The DOI matches its DataCite record; 288 of the 300 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 151 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV-based IoT Networks
Open accessAbstract
Internet of Things (IoT) involves sensors for monitoring and wireless networks for efficient communication. However, resource-constrained IoT devices and limitations in existing wireless technologies hinder its full potential. Integrating Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) into IoT networks can address some challenges by expanding its' coverage, providing security, and bringing computing closer to IoT devices. Nevertheless, effective data collection in UAV-assisted IoT networks is hampered by factors, including dynamic UAV behavior, environmental variables, connectivity instability, and security considerations. In this survey, we first explore UAV-based IoT networks, focusing on communication and networking aspects. Next, we cover various UAV-based data collection methods their advantages and disadvantages, followed by a discussion on performance metrics for data collection. As this article primarily emphasizes reliable and efficient data collection in UAV-assisted IoT networks, we briefly discuss existing research on data accuracy and consistency, network connectivity, and data security and privacy to provide insights into reliable data collection. Additionally, we discuss efficient data collection strategies in UAV-based IoT networks, covering trajectory and path planning, collision avoidance, sensor network clustering, data aggregation, UAV swarm formations, and artificial intelligence for optimization. We also present two use cases of UAVs as a service for enhancing data collection reliability and efficiency. Finally, we discuss future challenges in data collection for UAV-assisted IoT networks.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This survey reviews reliable and efficient data collection in UAV-assisted IoT networks, organizing existing work around reliability (data accuracy/consistency, connectivity, security/privacy) and efficiency (trajectory planning, clustering, aggregation, swarm formations, AI optimization). It also discusses communication technologies, performance metrics, two UAV-as-a-service use cases, and future challenges such as interoperability and interference.
Key findings
- The survey categorizes reliable data collection into three main areas: data accuracy and consistency, network connectivity, and data security and privacy; efficient data collection is categorized into trajectory and path planning, sensor network clustering, data aggregation, UAV swarm formations, and AI optimization techniques.
- It compares wireless communication technologies for UAV-IoT networks, reporting examples such as BLE proximity detection within 30 meters extendable to 100 meters, Wi-Fi throughput from 54 Mbps for 802.11a to as high as 2.4 Gbps for 802.11ax, and 6G anticipated to offer rates 100 times faster than 5G.
- It cites simulation results for Directional Hierarchical AODV (DH-AODV): reduced end-to-end delay by 47%, improved throughput by 11.2%, and decreased packet loss rate by 20% compared with standard AODV.
- It presents two use cases—UAV as a Mobile Edge Computing server and UAV as a Wireless Power Transfer source—and identifies interoperability and interference in massive UAV-IoT networks as future challenges.
Methods
- Design: A survey article that reviews and categorizes existing research on UAV-assisted IoT data collection, focusing on reliability and efficiency.
- Data/sample: No primary dataset or experimental sample; the paper synthesizes prior literature, protocols, schemes, and use cases, with comparison tables for communication technologies, data collection modes, routing protocols, trajectory/path planning, cluster-head selection, and UAV swarm formations.
- Analysis: Qualitative categorization and comparison of existing schemes, performance metrics, and open challenges; no new experiments or quantitative meta-analysis are reported.
Limitations
- The paper does not state explicit limitations of its own survey.
- Evident from the text: it is a secondary review without new experiments, simulations, or primary data collection, so its findings depend on the cited literature.
- Evident from the text: many comparisons are qualitative or table-based, and the survey notes future challenges such as interoperability and interference rather than providing a systematic validation of all reviewed schemes.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
137 Sources not found · 91 No basis given · 46 Own interpretation · 3 Not checked yet
In the paper
“Dynamic trajectory control techniques for UAVs are becoming increasingly important to ensure a long connection lifespan while sufficiently covering the target region of interest [16].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Motivation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“due to the usage of resource-constrained devices (aka nodes) in terms of processing capacity, storage, and energy in IoT networks and the limited communication range and data speed of the existing wireless technologies, IoT is not fully used in every immersive application domain and scenarios [3].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > I. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“UAVs rely on rechargeable batteries, severely limiting mission duration due to limited battery capacity [12].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Motivation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [12]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The choice of data collection mode can be dynamically adjusted according to the energy consumption of the UAV.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Hybrid UAV Data Collection
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, if the volume of data is large, the UAV in this mode may struggle to meet the data-collecting timeliness requirement.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Flying UAV Data Collection
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to research in UAV-assisted data collection, the best UAV speed is directly proportional to sensor energy and density but inversely proportional to data volume for upload.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Flying UAV Data Collection
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“However, the peculiar issues faced by UAV networks necessitate the development of new routing algorithms to ensure reliable communication among UAVs [80] and between UAVs and the control centre(s).”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“These schemes are particularly effective in emergency or underwater environments where efficient data gathering is crucial.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > D. Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Method
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [59]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [68]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Advanced Tail-Biting Turbo-Hadamard Codes are a proposed solution for ensuring reliable communication in UAV networks, particularly considering short data packets in UAVs [72].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Data Accuracy and Consistency
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [72]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The RCRA programme implements a three-tiered strategy to improve the overall performance and efficacy of these complex systems [74].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Data Accuracy and Consistency
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [74]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- It may state two separate claims as one. 118
- Probably not a substantial claim. 180
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“these issues can be resolved with the integration of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) into the communication network as it can not only extend the coverage but also bring the computing resources near to the IoT devices [6], [7].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > I. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reliable and Efficient Data Collection (DC) in IoT is critical because it improves operational efficiency by automating sensor data collecting, provides accurate real-time insights, improves the productivity, scalability and resiliency of the underlying systems.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Motivation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Due to prevalent Non-Line-of-Sight (NLoS) conditions between UAVs and IoT devices, the heterogeneous character of these networks creates complex channel modelling, making Air-to-Ground (A2G) channels prone to blocking [14].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Motivation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Using UAV data collectors, on the other hand, proved to be a more efficient strategy, allowing for faster and more reliable data collection [8].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > I. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In addition, IoT devices, which are similarly constrained by energy and not possible to replace their batteries frequently, rely on periodic data transmission to UAVs and erratic movement, which exacerbates the difficulty [13].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Motivation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, employing a network of interconnected UAV platforms is imperative to ensure seamless connectivity.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Integration of UAVs and IoT
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“These gateways connect to the network server via regular IP connections and operate as a transparent bridge, transforming RF packets to IP packets and vice versa [50].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 6) Sixth Generation (6G):
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Ultimately, BLE's superior advantage lies in its lower power consumption and cost-effectiveness compared to Wi-Fi [37].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Integration of UAVs and IoT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similar to the support 5G provides, we anticipate that 6G networks will better fulfil the varied requirements of UAV networks, encompassing low latency, reliability, and energy efficiency, making aerial nodes an essential component of 6G networks.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 6) Sixth Generation (6G):
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In brief, hovering mode provides reliable data transfer at a greater energy cost.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Hovering-based UAV Data Collection
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The 6TiSCH (IPv6 over Time Slotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) mode of IEEE 802.15.4e) wireless protocol stack is released to offer high-throughput, low and bounded latency, energy efficient, and reliable communication in mission-critical IoT applications.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Integration of UAVs and IoT
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In both methods, the UAV can switch between static and mobile data collection modes based on the requirements of the data collection task.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Hybrid UAV Data Collection
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“As the UAV-assisted terrestrial network idea improves the DC process, it remains vulnerable to potential data interception during transmission to UAVs due to the broadcast nature of wireless channels [17].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Motivation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“This mode is more energyefficient than the static mode but less so than the mobile mode.”
- Also stated in: § D. Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Method · plain
“Schemes such as [59] and [68] are more energy-efficient than the static mode but less so than the mobile mode.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Hybrid UAV Data Collection
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [59]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [68]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § D. Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Method · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Drones can operate as 5G radio stations in certain scenarios, extending the coverage of 5G networks for ground users, particularly for important applications such as public safety and disaster management [46], [23].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 5) Fifth Generation (5G):
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [46]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“LTE technology improves airborne connectivity for drones by extending communication beyond Line of Sight (LoS), increasing throughput, and strengthening network connectivity through robust hard and soft hand-over procedures [43].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Integration of UAVs and IoT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [43]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Positioned as the upcoming wireless communication generation, 6G is anticipated to offer intelligent, secure, dependable, and boundless connectivity at rates 100 times faster than 5G [47].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 6) Sixth Generation (6G):
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [47]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“On the other hand, mobile data collection schemes like [65] and [66] are beneficial in scenarios where the IoT devices are widely dispersed or when the area to be covered is large.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > D. Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Method
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [65]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [66]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“It is crucial to remember, however, that LoRaWAN may not be ideal for real-time or control-heavy applications [51].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 6) Sixth Generation (6G):
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [51]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reliable and efficient data collection is necessary to improve the scalability, reliability, and resiliency in UAV-assisted IoT environments.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Contribution and Organization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This security flaw jeopardizes data security and confidentiality, emphasizing the need for robust security protocols to provide protection against potential threats such as man-in-the-middle attacks and unauthorized data alterations [18].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Motivation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [18]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) is a specialized cellular network technology that has been fine-tuned to meet the rising demands of the IoT landscape.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 6) Sixth Generation (6G):
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Static data collection schemes, such as [62] and [63], are ideal for scenarios where minimizing the AoI is crucial or where maximizing the minimum UAV data collection throughput from Ground Nodes (GNs) is important, subject to the energy budgets at both the UAV and GNs.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > D. Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Method
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [62]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [63]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The primary communication technology utilized in the communications of many commercial UAVs is Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11 series), especially when connecting to a ground station for tasks like command and control commands in the uplink and video streaming in the downlink [41].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Integration of UAVs and IoT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“LoRaWAN: It is a wireless communication protocol designed for IoT applications.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 6) Sixth Generation (6G):
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The 5G network is being investigated for drone communications, particularly when larger bit rates are necessary [45].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 5) Fifth Generation (5G):
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [45]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Additionally, Wi-Fi-based UAV networks have the capability to serve as wireless backhauling systems [42].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Integration of UAVs and IoT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [42]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Additionally, technologies like Long Range Wide Area Network (LoRaWAN) enable long-range, low-power communications, especially suitable when high throughput is not the primary concern [34], [35].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Integration of UAVs and IoT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [35]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“These schemes are particularly effective in smart city environments where secure data collection is a priority.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > D. Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Method
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [65]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [66]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ability to capture data while moving ensures that the data collection operation is completed quickly.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Flying UAV Data Collection
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In many scenarios, the operational area of an IoT network can be extended far beyond the Line of Sight (LoS) communication range by using UAVs.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Integration of UAVs and IoT
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This facilitates efficient routing by applying a shortest path algorithm to select the optimal next hop towards various destinations, ensuring effective communication within the network [81].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [81]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“This method guarantees the uninterrupted and secure operation of UAV communication and control systems, especially when network conditions change.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > Re-Transmission:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ) protocol, which includes acknowledgement (ACK) and timing strategies, is frequently used in these re-transmission procedures.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > Re-Transmission:
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In such a complicated environment, bandwidth requirements for different data types, such as voice, data, or video, are distinct, reflecting the multiple needs of UAV networks.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“[77] offers a comprehensive strategy for maximising throughput in terrestrial networks augmented by UAVs.The primary objective is to minimise delays and packet losses by optimising UAV trajectories and reinforcing congested nodes and transmission channels.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > Re-Transmission:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [77]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the search for improved protocols continuing in these environments, multi-UAV networks present a unique set of requirements to consider, including managing mobility patterns, nodes' localization, link control, nodes' additions and removals, diverse application areas, and specific QoS needs due to power constraints.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“To address this challenge, a layered UAV swarm network architecture has been proposed [76].This architecture integrates a low latency routing algorithm (LLRA), designed based on partial location information and network connectivity.By this approach, the packet delivery ratio is enhanced, and the link average delay is reduced, ensuring efficient re-transmissions and maintaining data consistency.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > Re-Transmission:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [76]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The nodes are subject to intermittent failures or power limits, necessitating rapid replacements to provide an uninterrupted and dependable connection.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The disadvantage of having a relay is the data transmission delay induced by the UAV's movement.This delay results in an increase in total energy consumption, which further degrades bit error rate performance, particularly at high SNR levels [73].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Data Accuracy and Consistency
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [73]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Balanced performance strategy seeks to simultaneously decrease UAV network energy consumption, transmission delays, and bit error rate [73].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Data Accuracy and Consistency
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [73]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“[78] underscores the importance of secure downlink data transmission through NOMA and optimising UAV trajectories and resources.While not explicitly addressing re-transmission, the paper indirectly enhances data transfer reliability by minimizing errors.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > Re-Transmission:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [78]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In terms of network connectivity, UAV networks exhibit a wide range of dynamics, ranging from slow-moving to extremely fast operations.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Forward Error Correction (FEC) codes stand out as a technique capable of detecting and rectifying bit errors without necessitating data re-transmission.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Data Accuracy and Consistency
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These are suitable for scenarios where network topology changes are relatively slow and predictable.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A UAV is equipped with a wireless bidirectional relay to increase transmission throughput and extend network coverage.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Data Accuracy and Consistency
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, GBN allows the emitter to continue transmitting packets without an individual packet ACK up to a window size limit.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > Re-Transmission:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This scheme significantly reduces the Block-Error-Ratio (BLER) and the BER, enhancing the robustness and dependability of decentralised UAV networks [74].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Data Accuracy and Consistency
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [74]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The key advantage of proactive routing is that it contains the most up-to-date route information.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These networks incorporate the core elements of typical mobile wireless networks while adding complexity.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These lines must also struggle with high bit error rates due to interference or natural obstructions.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the pursuit of enhanced communication protocols for aerial networks, researchers have extensively studied the protocols used in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks (MANETs) and Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks (VANETs) due to the apparent similarities with UAV networks.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“In SW protocol, the originator cannot transmit additional packets without an ACK [6], [75].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > Re-Transmission:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [75]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Using this approach, data packets are forwarded while circumventing high-risk areas, minimizing the risk of potential attacks on user data.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > Re-Transmission:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [76]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, maintaining reliable connectivity in UAV networks is frequently hampered by disturbances in links caused by the location of UAVs and base stations.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In certain scenarios, data packets might require re-transmission due to errors or losses during transmission, impacting data timeliness and freshness.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > Re-Transmission:
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“[6] presents an innovative strategy for establishing a secure heterogeneous network environment with the assistance of UAVs using an IP prototype that is seamless.It emphasises the significance of re-establishing communication tunnels between UAVs and end devices (EDs) during their traversal of heterogeneous networks to maintain uninterrupted communication.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > Re-Transmission:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Although this approach is not explicitly focused on re-transmission, it indirectly contributes to data reliability by enabling seamless connectivity even when network conditions change.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > Re-Transmission:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When bit errors are detected in received packets, a re-transmission process is initiated to guarantee reliable data transmission in UAV networks.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > Re-Transmission:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Conversely, [79] focuses on security measures to mitigate eavesdropping and enhance privacy protection in aerial-ground transmission.Although not directly addressing re-transmission, it indirectly contributes to error reduction, reducing the reliance on re-transmission for maintaining data transfer reliability.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > Re-Transmission:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [79]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“While this paper does not explicitly discuss re-transmission techniques, its primary goal of minimising packet loss contributes inherently to reducing the need for re-transmissions.In turn, this improves the dependability of data transmission in UAV networks.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > Re-Transmission:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [77]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Bit errors during data transmission in UAVassisted IoT networks can detrimentally impact data accuracy, often stemming from interference, signal fading, and noise.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Data Accuracy and Consistency
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, building new routes in UAV networks using DSR can be time-consuming because each packet must transmit the addresses of all nodes from source to destination, making it less suitable for large or dynamically changing networks [88].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [88]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Spray and Wait has been modified and optimized in numerous ways to enhance its performance.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Opportunistic Routing Protocols (ORP) take advantage of multiple forwarding opportunities to increase the chances of data delivery, which can be useful in challenging network conditions.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This protocol uses a cluster-based multi-hop routing approach to reduce the high communication overhead due to the scalability of IoT networks.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [98]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“From the standpoint of data communication, this protocol constructs a data forwarding priority model and sets data transmission rules in conjunction with a node activity range division method [93].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [93]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the route discovery process might introduce high latency since finding routes can be time-consuming.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The large latency of the initial route discovery stage in reactive routing protocols can be decreased by employing HRP, as can the overhead of control messages in proactive routing systems.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These modifications make Spray and Wait a versatile and resilient protocol for opportunistic routing in various network conditions.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within each zone, ZRP employs proactive routing, maintaining up-to-date routing information for the zone.This proactive strategy helps to minimize the initial route discovery delay typically associated with reactive routing.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It dynamically adjusts to changing link conditions, providing advantages such as low processing and memory overhead, as well as low network utilization.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Source-Tree Adaptive Routing (STAR) reduces overhead by conditioning update dissemination, albeit with increased memory and processing requirements in large and mobile networks [82].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [82]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They are suitable for scenarios with dynamic and unpredictable network topology changes.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It enables networks to self-organize and self-configure without relying on current infrastructure.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Energy-Efficient AODV (EE-AODV) routing protocol is a variation of the AODV routing protocol that has been built primarily to improve energy efficiency in UAV networks [100].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [100]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is especially well-suited for large networks, and the network is divided into zones, with Interzone routing performed in advance and Interzone routing handled reactively.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another variant, Space-Aware Spray and Transfer Routing (SSTR) takes into account both the temporal and spatial information of mobile nodes.This helps nodes to select more competent nodes for further forwarding of packet copies [95].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [95]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“These variants demonstrate the flexibility and adaptability of OLSR, catering to diverse network scenarios and ensuring efficient communication within ad-hoc networks [83].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [83]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“To optimize routing in this context, OLSR implements Multipoint Relays (MPRs), designating specific nodes to forward control traffic.This strategic selection significantly reduces the transmission load and minimizes control message overhead, enhancing the efficiency and streamlining the routing process in UAV networks, which are often resource-constrained and rapidly changing [81].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [81]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While this approach eliminates the need for periodic beaconing and ensures connectivity, it does not scale well as route failure probability and header size increase with network size, resulting in higher overhead.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reactive protocols, due to their ondemand nature, are bandwidth-efficient as they avoid periodic messaging.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“RGR leverages UAV loca-tion data and reactive end-to-end paths, showcasing enhanced efficiency, particularly in search missions, with superior performance in delay and packet delivery ratio compared to existing protocols like AODV [86].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [86]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“However, the traditional approach of using the right-hand rule to identify the next hop node in perimeter forwarding can lead to detours.This can increase overhead in UAV networks with rapidly changing topologies [90].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [90]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“However, this strategy requires each intermediate node to store and maintain routing information for active routes, and nodes need to be aware of neighbouring nodes through beaconing messages, presenting a potential overhead in the UAV network [84].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [84]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Global State Routing (GSR) optimizes by restricting update messages to intermediate nodes, aiming for improved efficiency.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“EE-AODV also provides algorithms for balancing energy usage among nodes and avoiding the overuse of certain nodes.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [100]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, challenges may emerge if the message gets trapped in a local minimum during this process, causing a halt in progress.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“However, it does face delays during route construction and potential bandwidth consumption issues during route discovery, especially with growing network size and in the presence of link or node failures in UAV networks [85].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [85]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Opportunistic routing techniques can assure reliable and efficient communication even in highly dynamic networks by taking advantage of every feasible opportunity for data forwarding.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These protocols are very relevant in UAV-based IoT systems because network topology might change quickly due to UAV mobility.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Its “route discovery” and “route maintenance” technologies allow nodes to identify and maintain routes to numerous destinations, allowing for multiple route selection and applications such as load balancing.It also ensures loop-free routing [87].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [87]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR) is a positionbased routing mechanism frequently employed in UAV Adhoc networks.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AODV optimizes routing traffic by building routes on demand.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This covers many applications, including transportation, traffic control, surveillance, border patrolling, search and rescue, disaster management, wireless network connectivity, smart agriculture and forestry, and remote immersion via mobile virtual reality [97].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [97]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“BP uses a “store and forward” mechanism, which means that data is stored at a node until it can be forwarded to the next node.This is particularly useful when network connectivity is sporadic or unreliable [96].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [96]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“For example, the Sharing Spray and Wait routing algorithm determines the next node and the number of copies a node can deliver based on the duration of message carriage and the probability of message delivery [94].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [94]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The Bundle Protocol provides a unified interface for applications while allowing the underlying network to handle disruptions and long delays.This is particularly useful when network connectivity is sporadic or unreliable [96].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [96]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Another variant, the Distance Routing Effect Algorithm for Mobility (DREAM), leverages GPS-derived geographical coordinates to optimize routing efficiency, allowing for proportional updates based on node velocity and reducing overall overhead.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, autonomous scheduling has the advantage of zero control packet overhead in the network and so can save nodes' energy.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This ensures coordinated and efficient operations by UAVs in the network, essential for mission success and safety in complex airspace environments [112].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [112]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In IoT-IoT networks, where numerous IoT devices need to communicate, TDMA brings structure and predictability to the communication process.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to frequent channel sensing and re-transmissions, random access protocols may consume more energy.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Software-Defined Networking (SDN) for UAVs applied to UAV networks to provide dynamic and centralized control over routing and network management.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [103]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A low latency routing algorithm (LLRA) is designed based on partial location information and the connectivity of the network architecture [101].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [101]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Collisions can reduce network efficacy and increase latency, making effective contention resolution mechanisms crucial.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, IoT devices can synchronize their activities with the assigned time slots, which helps conserve power by minimizing the need for constant channel sensing, making it well-suited for low-power IoT devices with sporadic data transmission requirements [110].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [110]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It can manage various UAVs in the network without requiring a fixed schedule, making it adaptable to changing mission specifications.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, implementing SDN in UAV networks also presents several challenges, such as security, adaptability, interference management, interoperability, and lack of standardization.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Despite these challenges, the combination of SDN and UAV-enabled networks is becoming essential in the 6G networking context and can offer more flexibility, scalability, reliability, and efficient connectivity than conventional approaches [105].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [105]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hierarchical AODV (HAODV) is a variant of the AODV routing protocol.It's designed to improve the scalability of Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs).”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In UAV-UAV networks, TDMA helps coordinate communication between multiple UAVs working together on missions such as search, rescue or surveillance.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In UAV-IoT networks, TDMA plays a critical role in coordinating communication between UAVs and the ground-based IoT devices they interact with.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“[113] proposes a dynamic time-division multiple access (DTDMA) scheme based on time mirroring to reduce relaying latency in airborne relay communication and to permit multiple nodes to access the network effectively.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [113]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“To accommodate a military communication environment in which nodes join and leave frequently, the proposed scheme also conducts efficient resource allocation and supports seamless voice communication.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [113]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Configuring and administering time slots for a large number of devices can be difficult and may necessitate centralization.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Collectively, these characteristics allow this TDMA scheme to provide greater throughput with very low control latency for both static and mobile network topologies.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [114]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TDMA may not be the ideal option for applications with irregular or modest data transfer needs.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, standards such as IEEE 802.15.4e or RFCs do not provide information about managing/scheduling (i.e., allocation and deallocation) such data transmitting cells.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“This mechanism not only reduces the control overhead associated with reserving time slots but also increases the network's efficiency by assuring maximum time slot utilisation.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [114]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This time slot assignment reduces the likelihood of data collisions, ensuring efficient and organized communication.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In addition, it improves spatial reuse, which is the practice of using the same frequencies for communications in various spatial areas, reusing the limited frequency spectrum.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [114]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“SDN separates the control and data planes, providing complete network programmability [104].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [104]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conversely, fewer assigned cells would severely degrade the network performance.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Scheduling of transmission cells is very challenging in dynamic IoT networks because assigning a larger number of cells would increase the energy consumption of the nodes by forcing them to activate their radios in the assigned slots.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random access MAC, when combined with CSMA/CA and back-off mechanisms, can optimise channel utilisation and reduce contention.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Directional Hierarchical AODV (DH-AODV) routing protocol takes advantage of the existing fields of the control packets in the AODV to reduce the load on the network's bandwidth and quickly detect route breakage.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“UAVs can be obstructed from one another in a three-dimensional airspace [108].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [108]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“They not only affect the system performance but also the energy efficiency in battery-powered sensor nodes [106].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [106]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Additionally, TDMA is scalable and can accommodate a large number of devices or UAVs through the addition of additional time segments [115].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [115]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“[114] integrates an additional reservation period into a real-time, distributed, bidirectional TDMA scheme.This feature enables a node to reserve a future time slot while transmitting data in the present time slot.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [114]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random access MAC enables UAVs to transmit data on demand, making it suitable for dynamic and unforeseeable mission scenarios.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TDMA requires precise synchronisation among devices or UAVs for its efficacy.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For instance, in a two-tier HRP, the lower tier might implement a proactive routing strategy while the upper tier employs a reactive routing strategy.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [101]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Beamforming is a vital technology in wireless communications that optimizes signal direction to improve both security and efficiency [129].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [129]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In a given scenario where a UAV serves as a relay to facilitate data transmission to receivers with distinct security clearance levels within a maximum cruising duration T, the receiver with lower security clearance poses a potential eavesdropping threat, potentially intercepting signals intended for the receiver with higher security clearance.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“NOMA is recognized as a highly promising technique for achieving superior spectral efficiency by multiplexing information signals at varying power levels [129].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [129]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, when UDP is chosen as the transport layer protocol, the RFC 6347 datagram transport layer security (DTLS) can provide security at the transport layer.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“IoT networks such as IPv6 over Low-power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPAN) take advantage of the strong AES-128 link layer security defined in IEEE 802.15.4 standard.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Furthermore, transmitting artificial noise to disrupt eavesdroppers and efficient power allocation for this purpose are discussed in [128], acknowledging the computational challenges of finding optimal power allocations in UAV-based systems.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [128]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Another critical aspect is that data flowing in a typical IoT system is not just”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In [133], an algorithm fine-tunes UAV transmit power, location, and IRS phase shift to optimize secrecy rates in UAV-to-Ground User transmissions, outperforming baseline approaches.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [133]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Additionally, OST and A3 allocate slots based on traffic estimation, which is not immediate.Consequently, it contributes to an increase in packet delivery latency.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [121]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [122]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“However, both Orchestra and ALICE suffer from static and limited allocation of transmission (Tx) and reception (Rx) slots.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [119]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [120]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“whereas MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport) uses TLS for encryption and supports username/password authentication and access control lists (ACLs) to enhance the security of IoT data transmissions.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“[126] investigate the possibility of trajectory design to bolster physical layer security in UAV systems and introduce the concept of joint resource allocation and trajectory design.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [126]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The IRS is a revolutionary technology composed of specialized meta-surfaces designed to redirect incoming signals towards desired destinations, enhancing communication efficiency.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Lin et al. [138] developed a method that involves sampling-rooted path determination based on the swiftly exploring random tree algorithm.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Trajectory Planning
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [138]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to the resourceconstrained IoT devices, the outside attackers get more options to attack the IoT networks.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: IoT devices are resource-constrained.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Traditional path-planning methods often rely on known mathematical models of the environment, but this approach can be limiting, especially when operating in unknown or unpredictable environments.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Trajectory Planning
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TI's CC2538 wireless MCU, which integrates a powerful ARM Cortex-M3 CPU and an IEEE 802.15.4 radio.The device has up to 512kB Flash and 32kB RAM and a hardware encryption engine capable of supporting TLS/DTLS.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Basically, the link layer security provides link authentication and encryption to resource-constrained IoT devices.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the pursuit of efficient navigation through intricate surroundings, Wang et al. [137] explored deep reinforcement learning (DRL).”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Trajectory Planning
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [137]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Additionally, a robust joint design strategy in [127] is explored for scenarios with partial or statistical eavesdropper position information.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [127]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Traditional encryption methods require high computational complexity, which consumes a lot of energy.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Lastly, [136] introduces an iterative algorithm maximizing secrecy rates for BS-to-User communications, strategically controlling IRS phase shifts and UAV position, and utilizing the UAV as a passive relay for improved PLS.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [136]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is crucial to acknowledge that this allocation doesn't just impact the signal strength for the intended recipient but also unwanted eavesdroppers.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The application layer protocols like CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol) can be secured with DTLS to encrypt and authenticate communication, providing security to IoT networks”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Path planning in UAV flight is a critical task that involves determining the most efficient route from the UAV's starting point to its intended destination.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Trajectory Planning
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“[135] considers UAV and ground user communication with IRS against a single Eve, optimizing UAV trajectory, IRS beamforming, and users' transmit power, highlighting IRS's positive impact on PLS and secrecy rates.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [135]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In [134], the focus is on maximizing network secure energy efficiency (EE), achieving this by optimizing user association, power control, trajectory, and phase shift, illustrating enhanced secure EE.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [134]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it should be noted that implementing TLS/DTLS requires the device to have the necessary resources, such as a hardware encryption engine to enable the use of advanced cypher suites, etc.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This algorithm effectively creates trajectories that avoid collisions with obstacles in real-time, considering factors such as the number of obstacles, their approach angles, and speeds.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Trajectory Planning
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [138]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, the IRS offers the dual benefit of energy-efficient communication and a potential line of defence against security threats, ultimately extending UAV battery life.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Pham et al. [139] introduced a novel approach employing reinforcement learning, a machine learning technique, to navigate UAVs effectively in uncertain and variable conditions.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Trajectory Planning
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [139]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“On the other hand, OST and A3 provide adaptive slot allocation i.e., depending on networks' slot requirement, they suffer from high energy consumption when there is less traffic in the network.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [121]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [122]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“However, increasing Rx slots of the root node only help the immediate neighbour nodes and significant performance improvement of the other nodes i.e. two or more hop distance nodes cannot be expected.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > SDN for UAVs SDN-based
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [123]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As an alternative, physical layer security makes use of the wireless channels' intrinsic uncertainty to secure wireless communication networks in a way that is computationally efficient and effective.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Security and Privacy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Incorporating machine learning into path planning, Yijing et al. [140] proposed a strategy that synergistically combined Q learning and neural networks to enhance the UAV's learning rate during path planning and obstacle avoidance.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Trajectory Planning
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [140]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Systems like Sense and Avoid (SAA) or Detect and Avoid (DAA) play a pivotal role, enabling UAVs to seamlessly integrate into civil airspace and conduct operations Beyond Visual”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Trajectory Planning
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Energy-efficient UAV swarm formation algorithms focus on reducing energy consumption to prolong the cluster's lifetime and improve data collection efficiency.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 1) Considering Localisation:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These characteristics make them well-suited for situations with less mobility, ensuring reliable and efficient data transfer, making them perfect for jobs like reconnaissance and surveillance.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 1) Considering Localisation:
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Certain criteria, such as the node's energy level or communication capability, or a combination of these aspects, influence this choice [150].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Sensor Network Clustering
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [150]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They prioritize factors like node connectivity and link duration, delivering good PDR and End-To-End Delay (ETED) performance, suitable for time-sensitive scenarios like rescue missions.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 1) Considering Localisation:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This technique involved training a UAV to reach its target using a PID+Q-learning algorithm, sidestepping the need for a precise mathematical model of the environment.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Trajectory Planning
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [139]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The small number of clusters is determined by a larger cluster, which shortens flight times and narrows the UAV's path.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Sensor Network Clustering
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It rapidly clusters the whole network, which is particularly beneficial in dynamic applications where network topology changes often.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Sensor Network Clustering
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“RNNs, especially with variants like Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) networks, are highly adaptable in UAV systems, given their exceptional capacity for handling sequential data.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > E. AI Optimisation Techniques
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effective CH selection and management lower communication overhead, improve network performance, and allow for direct communication within the effective range.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > D. UAV Swarm Formations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: FANETs face significant challenges like fast mobility, frequent topology changes, unreliable connectivity, and limited energy.
In the paper
“The introduction of the Adaptive and Random Exploration (ARE) approach reduced learning errors, enabling more accurate computation of the route by allowing the UAV to adapt its actions based on real-time evaluations and redirect to a safe path when close to obstacles.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Trajectory Planning
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [140]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to advancements in computer power, AI algorithms, and sensor technologies, the field of UAV collision avoidance is expanding quickly.These developments significantly improve UAV autonomy and safety, creating possibilities for wider deployment across different applications.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Trajectory Planning
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many clusters will raise the energy required for UAV flight but will minimize the energy needed for the cluster to forward data.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Sensor Network Clustering
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It enables UAVs to learn by trial and error, adapting to their environments to maximize rewards.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > E. AI Optimisation Techniques
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [186]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In UAV systems, GRU networks are employed for heading error modelling to enhance the accuracy of forecasting direction and improve defect detection.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > E. AI Optimisation Techniques
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“One of the notable strengths of RNNs is their ability to process temporal dependencies and manage sequential data effectively [200], [201].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > E. AI Optimisation Techniques
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [200]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [201]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unlike classic neural networks, where all inputs and outputs are independent of one another, RNNs can manage sequences of inputs using their internal state stated as memory.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > E. AI Optimisation Techniques
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Selection is based on random choices, which do not guarantee an optimal solution and can result in an uneven distribution of SNs within each cluster, leading to imbalance.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Sensor Network Clustering
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [155]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“As a result, these are especially beneficial for applications like time series prediction, natural language processing, and speech recognition [199].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > E. AI Optimisation Techniques
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [199]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The core idea of RL is to continuously improve decision-making over time by seeking to maximize cumulative rewards through learning and adaptation [186].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > E. AI Optimisation Techniques
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [186]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These issues impact operational reliability and efficiency.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > D. UAV Swarm Formations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: FANETs face significant challenges like fast mobility, frequent topology changes, unreliable connectivity, and limited energy.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clustering aids in the control of node heterogeneity, as well as the improvement of fault tolerance and scalability.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > D. UAV Swarm Formations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: FANETs face significant challenges like fast mobility, frequent topology changes, unreliable connectivity, and limited energy.
In the paper
“Shiri et al. [141] tackled the challenge of managing large UAVs, focusing on efficient movement and energy conservation, particularly in adverse conditions like windy weather.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Trajectory Planning
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [141]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The strategic selection of CHs within a WSN cluster can maximize the communication range and extend the network's lifespan.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Sensor Network Clustering
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clustering UAVs for hierarchical management is an effective strategy for addressing these problems and improving performance.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > D. UAV Swarm Formations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: FANETs face significant challenges like fast mobility, frequent topology changes, unreliable connectivity, and limited energy.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mobility-considered algorithms are adapted to dynamic network conditions, optimizing routing and communication while minimizing delays and ensuring reliable data delivery.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 1) Considering Localisation:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“By utilizing neural networks to model the UAV's continuous state space, the UAV could navigate and effectively escape challenging situations, thereby enhancing the efficiency and safety of the path computation process.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Trajectory Planning
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [140]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Data aggregation in a UAV-assisted network begins when sensors start delivering data towards the aggregation sites i.e., CH, and concludes when the UAV reaches the last aggregation point on its route, here UAVs serves as ariel base station [166].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Aggregation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [166]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Although the LEACH algorithm prolongs the network's lifespan compared to multi-hop and direct transmission, it has several limitations.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Sensor Network Clustering
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [153]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“For instance, these networks have been utilized to predict heading errors caused by body axis tilt during flight, further ensuring the precision and reliability of UAV operations [204].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > E. AI Optimisation Techniques
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [204]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These clustered routing methods optimize network energy usage, throughput, and latency while extending cluster lifetimes by considering energy and node degree.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 1) Considering Localisation:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the rapidly evolving field of UAV systems, the integration of AI techniques has spurred numerous advancements, enabling UAVs to perform a wide array of tasks with increased efficiency and accuracy.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > E. AI Optimisation Techniques
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, a few clusters will result in a reduction in the amount of energy used by UAVs during flight but an increase in the energy used by sensors.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Sensor Network Clustering
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These clustering-based routing methods highlight the effectiveness of data collection and the dependability of communication by taking UAV energy levels into account and encouraging extended CH survival.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 1) Considering Localisation:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“LSTM networks, when combined with GANs, address resource allocation challenges in UAV networks, particularly in scenarios involving multiple UAVs.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > E. AI Optimisation Techniques
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Consequently, when an SN with lower energy is chosen as a CH, its energy depletes more rapidly, reducing the network's overall lifetime [155].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Sensor Network Clustering
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [155]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ensuring collision-free operations is a fundamental element of safe and efficient UAV flights.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Trajectory Planning
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Data aggregation can help improve network energy efficiency, enhance the lifespan of wireless sensor networks, and minimise network traffic by minimising the quantity of data that needs to be transmitted [165].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Aggregation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [165]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In the context of UAVs, LSTM networks have been employed in a multitude of applications, including resource allocation in Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communications [202].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > E. AI Optimisation Techniques
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [202]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“They employed a machine learning-assisted mean-field game approach, a mathematical framework that effectively guided UAVs to avoid mid-air collisions while minimizing communication and computational energy.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Trajectory Planning
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [141]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CNNs serve as the fundamental of image analysis in UAV applications.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > E. AI Optimisation Techniques
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“RL empowers UAVs to make optimal decisions in dynamic, realtime environments, benefiting tasks such as path planning, autonomous flight control, and resource allocation.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 5) Comparison and Application:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Multi-UAV-assisted MEC systems offer unique advantages, including dynamic trajectory planning based on GDs' real-time locations and tasks, contributing to energy savings and reduced latency.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. UAV as Mobile Edge Computing Server
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In IoT networks assisted by UAVs, interoperability is a complex and multifaceted challenge that has a significant influence on the efficiency of communication between IoT devices and UAVs.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Interoperability
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This escalation in interference is a direct consequence of the high density of UAVs operating in close proximity.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Interference in massive UAV-IoT Networks
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Furthermore, UAVs' variable heights increase the probability of establishing LoS links with GDs, strengthening and expanding UAV coverage [212].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. UAV as Mobile Edge Computing Server
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [212]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They significantly improve the accuracy of damage detection and reduce the reliance on manual feature engineering.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > E. AI Optimisation Techniques
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AI can enable UAVs to adapt dynamically to changing interference patterns, optimize their communication strategies, and reduce the overall impact of interference on network performance.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Interference in massive UAV-IoT Networks
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“To tackle this, MEC has emerged as an advanced solution, shifting mobile computing to network edge nodes (e.g., base stations, access points), allowing compute-intensive applications on GDs with constrained resources [207].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. UAV as Mobile Edge Computing Server
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [207]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The progress in UAV-enabled wireless communications has sparked interest in UAV-enabled WPT as a promising solution to address the technical challenges in WPT.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. UAV as Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) Source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CNNs excel at image analysis, enhancing object recognition, damage detection, and anomaly identification, thus reducing the need for manual feature engineering.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 5) Comparison and Application:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These AI techniques contribute to the increasing autonomy and capability of UAVs, allowing them to perform a wide array of tasks with efficiency and precision in dynamic and complex environments.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 5) Comparison and Application:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It extracts crucial features from images, enabling UAVs to identify objects, classify images, and detect anomalies [205].”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > E. AI Optimisation Techniques
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [205]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The choice among these techniques depends on the specific UAV application's requirements, whether it involves data generation, sequential data processing, image analysis, or dynamic decision-making.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 5) Comparison and Application:
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“GANs primarily focus on data augmentation, image synthesis, addressing data imbalances, enhancing object recognition, surveillance, and image generation.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 5) Comparison and Application:
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“WPT is being integrated into wireless communication and computation networks [207], [220], enabling a variety of unique applications.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. UAV as Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) Source
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [207]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [220]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“RNNs handle temporal dependencies, resource allocation, anomaly detection, and predictive tasks, enabling better trajectory prediction and real-time decisionmaking.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 5) Comparison and Application:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
A clear roadmap for achieving reliable and efficient data collection in UAV-assisted IoT networks remains elusive.
“However, a clear roadmap for achieving reliable and efficient data collection in UAV-assisted IoT networks remains elusive.”
The paper relies on this without support.
UAVs have limited battery capacity.
“which is crucial for UAVs with limited battery capacity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
IoT devices are resource-constrained.
“Due to the resourceconstrained IoT devices”
The paper relies on this without support.
The full deterministic position of the eavesdropper is not known in the real world.
“which is not the case in real world.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Network topology in UAV networks is subject to rapid changes or is highly diverse.
“They are especially useful in scenarios where the network topology is subject to rapid changes or is highly diverse.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Using multiple UAVs working together is more effective for challenging tasks compared to a single UAV.
“Using multiple UAVs or drones, working together is more effective for challenging tasks compared to a single UAV.”
The paper relies on this without support.
FANETs face significant challenges like fast mobility, frequent topology changes, unreliable connectivity, and limited energy.
“This collaborative approach, known as Flying Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs), faces significant challenges like fast mobility, frequent topology changes, unreliable connectivity, and limited energy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
RL is fundamental to autonomous decision-making in UAV systems.
“RL is a dynamic approach fundamental to autonomous decision-making in UAV systems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The framework of the sensor network becomes complex, and the cost of routing between sensors increases as the number of sensors increases.
“The framework of the sensor network becomes complex, and the cost of routing between sensors increases as the number of sensors increases.”
The paper relies on this without support.
K-means is a common clustering method in UAV networks due to its effectiveness and simplicity.
“K-means is a common clustering method in UAV networks due to its effectiveness and simplicity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
GAN is currently popular in the field of UAVs.
“GAN is currently popular in the field of UAVs.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Interoperability
“IoT devices frequently employ low-power, short-range technologies such as 6TiSCH or LoRaWAN for their energy efficiency and suitability for local data transmission.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > A. Integration of UAVs and IoT
“Additionally, technologies like Long Range Wide Area Network (LoRaWAN) enable long-range, low-power communications”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > 1) Considering Localisation:
“Arafat et al. (2020) [180]”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > References
“180. C. Zang and S. Zang, "Mobility prediction clustering algorithm for UAV networking," in Proc. GLOBECOM Workshops, 2011, pp. 1158- 1161.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Aggregation
“[174], on the other hand, introduces a cooperative strategy involving unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) and UAVs for data collection from sensor nodes.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > References
“174. M. Nie, P. Huang, J. Zeng, Y. Lu, T. Zhang, and T. Lv, "A Novel Dynamic Transmission Power of Cluster Heads Based Clustering Scheme," Electronics, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 619, 2023.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
“the network is divided into zones, with Interzone routing performed in advance and Interzone routing handled reactively.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > B. Network Connectivity
“For communication between zones, ZRP switches to a reactive routing strategy.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > C. Data Aggregation
“The construction of a fully immersive industrial metaverse is explored in [173], with a focus on the optimization of key performance indicators such as reliability, latency, and the Age of Information using creative packet architectures in 6G URLLC communication.”
§ Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV based IoT Networks > References
“173. Z. Li, W. Zhao, and C. Liu, "Completion Time Minimization for UAV- UGV-Enabled Data Collection," Sensors, vol. 22, no. 15, p. 5839, 2022.”
Citations
Cites
The Internet of Things: A survey
Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · Cited by 15,613
Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks
Heinzelman, W., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2000.926982 · Cited by 14,946 · cited 1×
“Restrictions apply. of AI to achieve smooth integration and enhance network performance.”
Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks
Radford, A., Metz, L., & Chintala, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.06434 · Cited by 12,235 · cited 1×
“Through concerted efforts in these areas, researchers and industry stakeholders can overcome current limitations and pave the way for widespread BVLOS deployment of UAVs across various applications.”
Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks
Graves, A., Mohamed, A.-R., & Hinton, G. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638947 · Cited by 8,893 · cited 1×
“Through concerted efforts in these areas, researchers and industry stakeholders can overcome current limitations and pave the way for widespread BVLOS deployment of UAVs across various applications.”
Edge computing: Vision and challenges
Shi, W., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., & Xu, L. (2016) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2016.2579198 · Cited by 8,733 · cited 1×
“However, recent trends are shifting toward decentralized, on-the-fly processing using embedded GPUs, TPUs, and methods like MEC and fog computing, which enable near real-time data processing [37], [38].”
A Survey on Mobile Edge Computing: The Communication Perspective
Mao, Y., You, C., Zhang, J., Huang, K., & Letaief, K. B. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2745201 · Cited by 5,607 · cited 1×
“This allows compute-intensive applications to run effectively on GDs with constrained resources [89].”
Internet of Things in industries: A survey
Xu, L. D., He, W., & Li, S. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2300753 · Cited by 5,172
A Vision of 6G Wireless Systems: Applications, Trends, Technologies, and Open Research Problems
Saad, W., Bennis, M., & Chen, M. (2020) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.001.1900287 · Cited by 4,985 · cited 1×
“Restrictions apply. collecting sensing data from surrounding sensors and UAVs and aggregating the data for further processing.”
Mobile Edge Computing: A Survey on Architecture and Computation Offloading
Mach, P., & Becvar, Z. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2682318 · Cited by 3,258 · cited 1×
“In this survey paper, we discussed the various aspects of UAV-assisted IoT systems, focusing on their classification, roles, and essential technologies for reliable and efficient data collection.”
RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks
Brandt, A., Hui, J., Kelsey, R. A., Levis, P. A., Pister, K. S. J., Struik, R., Vasseur, J., & Alexander, R. (2012) · doi:10.17487/rfc6550 · Cited by 2,662
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- J. de Carvalho Silva, J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, A. M. Alberti, P. Solic, and A. L. L. Aquino, "LoRaWAN -A low power WAN protocol for Internet of Things: A review and opportunities," in 2017 2nd International Multidisciplinary Conference on Computer and Energy Science (SpliTech), 2017, pp. 1-6.
- --, "An AUV-assisted data gathering scheme based on clustering and matrix completion for smart ocean," IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 9904-9918, 2020.
- M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, Y.-H. Nam, and M. Debbah, "A tutorial on UAVs for wireless networks: Applications, challenges, and open problems," IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 2334-2360, 2019.
- D. Pan, M. Lin, and L. Chen, "Space-Aware Spray and Transfer Routing Protocol for Opportunistic Networks," Chinese Journal of Electronics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 363-368, 2013.
- Q. Zhang, M. Jiang, Z. Feng, W. Li, W. Zhang, and M. Pan, "IoT enabled UAV: Network architecture and routing algorithm," IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 3727-3742, 2019.
- I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, "Generative adversarial nets," Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 27, 2014.
- J. Heaton, "Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville: Deep learning: The MIT Press, 2016, 800 pp, ISBN: 0262035618," Genetic programming and evolvable machines, vol. 19, no. 1-2, pp. 305-307, 2018.
- F. Zhou, R. Q. Hu, Z. Li, and Y. Wang, "Mobile edge computing in unmanned aerial vehicle networks," IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 140-146, 2020.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Meeting the Requirements of Internet of Things: The Promise of Edge Computing
Hazra, A., Kalita, A., & Gurusamy, M. (2023) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3339492 · Cited by 62
Self-citationTowards sustainable industry 4.0: A survey on greening IoE in 6G networks
Alsamhi, S. H., Hawbani, A., Sahal, R., Srivastava, S., Kumar, S., Zhao, L., Al‐qaness, M. A. A., Hassan, J. A., Guizani, M., & Curry, E. (2024) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2024.103610 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Joshi, P., Kalita, A., & Gurusamy, M.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore
- Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad (IN)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 28
- Pages
- 2531-2571
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2311.05303
- OpenAlex
- W4408305012
- Semantic Scholar
- 1b2dc08237da180aec2f4e3aeec08565155905b0
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 300
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 19.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › UAV Applications and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT Networks and Protocols
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Keywords
- data collection, trajectory planning, data aggregation, data security and privacy, network connectivity, federated learning, decentralized reinforcement learning, generative AI, blockchain, network topology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
