PreprintCited by 2Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorTopic ModelingMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

End-to-End Beam Retrieval for Multi-Hop Question Answering

Open access

Abstract

Multi-hop question answering (QA) involves finding multiple relevant passages and step-by-step reasoning to answer complex questions, indicating a retrieve-and-read paradigm. However, previous retrievers were customized for two-hop questions, and most of them were trained separately across different hops, resulting in a lack of supervision over the entire multi-hop retrieval process and leading to poor performance in complicated scenarios beyond two hops. In this work, we introduce Beam Retrieval, an end-to-end beam retrieval framework for multi-hop QA. This approach models the multi-hop retrieval process in an end-to-end manner by jointly optimizing an encoder and two classification heads across all hops. Moreover, Beam Retrieval maintains multiple partial hypotheses of relevant passages at each step, expanding the search space and reducing the risk of missing relevant passages. To establish a complete QA system, we incorporate a supervised reader or a large language model (LLM). Experimental results demonstrate that Beam Retrieval achieves a nearly 50% improvement compared with baselines on challenging MuSiQue-Ans, and it also surpasses all previous retrievers on HotpotQA and achieves 99.9% precision on 2WikiMultiHopQA. Providing high-quality context, Beam Retrieval helps our supervised reader achieve new state-of-the-art performance and substantially improves the few-shot QA performance of LLMs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2308.08973

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Retrieval-based methods such as Self-RAG and End-to-End Beam Retrieval improve evidence selection but typically retrieve a single shared context rather than allocating different context subsets to different agents.

    “Retrieval-based methods such as Self- RAG (Asai et al., 2024) and End-to-End Beam Retrieval (Zhang et al., 2023) improve evidence selection, but they typically retrieve a single shared context rather than allocating different context subsets to different agents.”

    From RCR-Router: Efficient Role-Aware Context Routing for Multi-Agent LLM Systems with Structured Memory (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2023

    Section 3 describes Beam Retrieval selecting relevant passages, and the Introduction reports improved retrieval and downstream QA performance. Section 4.2.2 says the retrieved passages form one context, C, for a downstream reader. The paper does not study multiple agents or establish that a context is shared among them rather than allocating different subsets to each. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Danqi Chen, Adam Fisch, Jason Weston, and Antoine Bordes. 2017. Reading Wikipedia to answer open- domain questions. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1870-1879, Vancouver, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language under- standing. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Tech- nologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 4171-4186, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Yuwei Fang, Siqi Sun, Zhe Gan, Rohit Pillai, Shuo- hang Wang, and Jingjing Liu. 2020. Hierarchical graph network for multi-hop question answering. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 8823-8838, Online. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  4. James Ferguson, Matt Gardner, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Tushar Khot, and Pradeep Dasigi. 2020. IIRC: A dataset of incomplete information reading compre- hension questions. In Proceedings of the 2020 Con- ference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 1137-1147, Online. As- sociation for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  5. Ruiliu Fu, Han Wang, Xuejun Zhang, Jun Zhou, and Yonghong Yan. 2021. Decomposing complex ques- tions makes multi-hop QA easier and more inter- pretable. In Findings of the Association for Compu- tational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021, pages 169-180, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  6. Ruiliu Fu, Han Wang, Jun Zhou, and Xuejun Zhang. 2022. Na-reviewer: Reviewing the context to im- prove the error accumulation issue for multi-hop qa. Electronics Letters, 58(6):237-239. · DOI
  7. Pengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, and Weizhu Chen. 2021. Deberta: decoding-enhanced bert with disentangled attention. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021. OpenRe- view.net.
  8. Xanh Ho, Anh-Khoa Duong Nguyen, Saku Sugawara, and Akiko Aizawa. 2023. Analyzing the effective- ness of the underlying reasoning tasks in multi-hop question answering. In Findings of the Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2023, pages 1163-1180, Dubrovnik, Croatia. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  9. Xin-Yi Li, Wei-Jun Lei, and Yu-Bin Yang. 2023. From easy to hard: Two-stage selector and reader for multi- hop question answering. In ICASSP 2023 -2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 1-5. · DOI
  10. Ilya Sutskever, Oriol Vinyals, and Quoc V Le. 2014. Se- quence to sequence learning with neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 27.
  11. Harsh Trivedi, Niranjan Balasubramanian, Tushar Khot, and Ashish Sabharwal. 2022. MuSiQue: Multi- hop questions via single-hop question composition. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10:539-554. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Harsh Trivedi, Niranjan Balasubramanian, Tushar Khot, and Ashish Sabharwal. 2023. Interleaving retrieval with chain-of-thought reasoning for knowledge- intensive multi-step questions. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 10014-10037, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ming Tu, Kevin Huang, Guangtao Wang, Jing Huang, Xiaodong He, and Bowen Zhou. 2020. Select, an- swer and explain: Interpretable multi-hop reading comprehension over multiple documents. In The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence, AAAI 2020, The Thirty-Second Innovative Ap- plications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2020, The Tenth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2020, New York, NY, USA, February 7-12, 2020, pages 9073- 9080. AAAI Press.
  14. Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pier- ric Cistac, Tim Rault, Remi Louf, Morgan Funtow- icz, Joe Davison, Sam Shleifer, Patrick von Platen, Clara Ma, Yacine Jernite, Julien Plu, Canwen Xu, Teven Le Scao, Sylvain Gugger, Mariama Drame, Quentin Lhoest, and Alexander Rush. 2020. Trans- formers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, pages 38-45, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Wenhan Xiong, Xiang Li, Srini Iyer, Jingfei Du, Patrick Lewis, William Yang Wang, Yashar Mehdad, Scott Yih, Sebastian Riedel, Douwe Kiela, and Barlas Oguz. 2021. Answering complex open-domain ques- tions with multi-hop dense retrieval. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  16. Zhilin Yang, Peng Qi, Saizheng Zhang, Yoshua Bengio, William Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Christo- pher D. Manning. 2018. HotpotQA: A dataset for diverse, explainable multi-hop question answering. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empiri- cal Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2369-2380, Brussels, Belgium. Association for Com- putational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Jiajie Zhang, Shulin Cao, Tingjian Zhang, Xin Lv, Juanzi Li, Lei Hou, Jiaxin Shi, and Qi Tian. 2023. Reasoning over hierarchical question decomposition tree for explainable question answering. In Proceed- ings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 14556-14570, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  18. Yin Zhangyue, Wang Yuxin, Hu Xiannian, Wu Yiguang, Yan Hang, Zhang Xinyu, Cao Zhao, Huang Xuanjing, and Qiu Xipeng. 2023. Rethinking label smoothing on multi-hop question answering. In Proceedings of the 22nd Chinese National Conference on Compu- tational Linguistics, pages 611-623, Harbin, China. Chinese Information Processing Society of China.
  19. Chen Zhao, Chenyan Xiong, Jordan Boyd-Graber, and Hal Daumé III. 2021. Multi-step reasoning over un- structured text with beam dense retrieval. In Pro- ceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North Amer- ican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 4635-4641, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, D., Liu, Y., & Huang, S.
Affiliations
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • Tencent (China) (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386044649
Cited by
1
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
multi-hop question answering, multi-hop retrieval, large language models, HotpotQA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review