PreprintCited by 1Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesSpeech and dialogue systems

Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Tasks

Open access
Sun, Jiao, Tian, Yufei, Zhou, Wangchunshu, Xu, Nan, Hu, Qian, Gupta, Rahul, Wieting, John Frederick, Peng, Nanyun +1 more·2023·arXiv

Abstract

While recent studies have looked into the abilities of large language models in various benchmark tasks, including question generation, reading comprehension, multilingual and etc, there have been few studies looking into the controllability of large language models on generation tasks. We present an extensive analysis of various benchmarks including a sentence planning benchmark with different granularities. After comparing large language models against state-of-the-start finetuned smaller models, we present a spectrum showing large language models falling behind, are comparable, or exceed the ability of smaller models. We conclude that **large language models struggle at meeting fine-grained hard constraints**.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2310.14542

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 1

Authors
Sun, J., Tian, Y., Zhou, W., Xu, N., Hu, Q., Gupta, R., Wieting, J. F., Peng, N., & Ma, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Amazon (United States) (US)
  • Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387929264
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
large language models, controllable generation, sentence planning, constraint satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review