The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Can large-scale vocoded spoofed data improve speech spoofing countermeasure with a self-supervised front end?
Open accessAbstract
A speech spoofing countermeasure (CM) that discriminates between unseen spoofed and bona fide data requires diverse training data. While many datasets use spoofed data generated by speech synthesis systems, it was recently found that data vocoded by neural vocoders were also effective as the spoofed training data. Since many neural vocoders are fast in building and generation, this study used multiple neural vocoders and created more than 9,000 hours of vocoded data on the basis of the VoxCeleb2 corpus. This study investigates how this large-scale vocoded data can improve spoofing countermeasures that use data-hungry self-supervised learning (SSL) models. Experiments demonstrated that the overall CM performance on multiple test sets improved when using features extracted by an SSL model continually trained on the vocoded data. Further improvement was observed when using a new SSL distilled from the two SSLs before and after the continual training. The CM with the distilled SSL outperformed the previous best model on challenging unseen test sets, including the ASVspoof 2019 logical access, WaveFake, and In-the-Wild.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SSL models currently achieve the best results when faced with generalizability.
“As SSL models currently achieve the best results when faced with generalizability, in the open condition, we tested different SSL models as feature extraction method.”
From Robust audio deepfake detection: exploring front-/back-end combinations and data augmentation strategies for the ASVspoof5 Challenge (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
The model in [2] consists of an SSL-based front-end and a neural network back-end as classifier.
“Their model consists of an SSL-based front-end and neuronal network back-end as classifier.”
From Robust audio deepfake detection: exploring front-/back-end combinations and data augmentation strategies for the ASVspoof5 Challenge (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
[2] developed the SOTA detector on the in-the-wild dataset achieving an EER of 4.07%.
“For example, [2] developed the SOTA detector on the in-the-wild dataset achieving an EER of 4.07%.”
From Robust audio deepfake detection: exploring front-/back-end combinations and data augmentation strategies for the ASVspoof5 Challenge (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
Using the in-the-wild dataset as test set, mainly self-supervised learning (SSL)-based detectors proved to be the best performing methods on real-world data.
“Using the in-the-wild dataset as test set, mainly self-supervised learning (SSL)-based detectors proved to be the best performing methods on such real-world data.”
From Robust audio deepfake detection: exploring front-/back-end combinations and data augmentation strategies for the ASVspoof5 Challenge (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schäfer, K., Choi, J.-E., & Neu, M. (2024) · The Automatic Speaker Verification Spoofing Countermeasures Workshop (ASVspoof 2024) · doi:10.21437/asvspoof.2024-9 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., & Yamagishi, J.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Informatics (JP)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 10311-10315
- ISSN
- 1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2309.06014
- OpenAlex
- W4392910562
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21H04906)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- self-supervised learning, continuous training, knowledge distillation, VoxCeleb2, ASVspoof 2019, speaker verification security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review