Controllable Chest X-Ray Report Generation from Longitudinal Representations
Open accessAbstract
Radiology reports are detailed text descriptions of the content of medical scans. Each report describes the presence/absence and location of relevant clinical findings, commonly including comparison with prior exams of the same patient to describe how they evolved. Radiology reporting is a time-consuming process, and scan results are often subject to delays. One strategy to speed up reporting is to integrate automated reporting systems, however clinical deployment requires high accuracy and interpretability. Previous approaches to automated radiology reporting generally do not provide the prior study as input, precluding comparison which is required for clinical accuracy in some types of scans, and offer only unreliable methods of interpretability. Therefore, leveraging an existing visual input format of anatomical tokens, we introduce two novel aspects: (1) longitudinal representation learning -- we input the prior scan as an additional input, proposing a method to align, concatenate and fuse the current and prior visual information into a joint longitudinal representation which can be provided to the multimodal report generation model; (2) sentence-anatomy dropout -- a training strategy for controllability in which the report generator model is trained to predict only sentences from the original report which correspond to the subset of anatomical regions given as input. We show through in-depth experiments on the MIMIC-CXR dataset how the proposed approach achieves state-of-the-art results while enabling anatomy-wise controllable report generation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The paper's qualitative evaluation approach differs from most existing works that primarily ask experts to rate overall report quality via a Likert scale, provide total error counts/categorisation, or engage in comparison rankings.
“By inviting a domain expert to review and adapt individual phrase outputs, our approach to qualitative evaluation of report generation differs from most existing works that primarily ask experts to rate overall report quality via a (Likert-) scale; 59 provide total error counts/ categorisation; 48,60 or engage in comparison rankings across different report candidates.61”
From MAIRA-2: Grounded Radiology Report Generation (2024) · cites this paper as [60]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MAIRA-2: Grounded Radiology Report Generation
Bannur, S., Bouzid, K., Castro, D. C., Schwaighofer, A., Thieme, A., Bond-Taylor, S., Ilse, M., Pérez-García, F., Salvatelli, V., Sharma, H., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.04449 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“…reports from radiology images has become subject to increasing research interest (Sloan et al., 2024; Zhou et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2024; Tu et al., 2024; Hyland et al., 2023; Jeong et al., 2023; Tanida et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2024; Müller et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2023; Li et al., 2023).”
Background
- Authors
- Serra, F. D., Wang, C., Deligianni, F., Dalton, J., & O'Neil, A. Q.
- Affiliations
- Canon Medical Research Europe (United Kingdom) (GB)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Serra, Francesco Dalla
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 4891-4904
- arXiv
- 2310.05881
- OpenAlex
- W4389518840
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- automated radiology report generation, chest radiography, controllable text generation, MIMIC-CXR
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review