governance

Alpha-GPT: Human-AI Interactive Alpha Mining for Quantitative Investment

Open access
Wang, Saizhuo, Yuan, Hang, Zhou, Leon, Ni, Lionel M., Shum, Heung-Yeung, Guo, Jian·2023·arXiv

Abstract

One of the most important tasks in quantitative investment research is mining new alphas (effective trading signals or factors). Traditional alpha mining methods, either hand-crafted factor synthesizing or algorithmic factor mining (e.g., search with genetic programming), have inherent limitations, especially in implementing the ideas of quants. In this work, we propose a new alpha mining paradigm by introducing human-AI interaction, and a novel prompt engineering algorithmic framework to implement this paradigm by leveraging the power of large language models. Moreover, we develop Alpha-GPT, a new interactive alpha mining system framework that provides a heuristic way to ``understand'' the ideas of quant researchers and outputs creative, insightful, and effective alphas. We demonstrate the effectiveness and advantage of Alpha-GPT via a number of alpha mining experiments.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2308.00016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both QuantAgent and AlphaGPT demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the LLM-powered alpha mining agent system.

    “Both studies demonstrates the effectiveness and efficiency of the LLM powered alpha mining agent system, which is especially valuable as alpha mining is an resource intensive job.”

    From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [49]

  • AlphaGPT proposes a human-in-the-loop framework for alpha mining.

    “In a subsequent research, AlphaGPT[49] propose a human in the loop framework for alpha mining.”

    From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [49]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 17

Authors
Wang, S., Yuan, H., Zhou, L., Ni, L. M., Shum, H.-Y., & Guo, J.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
Pages
196-206
OpenAlex
W4416037885
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5
FWCI
27.68
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Keywords
human-AI interaction, prompt engineering, large language models, quantitative investment, trading signals, algorithmic trading strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review