Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 4Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningTeaching and Learning Programming

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

ActiveAI: Introducing AI Literacy for Middle School Learners with Goal-based Scenario Learning

Open access
Tseng, Ying Jui, Yadav, Gautam·2023·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2309.12337arXiv 2309.12337
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The ActiveAI project addresses key challenges in AI education for grades 7-9 students by providing an engaging AI literacy learning experience based on the AI4K12 knowledge framework. Utilizing learning science mechanisms such as goal-based scenarios, immediate feedback, project-based learning, and intelligent agents, the app incorporates a variety of learner inputs like sliders, steppers, and collectors to enhance understanding. In these courses, students work on real-world scenarios like analyzing sentiment in social media comments. This helps them learn to effectively engage with AI systems and develop their ability to evaluate AI-generated output. The Learning Engineering Process (LEP) guided the project's creation and data instrumentation, focusing on design and impact. The project is currently in the implementation stage, leveraging the intelligent tutor design principles for app development. The extended abstract presents the foundational design and development, with further evaluation and research to be conducted in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2309.12337

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Visualizing the Learning Engineering Process: A Comprehensive Model for Designing and Implementing ActiveAI (Kessler et al., 2022)
Figure 1 Visualizing the Learning Engineering Process: A Comprehensive Model for Designing and Implementing ActiveAI (Kessler et al., 2022)CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 2 Students employ a collector to categorize 10 images into two classes - "sleeping" and "playing" to create a training set for a classifier (left side). In another learning activity, they will manipulate a slider to adjust the number of training examples, thereby observing how this modification influences the accuracy of their automated tag system on a given test dataset of 8 images (right side).
Figure 2 Students employ a collector to categorize 10 images into two classes - "sleeping" and "playing" to create a training set for a classifier (left side). In another learning activity, they will manipulate a slider to adjust the number of training examples, thereby observing how this modification influences the accuracy of their automated tag system on a given test dataset of 8 images (right side).CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 3 Students use a stepper to modify the number of words considered in the sentiment analysis, enabling them to explore how using different word groups affects sentiment analysis results sequentially and gain insight into how machines 'understand' sentiment.
Figure 3 Students use a stepper to modify the number of words considered in the sentiment analysis, enabling them to explore how using different word groups affects sentiment analysis results sequentially and gain insight into how machines 'understand' sentiment.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Sewall, J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2006). The cognitive tutor authoring tools (CTAT): Preliminary evaluation of efficiency gains. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 8th International Conference, ITS 2006, Jhongli, Taiwan, June 26-30, 2006. Proceedings 8 (pp. 61-70). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  2. Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1997). Intelligent tutoring systems. In Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 849-874). North-Holland.
  3. Kessler, A., Craig, S.D., Goodell, J., Kurzweil, D., & Greenwald, S.W. (2022). Learning Engineering is a Process. In Goodell & Kolodner (Eds.), Learning Engineering Toolkit: Evidence-based Practices from the Learning Sciences, Instructional Design, and Beyond. Routledge: New York and London.
  4. Ng, D.T.K., Leung, J.K.L., Su, M.J., Yim, I.H.Y., Qiao, M.S., Chu, S.K.W. (2022). AI Literacy Education in Secondary Schools. In: AI Literacy in K-16 Classrooms. Springer, Cham.
  5. Rodríguez-García, J. D., Moreno-León, J., Román-González, M., & Robles, G. (2021). Introducing Artificial Intelligence Fundamentals with LearningML: Artificial Intelligence made easy. In TEEM'20: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 18-20).
  6. Schank, R. C., Fano, A., Bell, B., & Jona, M. (1994). The design of goal-based scenarios. The journal of the learning sciences, 3(4), 305-345.
  7. Torrence, K., (2022, October 27) Building Better VR Solutions with Learning Engineering Practices (Conference presentation). DevLearn 2022 Conference & Expo. Las Vegas, NV, USA
  8. Touretzky, D., Gardner-McCune, C., & Seehorn, D. (2022). Machine Learning and the Five Big Ideas in AI. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-34.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Tseng, Y. J., & Yadav, G.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
ORCID
Tseng, Ying Jui
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2309.12337
arXiv
2309.12337
OpenAlex
W4387030569
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
Keywords
AI literacy, artificial intelligence in education, junior high school students, intelligent tutoring systems, learning engineering, project-based learning, sentiment analysis, educational app design, learning sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review