PreprintCited by 3Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

Predicting Question-Answering Performance of Large Language Models through Semantic Consistency

Open access
Rabinovich, Ella, Ackerman, Samuel, Raz, Orna, Farchi, Eitan, Anaby-Tavor, Ateret·2023·arXiv

Abstract

Semantic consistency of a language model is broadly defined as the model's ability to produce semantically-equivalent outputs, given semantically-equivalent inputs. We address the task of assessing question-answering (QA) semantic consistency of contemporary large language models (LLMs) by manually creating a benchmark dataset with high-quality paraphrases for factual questions, and release the dataset to the community. We further combine the semantic consistency metric with additional measurements suggested in prior work as correlating with LLM QA accuracy, for building and evaluating a framework for factual QA reference-less performance prediction -- predicting the likelihood of a language model to accurately answer a question. Evaluating the framework on five contemporary LLMs, we demonstrate encouraging, significantly outperforming baselines, results.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2311.01152

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PopQA-TP is a benchmark composed of high-quality paraphrases for factual questions, where each question has multiple semantically-equivalent variations.

    “PopQA-TP (Rabinovich et al., 2023), a benchmark composed of high-quality paraphrases for factual questions, where each question has multiple semantically-equivalent variations.”

    From From Imitation to Introspection: Probing Self-Consciousness in Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Rabinovich et al., 2023

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rabinovich, E., Ackerman, S., Raz, O., Farchi, E., & Anaby-Tavor, A.
Affiliations
IBM (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388327322
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
semantic consistency, large language models, question answering, factual question answering, paraphrase, benchmark dataset, performance prediction, semantic equivalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review