The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Graph Neural Networks and Applied Linear Algebra
Open accessAbstract
Sparse matrix computations are ubiquitous in scientific computing. With the recent interest in scientific machine learning, it is natural to ask how sparse matrix computations can leverage neural networks (NN). Unfortunately, multi-layer perceptron (MLP) neural networks are typically not natural for either graph or sparse matrix computations. The issue lies with the fact that MLPs require fixed-sized inputs while scientific applications generally generate sparse matrices with arbitrary dimensions and a wide range of nonzero patterns (or matrix graph vertex interconnections). While convolutional NNs could possibly address matrix graphs where all vertices have the same number of nearest neighbors, a more general approach is needed for arbitrary sparse matrices, e.g. arising from discretized partial differential equations on unstructured meshes. Graph neural networks (GNNs) are one approach suitable to sparse matrices. GNNs define aggregation functions (e.g., summations) that operate on variable size input data to produce data of a fixed output size so that MLPs can be applied. The goal of this paper is to provide an introduction to GNNs for a numerical linear algebra audience. Concrete examples are provided to illustrate how many common linear algebra tasks can be accomplished using GNNs. We focus on iterative methods that employ computational kernels such as matrix-vector products, interpolation, relaxation methods, and strength-of-connection measures. Our GNN examples include cases where parameters are determined a-priori as well as cases where parameters must be learned. The intent with this article is to help computational scientists understand how GNNs can be used to adapt machine learning concepts to computational tasks associated with sparse matrices. It is hoped that this understanding will stimulate data-driven extensions of classical sparse linear algebra tasks.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The static Pearson-correlation-based adjacency matrix assumed fixed spatial relationships, failing to account for the dynamic nature of atmospheric processes, such as shifting jet streams or evolving El Ni˜ no-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phases [26, 27].”
From Advancing Heatwave Forecasting via Distribution Informed-Graph Neural Networks (DI-GNNs): Integrating Extreme Value Theory with GNNs (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chishtie, F. A., Brunet, D., White, R. H., Michelson, D., Jiang, J., Lucas, V., Ruboonga, E., Imaash, S., Westland, M., Chui, T., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.13496
“Incorporating dynamic graph representations to account for evolving spatial and temporal dependencies could extend its performance to subseasonal and seasonal time scales [26, 27].”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, N. S., Cyr, E. C., Ohm, P., Siefert, C. M., & Tuminaro, R. S.
- Affiliations
- West Texas A&M University (US)
- Sandia National Laboratories (US)
- RIKEN Center for Computational Science (JP)
- Sandia National Laboratories California (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 141-175
- ISSN
- 0036-1445 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2310.14084
- OpenAlex
- W4407197699
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- SIAM Review (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DENA0003525, 0003525)
- Office of Science (DE-NA0003525)
- National Nuclear Security Administration (DENA-0003525)
- Sandia National Laboratories (DE‐NA,0003525)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Matrix Theory and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
- Keywords
- graph neural networks, sparse matrix computations, scientific machine learning, aggregation operators, iterative methods, multigrid methods, matrix-vector multiplication, interpolation, relaxation techniques, numerical linear algebra, unstructured grid, partial differential equations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graph Neural Networks and Applied Linear Algebra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2310.14084
- The paper
- Moore, N. S., Cyr, E. C., Ohm, P., Siefert, C. M., & Tuminaro, R. S. (2023). Graph Neural Networks and Applied Linear Algebra. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2310.14084