The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Cross-Domain HAR: Few Shot Transfer Learning for Human Activity Recognition
Open accessAbstract
The ubiquitous availability of smartphones and smartwatches with integrated inertial measurement units (IMUs) enables straightforward capturing of human activities. For specific applications of sensor based human activity recognition (HAR), however, logistical challenges and burgeoning costs render especially the ground truth annotation of such data a difficult endeavor, resulting in limited scale and diversity of datasets. Transfer learning, i.e., leveraging publicly available labeled datasets to first learn useful representations that can then be fine-tuned using limited amounts of labeled data from a target domain, can alleviate some of the performance issues of contemporary HAR systems. Yet they can fail when the differences between source and target conditions are too large and/ or only few samples from a target application domain are available, each of which are typical challenges in real-world human activity recognition scenarios. In this paper, we present an approach for economic use of publicly available labeled HAR datasets for effective transfer learning. We introduce a novel transfer learning framework, Cross-Domain HAR, which follows the teacher-student self-training paradigm to more effectively recognize activities with very limited label information. It bridges conceptual gaps between source and target domains, including sensor locations and type of activities. Through our extensive experimental evaluation on a range of benchmark datasets, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach for practically relevant few shot activity recognition scenarios. We also present a detailed analysis into how the individual components of our framework affect downstream performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DeepConvLSTM remains a strong baseline and is commonly utilized in contemporary HAR works.
“A combination of convolutional and recurrent layers is proposed in DeepConvLSTM [144], which, even today, remains a strong baseline and is commonly utilized in contemporary HAR works [81,189].”
From Past, Present, and Future of Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables: A Surveying Tutorial on a Still Challenging Task (2025) · cites this paper as [189]
Section 5.3.2 reports that DeepConvLSTM outperformed a simpler convolutional encoder on four of six target datasets, supporting its description as a strong HAR model. The paper uses it as an encoder, but the passages do not establish that it is commonly used across contemporary HAR works. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- Kerem Altun, Billur Barshan, and Orkun Tunçel. 2010. Comparative study on classifying human activities with miniature inertial and magnetic sensors. Pattern Recognition 43, 10 (2010), 3605-3620.
- Sizhe An, Ganapati Bhat, Suat Gumussoy, and Umit Ogras. 2020. Transfer learning for human activity recognition using representational analysis of neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.04479 (2020). · arXiv
- Marc Bachlin, Meir Plotnik, Daniel Roggen, Inbal Maidan, Jeffrey M Hausdorff, Nir Giladi, and Gerhard Troster. 2009. Wearable assistant for Parkinson's disease patients with the freezing of gait symptom. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 14, 2 (2009), 436-446.
- Oresti Banos, Rafael Garcia, Juan A Holgado-Terriza, Miguel Damas, Hector Pomares, Ignacio Rojas, Alejandro Saez, and Claudia Villalonga. 2014. mHealthDroid: a novel framework for agile development of mobile health applications. In International workshop on ambient assisted living. Springer, 91-98.
- Mehrab Bin Morshed, Koustuv Saha, Munmun De Choudhury, Gregory D Abowd, and Thomas Plötz. 2020. Measuring self-esteem with passive sensing. In Proceedings of the 14th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 363-366.
- Charikleia Chatzaki, Matthew Pediaditis, George Vavoulas, and Manolis Tsiknakis. 2016. Human daily activity and fall recognition using a smartphone's acceleration sensor. In International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health. Springer, 100-118.
- Ting Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, and Geoffrey Hinton. 2020. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 1597-1607.
- Xinlei Chen and Kaiming He. 2021. Exploring simple siamese representation learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 15750-15758.
- Diane Cook, Kyle D Feuz, and Narayanan C Krishnan. 2013. Transfer learning for activity recognition: A survey. Knowledge and information systems 36 (2013), 537-556.
- Ekin D Cubuk, Barret Zoph, Dandelion Mane, Vijay Vasudevan, and Quoc V Le. 2019. Autoaugment: Learning augmentation strategies from data. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 113-123.
- Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. 2009. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Ieee, 248-255.
- Renjie Ding, Xue Li, Lanshun Nie, Jiazhen Li, Xiandong Si, Dianhui Chu, Guozhong Liu, and Dechen Zhan. 2018. Empirical study and improvement on deep transfer learning for human activity recognition. Sensors 19, 1 (2018), 57.
- Linus Ericsson, Henry Gouk, Chen Change Loy, and Timothy M Hospedales. 2022. Self-supervised representation learning: Introduction, advances, and challenges. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 39, 3 (2022), 42-62.
- Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. 2017. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 1126-1135.
- Mohamed Farouk Abdel Hady and Friedhelm Schwenker. 2013. Semi-supervised learning. Handbook on Neural Information Processing (2013), 215-239.
- Nils Y Hammerla, Shane Halloran, and Thomas Plötz. 2016. Deep, convolutional, and recurrent models for human activity recognition using wearables. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.08880 (2016). · arXiv
- Harish Haresamudram, Apoorva Beedu, Varun Agrawal, Patrick L Grady, Irfan Essa, Judy Hoffman, and Thomas Plötz. 2020. Masked reconstruction based self-supervision for human activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 45-49.
- Harish Haresamudram, Irfan Essa, and Thomas Plötz. 2021. Contrastive predictive coding for human activity recogni- tion. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 5, 2 (2021), 1-26.
- Harish Haresamudram, Irfan Essa, and Thomas Plötz. 2022. Assessing the state of self-supervised human activity recognition using wearables. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 3 (2022), 1-47.
- Geoffrey Hinton, Oriol Vinyals, and Jeff Dean. 2015. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531 (2015). · arXiv
- Alexander Hoelzemann and Kristof Van Laerhoven. 2020. Digging deeper: towards a better understanding of transfer learning for human activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 50-54.
- Sergey Ioffe and Christian Szegedy. 2015. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In International conference on machine learning. pmlr, 448-456.
- Ashraful Islam, Chun-Fu Richard Chen, Rameswar Panda, Leonid Karlinsky, Rogerio Feris, and Richard J Radke. 2021. Dynamic distillation network for cross-domain few-shot recognition with unlabeled data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021), 3584-3595.
- Yash Jain, Chi Ian Tang, Chulhong Min, Fahim Kawsar, and Akhil Mathur. 2022. ColloSSL: Collaborative self-supervised learning for human activity recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 1 (2022), 1-28.
- Heli Koskimäki, Pekka Siirtola, and Juha Röning. 2017. Myogym: introducing an open gym data set for activity recognition collected using myo armband. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 537-546.
- Hyeokhyen Kwon, Catherine Tong, Harish Haresamudram, Yan Gao, Gregory D Abowd, Nicholas D Lane, and Thomas Ploetz. 2020. IMUTube: Automatic extraction of virtual on-body accelerometry from video for human activity recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 3 (2020), 1-29.
- Oscar D Lara and Miguel A Labrador. 2012. A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials 15, 3 (2012), 1192-1209.
- Mohammad Malekzadeh, Richard G Clegg, Andrea Cavallaro, and Hamed Haddadi. 2018. Protecting sensory data against sensitive inferences. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Privacy by Design in Distributed Systems. 1-6.
- Francisco Javier Ordóñez Morales and Daniel Roggen. 2016. Deep convolutional feature transfer across mobile activity recognition domains, sensor modalities and locations. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 92-99.
- Mehrab Bin Morshed, Koustuv Saha, Richard Li, Sidney K D'Mello, Munmun De Choudhury, Gregory D Abowd, and Thomas Plötz. 2019. Prediction of mood instability with passive sensing. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 3 (2019), 1-21.
- Vinod Nair and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2010. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10). 807-814.
- Aaron van den Oord, Yazhe Li, and Oriol Vinyals. 2018. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748 (2018). · arXiv
- Francisco Javier Ordóñez and Daniel Roggen. 2016. Deep convolutional and lstm recurrent neural networks for multimodal wearable activity recognition. Sensors 16, 1 (2016), 115.
- Yassine Ouali, Céline Hudelot, and Myriam Tami. 2020. An overview of deep semi-supervised learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.05278 (2020). · arXiv
- Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, et al. 2019. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in neural information processing systems 32 (2019).
- Cheng Perng Phoo and Bharath Hariharan. 2020. Self-training for few-shot transfer across extreme task differences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.07734 (2020). · arXiv
- Thomas PlÖtz. 2021. Applying machine learning for sensor data analysis in interactive systems: Common pitfalls of pragmatic use and ways to avoid them. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 54, 6 (2021), 1-25.
- David MW Powers. 2020. Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.16061 (2020). · arXiv
- Attila Reiss and Didier Stricker. 2012. Introducing a new benchmarked dataset for activity monitoring. In 2012 16th international symposium on wearable computers. IEEE, 108-109.
- Aaqib Saeed, Tanir Ozcelebi, and Johan Lukkien. 2019. Multi-task self-supervised learning for human activity detection. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 2 (2019), 1-30.
- Jake Snell, Kevin Swersky, and Richard Zemel. 2017. Prototypical networks for few-shot learning. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
- Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The journal of machine learning research 15, 1 (2014), 1929-1958.
- Allan Stisen, Henrik Blunck, Sourav Bhattacharya, Thor Siiger Prentow, Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard, Anind Dey, Tobias Sonne, and Mads Møller Jensen. 2015. Smart devices are different: Assessing and mitigatingmobile sensing hetero- geneities for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on embedded networked sensor systems. 127-140.
- Timo Sztyler and Heiner Stuckenschmidt. 2016. On-body localization of wearable devices: An investigation of position-aware activity recognition. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom). IEEE, 1-9.
- Chi Ian Tang, Ignacio Perez-Pozuelo, Dimitris Spathis, Soren Brage, Nick Wareham, and Cecilia Mascolo. 2021. Selfhar: Improving human activity recognition through self-training with unlabeled data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.06073 (2021). · arXiv
- Chi Ian Tang, Ignacio Perez-Pozuelo, Dimitris Spathis, and Cecilia Mascolo. 2020. Exploring contrastive learning in human activity recognition for healthcare. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.11542 (2020). · arXiv
- Terry T Um, Franz MJ Pfister, Daniel Pichler, Satoshi Endo, Muriel Lang, Sandra Hirche, Urban Fietzek, and Dana Kulić. 2017. Data augmentation of wearable sensor data for parkinson's disease monitoring using convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction. 216-220.
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
- Oriol Vinyals, Charles Blundell, Timothy Lillicrap, Daan Wierstra, et al. 2016. Matching networks for one shot learning. Advances in neural information processing systems 29 (2016).
- Yaqing Wang, Quanming Yao, James T Kwok, and Lionel M Ni. 2020. Generalizing from a few examples: A survey on few-shot learning. ACM computing surveys (csur) 53, 3 (2020), 1-34.
- Colin Wei, Kendrick Shen, Yining Chen, and Tengyu Ma. 2020. Theoretical analysis of self-training with deep networks on unlabeled data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03622 (2020). · arXiv
- Qizhe Xie, Minh-Thang Luong, Eduard Hovy, and Quoc V Le. 2020. Self-training with noisy student improves imagenet classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 10687-10698.
- Qiantong Xu, Alexei Baevski, Tatiana Likhomanenko, Paden Tomasello, Alexis Conneau, Ronan Collobert, Gabriel Synnaeve, and Michael Auli. 2021. Self-training and pre-training are complementary for speech recognition. In ICASSP 2021-2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 3030-3034.
- I Zeki Yalniz, Hervé Jégou, Kan Chen, Manohar Paluri, and Dhruv Mahajan. 2019. Billion-scale semi-supervised learning for image classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.00546 (2019). · arXiv
- Piero Zappi, Daniel Roggen, Elisabetta Farella, Gerhard Tröster, and Luca Benini. 2012. Network-level power- performance trade-off in wearable activity recognition: A dynamic sensor selection approach. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (TECS) 11, 3 (2012), 1-30.
- Mi Zhang and Alexander A Sawchuk. 2012. USC-HAD: A daily activity dataset for ubiquitous activity recognition using wearable sensors. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on ubiquitous computing. 1036-1043.
- Barret Zoph, Ekin D Cubuk, Golnaz Ghiasi, Tsung-Yi Lin, Jonathon Shlens, and Quoc V Le. 2020. Learning data augmentation strategies for object detection. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23-28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXVII 16. Springer, 566-583.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Haresamudram, H., Tang, C. I., Suh, S., Lukowicz, P., & Plötz, T. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3729467 · Cited by 33
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thukral, M., Haresamudram, H., & Ploetz, T.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-35
- ISSN
- 2157-6904 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2310.14390
- OpenAlex
- W4404572660
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 6.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
- Keywords
- human activity recognition, cross-domain transfer learning, few-shot learning, inertial measurement unit, sensor-based activity recognition, limited labeled data, domain gap
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review