HANSEN: Human and AI Spoken Text Benchmark for Authorship Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Authorship Analysis, also known as stylometry, has been an essential aspect of Natural Language Processing (NLP) for a long time. Likewise, the recent advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has made authorship analysis increasingly crucial for distinguishing between human-written and AI-generated texts. However, these authorship analysis tasks have primarily been focused on written texts, not considering spoken texts. Thus, we introduce the largest benchmark for spoken texts - HANSEN (Human ANd ai Spoken tExt beNchmark). HANSEN encompasses meticulous curation of existing speech datasets accompanied by transcripts, alongside the creation of novel AI-generated spoken text datasets. Together, it comprises 17 human datasets, and AI-generated spoken texts created using 3 prominent LLMs: ChatGPT, PaLM2, and Vicuna13B. To evaluate and demonstrate the utility of HANSEN, we perform Authorship Attribution (AA) & Author Verification (AV) on human-spoken datasets and conducted Human vs. AI spoken text detection using state-of-the-art (SOTA) models. While SOTA methods, such as, character ngram or Transformer-based model, exhibit similar AA & AV performance in human-spoken datasets compared to written ones, there is much room for improvement in AI-generated spoken text detection. The HANSEN benchmark is available at: https://huggingface.co/datasets/HANSEN-REPO/HANSEN.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some approaches consider multiple human classes, e.g., a 10-class classification with seven human classes and three LLM classes.
“For instance, a 10-class classification might include seven human classes and three LLM classes [Tripto et al., 2023].”
From Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Tripto et al., 2023
The AI-generated spoken texts in HANSEN were created by ChatGPT, PaLM2, and Vicuna-13B.
“The AI-generated spoken texts in HANSEN were created by ChatGPT, PaLM2, and Vicuna-13B.”
From A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as Tripto et al. 2023
HANSEN is the largest benchmark for spoken text, encompassing the organization of 17 speech datasets and records, as well as 23k novel AI-generated spoken texts.
“The Human and AI Spoken Text Benchmark (HANSEN) (Tripto et al. 2023) is the largest benchmark for spoken text, encompassing the organization of 17 speech datasets and records, as well as 23k novel AI-generated spoken texts.”
From A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as Tripto et al. 2023
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 6
- Authors
- Tripto, N. I., Uchendu, A., Le, T., Setzu, M., Giannotti, F., & Lee, D.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- University of Mississippi (US)
- Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" (IT)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 13706-13724
- arXiv
- 2310.16746
- OpenAlex
- W4389518717
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1820609, 1934782, 2114824, 2131144)
- European Commission (654024, IR0000013, HORIZON2020, PE00000013, 101079043, 871042, Spoke 1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- authorship analysis, stylometry, spoken text, AI-generated text detection, authorship attribution, author verification, large language models, speech dataset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review