CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 23Digitalization, Law, and RegulationEthics and Social Impacts of AILaw, AI, and Intellectual Property

International Governance of Civilian AI: A Jurisdictional Certification Approach

Open access
Trager, Robert, Harack, Ben, Reuel, Anka, Carnegie, Allison, Heim, Lennart, Ho, Lewis, Kreps, Sarah, Lall, Ranjit +4 more·2023·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2308.15514arXiv 2308.15514
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This report describes trade-offs in the design of international governance arrangements for civilian artificial intelligence (AI) and presents one approach in detail. This approach represents the extension of a standards, licensing, and liability regime to the global level. We propose that states establish an International AI Organization (IAIO) to certify state jurisdictions (not firms or AI projects) for compliance with international oversight standards. States can give force to these international standards by adopting regulations prohibiting the import of goods whose supply chains embody AI from non-IAIO-certified jurisdictions. This borrows attributes from models of existing international organizations, such as the International Civilian Aviation Organization (ICAO), the International Maritime Organization (IMO), and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). States can also adopt multilateral controls on the export of AI product inputs, such as specialized hardware, to non-certified jurisdictions. Indeed, both the import and export standards could be required for certification. As international actors reach consensus on risks of and minimum standards for advanced AI, a jurisdictional certification regime could mitigate a broad range of potential harms, including threats to public safety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2308.15514

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI governance efforts often involve multistakeholder settings, providing hope that governance tools can complement technical advances to mitigate multi-agent risks.

    “The fact that AI governance (Section 4.2) efforts often involve multistakeholder settings provides hope that governance tools can complement technical advances to mitigate multi-agent risks (Reuel et al., 2024a; Trager et al., 2023).”

    From Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI (2025) · cites this paper as Trager et al., 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 58 · Cited by 23

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal. 'The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State.' In The Politics of Global Regulation , edited by Walter Mattli and Ngaire Woods, 44-88. Princeton University Press, 2009. https: //doi.org/10.1515/9781400830732.44 . · DOI
  2. Anderljung, Markus, Joslyn Barnhart, Anton Korinek, Jade Leung, Cullen O'Keefe, Jess Whittlestone, et al. 'Frontier AI Regulation: Managing Emerging Risks to Public Safety.' arXiv, 2023. arXiv:2307.03718. · arXiv
  3. Askell, Amanda, Miles Brundage, and Gillian Hadfield. 'The Role of Cooperation in Responsible AI Development.' arXiv, 2019. arXiv:1907.04534. · arXiv
  4. Aytbaev, Bulat, Dmitry Grigoriev, Vladislav Lavrenchuk, and Noah C Mayhew. 'Don't Let Nuclear Accidents Scare You Away from Nuclear Power.' Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists , August 31, 2020. https://thebulletin.org/2020/08/dont-let-nuclear-acciden ts-scare-you-away-from-nuclear-power/ .
  5. Baker, Mauricio. 'Nuclear Arms Control Verification and Lessons for AI Treaties.' arXiv, 2023. arXiv:2304.04123. · arXiv
  6. Barratt-Brown, Elizabeth P. 'Building a Monitoring and Compliance Regime Under the Montreal Protocol.' Yale Journal of International Law 16 (1991): 519-70. https: //openyls.law.yale.edu/handle/20.500.13051/6255 .
  7. Bluth, Christoph, Matthew Kroenig, Rensselaer Lee, William C. Sailor, and Matthew Fuhrmann. 'Civilian Nuclear Cooperation and the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.' International Security 35, no. 1 (2010): 184-200. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40784651 .
  8. Bohdal, Ondrej, Timothy Hospedales, Philip H. S. Torr, and Fazl Barez. 'Fairness in AI and Its Long-T erm Implications on Society.' arXiv, 2023. arXiv:2304.09826.. · arXiv
  9. Bommasani, Rishi, Drew A. Hudson, Ehsan Adeli, Russ Altman, Simran Arora, Sydney von Arx, Michael S. Bernstein, et al. 'On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models.' arXiv, 2022. arXiv:2108.07258. · arXiv
  10. Bradford, Anu. The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press, 2020.
  11. Brundage, Miles, Shahar Avin, Jack Clark, Helen Toner, Peter Eckersley, Ben Garfinkel, Allan Dafoe, et al. 'The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation.' arXiv, 2018. arXiv:1802.07228. · arXiv
  12. Brundage, Miles, Shahar Avin, Jasmine Wang, Haydn Belfield, Gretchen Krueger, Gillian Hadfield, Heidy Khlaaf, et al. 'Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims.' arXiv, 2020. arXiv:2004.07213. · arXiv
  13. Büthe, Tim, and Walter Mattli. The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.
  14. Carnegie, Allison, and Austin Carson. 'The Disclosure Dilemma: Nuclear Intelligence and International Organizations.' American Journal of Political Science 63, no. 2 (April 2019): 269-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12426 . · DOI · Paper page
  15. Chander, Anupam. 'Artificial Intelligence and Trade.' In Big Data and Global Trade Law , edited by Mira Burri, 115-27. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108919234.008 . · DOI
  16. Erdil, Ege, and Tamay Besiroglu. 'Algorithmic Progress in Computer Vision.' arXiv, 2023. arXiv:2212.05153. · arXiv
  17. 'Evolving ICAO's Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme: The Continuous Monitoring Approach.' ICAO Journal 65, no. 4 (2010): 24-25. https://www.icao.int/safety/CM AForum/Shared%20Documents/6504\_en-1.pdf .
  18. Fuhrmann, Matthew. Atomic Assistance: How 'Atoms for Peace' Programs Cause Nuclear Insecurity . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2012.
  19. Ganguli, Deep, Danny Hernandez, Liane Lovitt, Amanda Askell, Yuntao Bai, Anna Chen, Tom Conerly, et al. 'Predictability and Surprise in Large Generative Models.' In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 1747-64. FAccT '22. ACM, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533229 . · DOI · Paper page
  20. Goldstein, Josh A., Girish Sastry, Micah Musser, Renee DiResta, Matthew Gentzel, and Katerina Sedova. 'Generative Language Models and Automated Influence Operations: Emerging Threats and Potential Mitigations.' arXiv, 2023. arXiv:2301.04246. · arXiv
  21. Hazell, Julian. 'Large Language Models Can Be Used To Effectively Scale Spear Phishing Campaigns.' arXiv, 2023. arXiv:2305.06972. · arXiv
  22. Henighan, Tom, Jared Kaplan, Mor Katz, Mark Chen, Christopher Hesse, Jacob Jackson, Heewoo Jun, et al. 'Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modeling.' arXiv, 2020. arXiv:2010.14701. · arXiv
  23. Hestness, Joel, Sharan Narang, Newsha Ardalani, Gregory Diamos, Heewoo Jun, Hassan Kianinejad, Md Mostofa Ali Patwary, Yang Yang, and Yanqi Zhou. 'Deep Learning Scaling Is Predictable, Empirically.' arXiv, 2017. arXiv:1712.00409. · arXiv
  24. Ho, Lewis, Joslyn Barnhart, Robert Trager, Yoshua Bengio, Miles Brundage, Allison Carnegie, Rumman Chowdhury, et al. 'International Institutions for Advanced AI.' arXiv, 2023. arXiv:2307.04699. · arXiv
  25. Hoffmann, Jordan, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Diego de Las Casas, et al. 'Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models.' arXiv, 2022. arXiv:2203.15556. · arXiv
  26. Hoffman, Steven J., Prativa Baral, Susan Rogers Van Katwyk, Lathika Sritharan, Matthew Hughsam, Harkanwal Randhawa, Gigi Lin, et al. 'International Treaties Have Mostly Failed to Produce Their Intended Effects.' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, no. 32 (August 9, 2022): e2122854119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.21228 54119 . · DOI
  27. Huang, Seaton, Helen Toner, Zac Haluza, and Rogier Creemers, trans. 'Translation: Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services (Draft for Comment) - April 2023,' April 12, 2023. https://digichina.stanford.edu/work/translatio n-measures-for-the-management-of-generative-artificial-intelligence-s ervices-draft-for-comment-april-2023/ .
  28. Jannai, Daniel, Amos Meron, Barak Lenz, Yoav Levine, and Yoav Shoham. 'Human or Not? A Gamified Approach to the Turing Test.' arXiv, 2023. arXiv:2305.20010. · arXiv
  29. Jumper, John, Richard Evans, Alexander Pritzel, Tim Green, Michael Figurnov, Olaf Ronneberger, Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool, et al. 'Highly Accurate Protein Structure Prediction with AlphaFold.' Nature 596, no. 7873 (2021): 583-89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s4 1586-021-03819-2 . · DOI
  30. Khan, Saif M., and Alexander Mann. 'AI Chips: What They Are and Why They Matter.' Center for Security and Emerging Technology, 2020. https://doi.org/10.51593/20190014 . · DOI
  31. Lall, Ranjit. Making International Institutions Work: The Politics of Performance . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009216265 . · DOI
  32. Laplante, Phil, and Ben Amaba. 'Artificial Intelligence in Critical Infrastructure Systems.' Computer 54, no. 10 (2021): 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2021.3055892 . · DOI
  33. Li, Zihao. 'Why the European AI Act Transparency Obligation Is Insufficient.' Nature Machine Intelligence 5, no. 6 (2023): 559-60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00672-y . · DOI
  34. Manheim, Karl, and Lyric Kaplan. 'Artificial Intelligence: Risks to Privacy and Democracy.' Yale Journal of Law and Technology 21 (2019): 106-88. https://yjolt.org/artificial -intelligence-risks-privacy-and-democracy .
  35. Martínez, Eric. 'Re-Evaluating GPT-4's Bar Exam Performance.' SSRN, 2023. https: //doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4441311 . · DOI
  36. Mitchell, Margaret, Simone Wu, Andrew Zaldivar, Parker Barnes, Lucy Vasserman, Ben Hutchinson, Elena Spitzer, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, and Timnit Gebru. 'Model Cards for Model Reporting.' In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 220-29. FAT* '19. ACM, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.32 87596 . · DOI
  37. Mökander, Jakob, Jonas Schuett, Hannah Rose Kirk, and Luciano Floridi. 'Auditing Large Language Models: A Three-Layered Approach.' AI and Ethics , 2023. https://doi.or g/10.1007/s43681-023-00289-2 . · DOI · Paper page
  38. Nance, Mark T. 'The Regime That FATF Built: An Introduction to the Financial Action Task Force.' Crime, Law and Social Change 69, no. 2 (2018): 109-29. https://doi.org/10.1 007/s10611-017-9747-6 .
  39. Ngo, Richard, Lawrence Chan, and Sören Mindermann. 'The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspective.' arXiv, February 22, 2023. arXiv:2209.00626. · arXiv
  40. Nichols, Thomas M. No Use: Nuclear Weapons and U.S. National Security . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.
  41. OpenAI. 'GPT-4 Technical Report.' arXiv, 2023. arXiv:2303.08774. · arXiv
  42. Perez, Ethan, Sam Ringer, Kamil˙ e Lukoši¯ ut˙ e, Karina Nguyen, Edwin Chen, Scott Heiner, Craig Pettit, et al. 'Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations.' arXiv, December 19, 2022. arXiv:2212.09251. · arXiv
  43. Raji, Inioluwa Deborah, Andrew Smart, Rebecca N. White, Margaret Mitchell, Timnit Gebru, Ben Hutchinson, Jamila Smith-Loud, Daniel Theron, and Parker Barnes. 'Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing.' arXiv, 2020. arXiv:2001.00973. · arXiv
  44. Roehrlich, Elisabeth. Inspectors for Peace: A History of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Baltimore: JHU Press, 2022.
  45. Russell, Stuart. Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control . Penguin, 2019.
  46. Schaeffer, Rylan, Brando Miranda, and Sanmi Koyejo. 'Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?' arXiv, 2023. arXiv:2304.15004. · arXiv
  47. Schuett, Jonas. 'Defining the Scope of AI Regulations.' Legal Priorities Project Working Paper No. 9. 2021. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3453632 .
  48. Sevilla, Jaime, Lennart Heim, Anson Ho, Tamay Besiroglu, Marius Hobbhahn, and Pablo Villalobos. 'Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learning.' arXiv, 2022. arXiv:2202.05924. · arXiv
  49. Shavit, Yonadav. 'What Does It Take to Catch a Chinchilla? Verifying Rules on Large-Scale Neural Network Training Via Compute Monitoring.' arXiv, 2023. arXiv:2303.11341. · arXiv
  50. Sheng, Ying, Lianmin Zheng, Binhang Yuan, Zhuohan Li, Max Ryabinin, Daniel Y. Fu, Zhiqiang Xie, et al. 'FlexGen: High-Throughput Generative Inference of Large Language Models with a Single GPU.' arXiv, 2023. arXiv:2303.06865. · arXiv
  51. Shevlane, Toby. 'Structured Access: An Emerging Paradigm for Safe AI Deployment.' arXiv, 2022. arXiv:2201.05159. · arXiv
  52. Siegmann, Charlotte, and Markus Anderljung. 'The Brussels Effect and Artificial Intelligence: How EU Regulation Will Impact the Global AI Market.' arXiv, 2022. arXiv:2208.12645. · arXiv
  53. Temtsin, Sharon, Diane Proudfoot, and Christoph Bartneck. 'A Bona Fide Turing Test.' In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction , 250-52. HAI '22. ACM, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3527188.3563918 . · DOI
  54. Urbina, Fabio, Filippa Lentzos, Cédric Invernizzi, and Sean Ekins. 'Dual Use of ArtificialIntelligence-Powered Drug Discovery.' Nature Machine Intelligence 4, no. 3 (2022): 189-91. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00465-9 . · DOI · Paper page
  55. Villalobos, Pablo. 'Scaling Laws Literature Review.' Epoch, 2023. https://epochai.org/bl og/scaling-laws-literature-review .
  56. Wei, Jason, Yi Tay, Rishi Bommasani, Colin Raffel, Barret Zoph, Sebastian Borgeaud, Dani Yogatama, et al. 'Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models.' arXiv, 2022. arXiv:2206.07682. · arXiv
  57. Westerwinter, Oliver. 'Transnational Public-Private Governance Initiatives in World Politics: Introducing a New Dataset.' The Review of International Organizations 16, no. 1 (2021): 137-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09366-w . · DOI
  58. Ziegler, Andreas R., and David Sifonios. 'The Assessment of Environmental Risks and the Regulation of Process and Production Methods (PPMs) in International Trade Law.' In Risk and the Regulation of Uncertainty in International Law , edited by Mónika Ambrus, Rosemary Rayfuse, and Wouter Werner, 219-36. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017.

Authors
Trager, R., Harack, B., Reuel, A., Carnegie, A., Heim, L., Ho, L., Kreps, S., Lall, R., Larter, O., hÉigeartaigh, S. Ó., Staffell, S., & Villalobos, J. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Centre for the Governance of AI (GB)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Trager, Robert
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2308.15514
arXiv
2308.15514
OpenAlex
W4386988489
Cited by
23
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Keywords
AI governance, AI licensing, AI liability, international standards, public safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review