PreprintCited by 174Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.

Inner-IoU: More Effective Intersection over Union Loss with Auxiliary Bounding Box

Open access

Abstract

With the rapid development of detectors, Bounding Box Regression (BBR) loss function has constantly updated and optimized. However, the existing IoU-based BBR still focus on accelerating convergence by adding new loss terms, ignoring the limitations of IoU loss term itself. Although theoretically IoU loss can effectively describe the state of bounding box regression,in practical applications, it cannot adjust itself according to different detectors and detection tasks, and does not have strong generalization. Based on the above, we first analyzed the BBR model and concluded that distinguishing different regression samples and using different scales of auxiliary bounding boxes to calculate losses can effectively accelerate the bounding box regression process. For high IoU samples, using smaller auxiliary bounding boxes to calculate losses can accelerate convergence, while larger auxiliary bounding boxes are suitable for low IoU samples. Then, we propose Inner-IoU loss, which calculates IoU loss through auxiliary bounding boxes. For different datasets and detectors, we introduce a scaling factor ratio to control the scale size of the auxiliary bounding boxes for calculating losses. Finally, integrate Inner-IoU into the existing IoU-based loss functions for simulation and comparative experiments. The experiment result demonstrate a further enhancement in detection performance with the utilization of the method proposed in this paper, verifying the effectiveness and generalization ability of Inner-IoU loss. Code is available at https://github.com/malagoutou/Inner-IoU.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2311.02877

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 174

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Jiahui Yu, Yuning Jiang, Zhangyang Wang, Zhimin Cao, and Thomas Huang, "Unitbox: An advanced object detection network," in Proceed- ings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2016, pp. 516-520.
  2. Hamid Rezatofighi, Nathan Tsoi, JunYoung Gwak, Amir Sadeghian, Ian Reid, and Silvio Savarese, "Generalized Intersection Over Union: A Metric and a Loss for Bounding Box Regression," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019, pp. 658-666.
  3. Zhaohui Zheng, Ping Wang, Wei Liu, Jinze Li, Rongguang Ye, Dongwei Ren, "Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regression," in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020, vol. 34, no. 07, pp. 12993-13000.
  4. Yi-Fan Zhang, Weiqiang Ren, Zhang Zhang, Zhen Jia, Liang Wang, and Tieniu Tan, "Focal and Efficient IOU Loss for Accurate Bounding Box Regression," Neurocomputing, vol. 506, pp. 146-157, 2022.
  5. Zhora Gevorgyan, "SIoU Loss: More Powerful Learning for Bounding Box Regression," arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.12740, 2022. · arXiv
  6. J. Jiabo He, Sarah Erfani, Xingjun Ma, James Bailey, Ying Chi, Xian- Sheng Hua, "alpha-IoU: A Family of Power Intersection Over Union Losses for Bounding Box Regression," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 20230-20242, 2021.
  7. Zanjia Tong, Yuhang Chen, Zewei Xu, Rong Yu, "Wise-IoU: Bound- ing Box Regression Loss with Dynamic Focusing Mechanism," arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10051, 2023. · arXiv
  8. Chang Xu, Jinwang Wang, Wen Yang, Lei Yu, "Dot Distance for Tiny Object Detection in Aerial Images," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021, pp. 1192-1201.
  9. Gong Cheng, Xiang Yuan, Xiwen Yao, Kebing Yan, Qinghua Zeng, Xingxing Xie, Junwei Han, "Towards Large-Scale Small Object Detec- tion: Survey and Benchmarks," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 45, pp. 13467-13488, 2023.
  10. Joseph Redmon, Santosh Divvala, Ross Girshick, and Ali Farhadi, "You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection," in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016, pp. 779-788.
  11. Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi, "YOLOv3: An Incremental Improve- ment," arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767, 2018. · arXiv
  12. Alexey Bochkovskiy, Chien-Yao Wang, and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao, "Yolov4: Optimal speed and accuracy of object detection," arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10934, 2020. · arXiv
  13. Chien-Yao Wang, Alexey Bochkovskiy, and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao, "YOLOv7: Trainable Bag-of-Freebies Sets New State-of-the-Art for Real-Time Object Detectors," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 7464-7475.
  14. Ross Girshick, "Fast r-cnn,", Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2015, pp. 1440-1448.
  15. Wei Liu, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Christian Szegedy, Scott Reed, Cheng-Yang Fu and Alexander C. Berg , "SSD: Single Shot Multibox Detector," in Computer Vision-ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, Pro- ceedings, Part I, Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 21-37.
  16. Tsung-Yi Lin, Priya Goyal, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He and Piotr Dollár, "Focal loss for dense object detection," in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2017, pp. 2980-2988.
  17. H. Law and J. Deng, "Cornernet: Detecting objects as paired keypoints," in Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), 2018, pp. 734-750.
  18. Kaiwen Duan, Song Bai, Lingxi Xie, Honggang Qi, Qingming Huang, Qi Tian, "CenterNet: Keypoint triplets for object detection," in Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2019, pp. 6569-6578.
  19. Zhi Tian, Chunhua Shen, Hao Chen, Tong He, "FCOS: Fully Convo- lutional One-Stage Object Detection," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2019, pp. 9627-9636.
  20. M Everingham, L Van Gool, CKI Williams, J Winn, A Zisserman, "The PASCAL Visual Object Classes (VOC) Challenge," International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 88, pp. 303-338, 2010.
  21. Jinwang Wang, Wen Yang, Haowen Guo, Ruixiang Zhang, Gui-Song Xia, "Tiny object detection in aerial images," in 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), IEEE, 2021, pp. 3791-3798.

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, H., Xu, C., & Zhang, S.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388513214
Cited by
174
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
bounding box regression, intersection over union loss, object detection, loss function design, convergence acceleration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inner-IoU: More Effective Intersection over Union Loss with Auxiliary Bounding Box. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2311.02877
The paper
Zhang, H., Xu, C., & Zhang, S. (2023). Inner-IoU: More Effective Intersection over Union Loss with Auxiliary Bounding Box. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2311.02877