TradingGPT: Multi-Agent System with Layered Memory and Distinct Characters for Enhanced Financial Trading Performance
Open accessAbstract
Large Language Models (LLMs), prominently highlighted by the recent evolution in the Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT) series, have displayed significant prowess across various domains, such as aiding in healthcare diagnostics and curating analytical business reports. The efficacy of GPTs lies in their ability to decode human instructions, achieved through comprehensively processing historical inputs as an entirety within their memory system. Yet, the memory processing of GPTs does not precisely emulate the hierarchical nature of human memory. This can result in LLMs struggling to prioritize immediate and critical tasks efficiently. To bridge this gap, we introduce an innovative LLM multi-agent framework endowed with layered memories. We assert that this framework is well-suited for stock and fund trading, where the extraction of highly relevant insights from hierarchical financial data is imperative to inform trading decisions. Within this framework, one agent organizes memory into three distinct layers, each governed by a custom decay mechanism, aligning more closely with human cognitive processes. Agents can also engage in inter-agent debate. In financial trading contexts, LLMs serve as the decision core for trading agents, leveraging their layered memory system to integrate multi-source historical actions and market insights. This equips them to navigate financial changes, formulate strategies, and debate with peer agents about investment decisions. Another standout feature of our approach is to equip agents with individualized trading traits, enhancing memory diversity and decision robustness. These sophisticated designs boost the system's responsiveness to historical trades and real-time market signals, ensuring superior automated trading accuracy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most recently proposed multimodal LLMs have not been specifically trained and evaluated on financial visual data such as Kline charts and volume charts.
“While recently proposed multimodal LLMs such as LLaVA [28], GPT-4v[35] possesses the capability to processing visual data, most of these models have not been specifically trained and evaluated on financial visual data such as Kline charts, volume charts.”
From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [28]
News data from reputable sources is extensively used in various studies to stay up-to-date with the real-world financial market.
“This type of data is extensively used in various studies [20, 27, 51, 53, 57] to stay up-to-date with the real-world financial market.”
From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
In finance, memory can store financial knowledge, market information, and successful experiences.
“Some previous works also apply LLM-based agents in the finance domain, whose memory can store financial knowledge [113], market information [154, 156], and successful experiences [157, 155].”
From A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model-based Agents (2025) · cites this paper as [154]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 12
- Authors
- Li, Y., Yu, Y., Li, H., Chen, Z., & Khashanah, K.
- Affiliations
- Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- arXiv
- 2309.03736
- OpenAlex
- W4386555316
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- multi-agent systems, large language models, financial trading, stock trading, trading agents, algorithmic trading, hierarchical memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review