The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Large Language Models for Software Engineering: Survey and Open Problems
Open accessAbstract
This paper provides a survey of the emerging area of Large Language Models (LLMs) for Software Engineering (SE). It also sets out open research challenges for the application of LLMs to technical problems faced by software engineers. LLMs' emergent properties bring novelty and creativity with applications right across the spectrum of Software Engineering activities including coding, design, requirements, repair, refactoring, performance improvement, documentation and analytics. However, these very same emergent properties also pose significant technical challenges; we need techniques that can reliably weed out incorrect solutions, such as hallucinations. Our survey reveals the pivotal role that hybrid techniques (traditional SE plus LLMs) have to play in the development and deployment of reliable, efficient and effective LLM-based SE.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is no research that directly examines the impact of GenAI on creativity in software development.
“Despite the plethora of new publications that have continue to emerge on the topic of LLMs and GenAI in software development, then, there is no research that directly examines the impact of GenAI on creativity in software development.”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity in Software Development: A Research Agenda (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
Two recent literature reviews find the majority of research on LLMs in software engineering has focused on code-generation tasks, followed by testing.
“Two recent literature reviews [36, 54] find the majority of research has focused on code-generation tasks, followed by testing.”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity in Software Development: A Research Agenda (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
Neither of the two recent literature reviews mentions studies that directly target creativity.
“Neither review mentions studies that directly target creativity, although it is indirectly hinted at when discussing potential research into hallucinations and whether the hallucinations could be harnessed in some way, e.g., to identify new features [36].”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity in Software Development: A Research Agenda (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
ChatGPT is the most widely adopted LLM in code generation in the literature.
“ChatGPT is the most widely adopted LLM in code generation in the literature [15, 16, 23, 40, 42, 63, 70]”
From An Empirical Study of the Non-Determinism of ChatGPT in Code Generation (2025) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Empirical Study of the Non-Determinism of ChatGPT in Code Generation
Ouyang, S., Zhang, J. M., Harman, M., & Wang, M. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3697010 · Cited by 258
Self-citationA Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model-based Agents
Zhang, Z., Dai, Q., Bo, X., Ma, C., Li, R., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Dong, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3748302 · Cited by 592
The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity in Software Development: A Research Agenda
Jackson, V., Vasilescu, B., Russo, D., Ralph, P., Prikladnicki, R., Izadi, M., D’Angelo, S., Inman, S., Andrade, A., & van der Hoek, A. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3708523 · Cited by 23
A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agents
Zhang, Z., Bo, X., Ma, C., Li, R., Chen, X., Dai, Q., Zhu, J., Dong, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.13501 · Cited by 149
An Empirical Study of the Non-determinism of ChatGPT in Code Generation
Ouyang, S., Zhang, J. M., Harman, M., & Wang, M. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.02828
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, A., Gokkaya, B., Harman, M., Lyubarskiy, M., Sengupta, S., Yoo, S., & Zhang, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Meta (United States) (US)
- Meta (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- King's College London (GB)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 31-53
- arXiv
- 2310.03533
- OpenAlex
- W4392414327
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 179 · 2025: 244 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 134.41
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Future of Software Engineering (ICSE-FoSE) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Keywords
- large language models, software engineering, code generation, program repair, refactoring, requirements engineering, software documentation, performance improvement, hallucination mitigation, hybrid technique, emergent properties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
