Integrating Stock Features and Global Information via Large Language Models for Enhanced Stock Return Prediction
Open accessAbstract
The remarkable achievements and rapid advancements of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and GPT-4 have showcased their immense potential in quantitative investment. Traders can effectively leverage these LLMs to analyze financial news and predict stock returns accurately. However, integrating LLMs into existing quantitative models presents two primary challenges: the insufficient utilization of semantic information embedded within LLMs and the difficulties in aligning the latent information within LLMs with pre-existing quantitative stock features. We propose a novel framework consisting of two components to surmount these challenges. The first component, the Local-Global (LG) model, introduces three distinct strategies for modeling global information. These approaches are grounded respectively on stock features, the capabilities of LLMs, and a hybrid method combining the two paradigms. The second component, Self-Correlated Reinforcement Learning (SCRL), focuses on aligning the embeddings of financial news generated by LLMs with stock features within the same semantic space. By implementing our framework, we have demonstrated superior performance in Rank Information Coefficient and returns, particularly compared to models relying only on stock features in the China A-share market.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLM agents have achieved annualized return ranging from 15% to 30% over the strongest baseline during backtesting period with real market data.
“Our survey[8, 29, 53, 57] shows that LLM agents have achieved annualized return ranging from 15% to 30% over the strongest baseline during backtesting period with real market data, which demonstrates the great potential of using LLM in financial trading.”
From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
The Backtesting section describes a 2022 test using market data, and the reported results show the LLM-based SCRL-LG model outperforming the other models. However, the table reports a 28.8% annual return for SCRL-LG versus 21.6% for the strongest comparator, not an annualized return 15%–30% above that comparator. The paper also describes an LLM-assisted prediction model rather than an autonomous LLM trading agent; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Abe and Nakagawa, 2020] Masaya Abe and Kei Nakagawa. Cross-sectional stock price prediction using deep learn- ing for actual investment management. In Proceedings of the 2020 Asia Service Sciences and Software Engineering Conference, pages 9-15, 2020.
- Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ry- der, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhari- wal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing sys- tems, 33:1877-1901, 2020.
- Yiming Cui, Ziqing Yang, and Xin Yao. Efficient and effective text encoding for chinese llama and alpaca. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08177, 2023. · arXiv
- Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Ken- ton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understand- ing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018. · arXiv
- Yitong Duan, Lei Wang, Qizhong Zhang, and Jian Li. Factorvae: A probabilistic dynamic fac- tor model based on variational autoencoder for predicting cross-sectional stock returns. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 36, pages 4468-4476, 2022.
- Eugene F Fama and Kenneth R French. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of financial economics, 33(1):3-56, 1993.
- Eugene F Fama and Kenneth R French. A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of fi- nancial economics, 116(1):1-22, 2015.
- Stefano Giglio, Bryan Kelly, and Dacheng Xiu. Factor models, machine learning, and asset pricing. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 14:337- 368, 2022.
- Shihao Gu, Bryan Kelly, and Dacheng Xiu. Empirical asset pricing via machine learning. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(5):2223-2273, 2020.
- Ishu Gupta, Tarun Kumar Madan, Sukhman Singh, and Ashutosh Kumar Singh. Hisa-smfm: historical and sentiment analysis based stock market fore- casting model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.08143, 2022. · arXiv
- Ziniu Hu, Weiqing Liu, Jiang Bian, Xu- anzhe Liu, and Tie-Yan Liu. Listening to chaotic whispers: A deep learning framework for news-oriented stock trend prediction. In Proceedings of the eleventh ACM interna- tional conference on web search and data mining, pages 261-269, 2018.
- Yudong Li, Yuqing Zhang, Zhe Zhao, Lin- lin Shen, Weijie Liu, Weiquan Mao, and Hui Zhang. CSL: A large-scale Chinese scientific literature dataset. In Pro- ceedings of the 29th International Conference on Compu- tational Linguistics, pages 3917-3923, Gyeongju, Repub- lic of Korea, October 2022. International Committee on Computational Linguistics.
- Liu et al., 2019] Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692, 2019. · arXiv
- Lopez-Lira and Tang, 2023] Alejandro Lopez-Lira and Yuehua Tang. Can chatgpt forecast stock price move- ments? return predictability and large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07619, 2023. · arXiv
- Kei Nakagawa, Masaya Abe, and Junpei Komiyama. Ric-nn: A robust transferable deep learning framework for cross-sectional investment strat- egy. In 2020 IEEE 7th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), pages 370-379. IEEE, 2020.
- Schulman J, 2017] et al. Schulman J. Proximal policy opti- mization algorithms. ArXiv, 1707.06347, 2017. · arXiv
- Touvron et al., 2023] Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gau- tier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Tim- othée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Ham- bro, Faisal Azhar, et al. Llama: Open and efficient founda- tion language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023. · arXiv
- Shengting Wu, Yuling Liu, Ziran Zou, and Tien-Hsiung Weng. S i lstm: stock price prediction based on multiple data sources and sentiment analysis. Connec- tion Science, 34(1):44-62, 2022.
- Qianqian Xie, Weiguang Han, Yanzhao Lai, Min Peng, and Jimin Huang. The wall street neo- phyte: A zero-shot analysis of chatgpt over multimodal stock movement prediction challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05351, 2023. · arXiv
- Liang Xu, Xuanwei Zhang, and Qianqian Dong. Cluecorpus2020: A large-scale chinese corpus for pre-training language model. ArXiv, abs/2003.01355, 2020. · arXiv
- Yogo, 2006] Motohiro Yogo. A consumption-based expla- nation of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(2):539-580, 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey
Ding, H., Li, Y., Wang, J., Chen, H., Guo, D., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 9th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business · doi:10.1145/3802463.3802475 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework
Xiao, Y., Sun, E., Luo, D., & Wang, W. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.20138 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Classical RL methods are also used in trading frameworks that integrate LLM-generated embeddings with stock features, trained via algorithms like Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) (Ding et al., 2023; Schulman et al., 2017).”
- Authors
- Ding, Y., Jia, S., Ma, T., Mao, B., Zhou, X., Li, L., & Han, D.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- arXiv
- 2310.05627
- OpenAlex
- W4387560242
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
- Keywords
- stock return prediction, large language models, business news, quantitative investment, A-share market
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
