Camels in a Changing Climate: Enhancing LM Adaptation with Tulu 2
Open accessAbstract
Since the release of TÜLU [Wang et al., 2023b], open resources for instruction tuning have developed quickly, from better base models to new finetuning techniques. We test and incorporate a number of these advances into TÜLU, resulting in TÜLU 2, a suite of improved TÜLU models for advancing the understanding and best practices of adapting pretrained language models to downstream tasks and user preferences. Concretely, we release: (1) TÜLU-V2-mix, an improved collection of high-quality instruction datasets; (2) TÜLU 2, LLAMA-2 models finetuned on the V2 mixture; (3) TÜLU 2+DPO, TÜLU 2 models trained with direct preference optimization (DPO), including the largest DPO-trained model to date (TÜLU 2+DPO 70B); (4) CODE TÜLU 2, CODE LLAMA models finetuned on our V2 mix that outperform CODE LLAMA and its instruction-tuned variant, CODE LLAMA-Instruct. Our evaluation from multiple perspectives shows that the TÜLU 2 suite achieves state-of-the-art performance among open models and matches or exceeds the performance of GPT-3.5-turbo-0301 on several benchmarks. We release all the checkpoints, data, training and evaluation code to facilitate future open efforts on adapting large language models.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GPT-4 used as an annotator to represent human preference prefers longer sentences over shorter ones.
“Specifically, when using a GPT-4 to represent human preference, it will prefer to choose a long sentence rather than a short sentence (Dubois et al., 2024a;Ivison et al., 2023;Gu et al., 2024;Hu et al., 2024b;Koo et al., 2023;Wang et al., 2023a;Wu and Aji, 2023;Dubois et al., 2024b;Chen et al., 2023;Hu et al., 2024c).”
From Explaining Length Bias in LLM-Based Preference Evaluations (2025) · cites this paper as Ivison et al., 2023
The Evaluation Suite section says the paper uses GPT-4 to compare model responses in AlpacaEval. Table 4 and the ‘DPO training increases model verbosity’ section report longer DPO-model outputs alongside higher AlpacaEval win rates, but they do not establish that GPT-4 prefers a longer response over a shorter one because of its length. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBoth Llama-3 and Tulu-2 utilized some variant of DPO.
“Interestingly, both Llama-3 and Tulu-2 [69] utilized some variant of DPO [149] citing significantly lower computational cost while maintaining similar performance.”
From RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs (2026) · cites this paper as [69]
DPO tends to make model responses longer.
“Previous work (Gu et al., 2024;Ivison et al., 2023) has shown that DPO (Rafailov et al., 2023) tends to make model responses longer”
From Explaining Length Bias in LLM-Based Preference Evaluations (2025) · cites this paper as Ivison et al., 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- R. Anil, A. M. Dai, O. Firat, M. Johnson, D. Lepikhin, A. Passos, S. Shakeri, E. Taropa, P. Bailey, Z. Chen, et al. Palm 2 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10403, 2023. · arXiv
- Y. Bai, A. Jones, K. Ndousse, A. Askell, A. Chen, N. DasSarma, D. Drain, S. Fort, D. Ganguli, T. Henighan, et al. Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.05862, 2022. · arXiv
- I. Cachola, K. Lo, A. Cohan, and D. Weld. TLDR: Extreme summarization of scientific documents. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pages 4766-4777, On- line, Nov. 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp. 428. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020.findings-emnlp.428. · DOI · Paper page
- M. Chen, J. Tworek, H. Jun, Q. Yuan, H. P. d. O. Pinto, J. Kaplan, H. Edwards, Y. Burda, N. Joseph, G. Brockman, et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374, 2021. · arXiv
- H. W. Chung, L. Hou, S. Longpre, B. Zoph, Y. Tay, W. Fedus, E. Li, X. Wang, M. Dehghani, S. Brahma, et al. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11416, 2022. · arXiv
- G. Cui, L. Yuan, N. Ding, G. Yao, W. Zhu, Y. Ni, G. Xie, Z. Liu, and M. Sun. Ultrafeedback: Boosting language models with high-quality feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01377, 2023. · arXiv
- P. Dasigi, K. Lo, I. Beltagy, A. Cohan, N. A. Smith, and M. Gardner. A dataset of information-seeking questions and answers anchored in research papers. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Tech- nologies, pages 4599-4610, Online, June 2021. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10. 18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.365. URL https://aclanthology.org/2021.naacl-main.365. Databricks. Free dolly: Introducing the world's first truly open instruction-tuned llm. Blog post, 2023. URL https://www.databricks.com/blog/2023/04/12/ dolly-first-open-commercially-viable-instruction-tuned-llm. · DOI · Paper page
- T. Dettmers, A. Pagnoni, A. Holtzman, and L. Zettlemoyer. Qlora: Efficient finetuning of quantized llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14314, 2023. · arXiv
- Y. Dubois, X. Li, R. Taori, T. Zhang, I. Gulrajani, J. Ba, C. Guestrin, P. Liang, and T. B. Hashimoto. Alpacafarm: A simulation framework for methods that learn from human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14387, 2023. · arXiv
- C. Gulcehre, T. L. Paine, S. Srinivasan, K. Konyushkova, L. Weerts, A. Sharma, A. Siddhant, A. Ahern, M. Wang, C. Gu, et al. Reinforced self-training (rest) for language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08998, 2023. · arXiv
- T. Hartvigsen, S. Gabriel, H. Palangi, M. Sap, D. Ray, and E. Kamar. TOXIGEN: Controlling Language Models to Generate Implied and Adversarial Toxicity. In ACL, 2022. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2203.09509.
- A. Q. Jiang, A. Sablayrolles, A. Mensch, C. Bamford, D. S. Chaplot, D. d. l. Casas, F. Bressand, G. Lengyel, G. Lample, L. Saulnier, et al. Mistral 7b. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06825, 2023. · arXiv
- A. Köpf, Y. Kilcher, D. von Rütte, S. Anagnostidis, Z.-R. Tam, K. Stevens, A. Barhoum, N. M. Duc, O. Stanley, R. Nagyfi, et al. Openassistant conversations-democratizing large language model alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07327, 2023. · arXiv
- E. Lehman, J. DeYoung, R. Barzilay, and B. C. Wallace. Inferring which medical treatments work from reports of clinical trials. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 3705-3717, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/N19-1371. URL https://aclanthology.org/ N19-1371. · DOI
- B. Lester, R. Al-Rfou, and N. Constant. The power of scale for parameter-efficient prompt tun- ing. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Pro- cessing, pages 3045-3059, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, Nov. 2021. Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.243. URL https: //aclanthology.org/2021.emnlp-main.243. · DOI · Paper page
- S. Lin, J. Hilton, and O. Evans. Truthfulqa: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3214-3252, 2022.
- Y. Luan, L. He, M. Ostendorf, and H. Hajishirzi. Multi-task identification of entities, relations, and coreference for scientific knowledge graph construction. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 3219-3232, Brussels, Belgium, Oct.-Nov. 2018. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/D18-1360. URL https://aclanthology.org/D18-1360. · DOI
- L. Ouyang, J. Wu, X. Jiang, D. Almeida, C. L. Wainwright, P. Mishkin, C. Zhang, S. Agarwal, K. Slama, A. Ray, et al. Training Language Models to Follow Instructions with Human Feedback. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2022.
- B. Peng, C. Li, P. He, M. Galley, and J. Gao. Instruction tuning with gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03277, 2023. · arXiv
- R. Rafailov, A. Sharma, E. Mitchell, S. Ermon, C. D. Manning, and C. Finn. Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18290, 2023. · arXiv
- B. Roziere, J. Gehring, F. Gloeckle, S. Sootla, I. Gat, X. E. Tan, Y. Adi, J. Liu, T. Remez, J. Rapin, et al. Code llama: Open foundation models for code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12950, 2023. · arXiv
- P. Singhal, T. Goyal, J. Xu, and G. Durrett. A long way to go: Investigating length correlations in rlhf. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03716, 2023. · arXiv
- C. Snell, I. Kostrikov, Y. Su, M. Yang, and S. Levine. Offline rl for natural language generation with implicit language q learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.11871, 2022. · arXiv
- M. Suzgun, N. Scales, N. Schärli, S. Gehrmann, Y. Tay, H. W. Chung, A. Chowdhery, Q. V. Le, E. H. Chi, D. Zhou, et al. Challenging big-bench tasks and whether chain-of-thought can solve them. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.09261, 2022. · arXiv
- H. Touvron, T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet, M.-A. Lachaux, T. Lacroix, B. Rozière, N. Goyal, E. Hambro, F. Azhar, et al. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023a. · arXiv
- H. Touvron, L. Martin, K. Stone, P. Albert, A. Almahairi, Y. Babaei, N. Bashlykov, S. Batra, P. Bhargava, S. Bhosale, et al. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023b. · arXiv
- L. Tunstall, E. Beeching, N. Lambert, N. Rajani, K. Rasul, Y. Belkada, S. Huang, L. von Werra, C. Fourrier, N. Habib, et al. Zephyr: Direct distillation of lm alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16944, 2023. · arXiv
- D. Wadden, S. Lin, K. Lo, L. L. Wang, M. van Zuylen, A. Cohan, and H. Hajishirzi. Fact or fiction: Verifying scientific claims. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 7534-7550, Online, Nov. 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.609. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020.emnlp-main.609. · DOI · Paper page
- G. Wang, S. Cheng, X. Zhan, X. Li, S. Song, and Y. Liu. Openchat: Advancing open-source language models with mixed-quality data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11235, 2023a. · arXiv
- Y. Wang, H. Ivison, P. Dasigi, J. Hessel, T. Khot, K. R. Chandu, D. Wadden, K. MacMillan, N. A. Smith, I. Beltagy, et al. How far can camels go? exploring the state of instruction tuning on open resources. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.04751, 2023b. · arXiv
- J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, E. Chi, Q. Le, and D. Zhou. Chain of thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.11903, 2022. · arXiv
- C. Xu, Q. Sun, K. Zheng, X. Geng, P. Zhao, J. Feng, C. Tao, and D. Jiang. Wizardlm: Empowering large language models to follow complex instructions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12244, 2023. · arXiv
- L. Zheng, W.-L. Chiang, Y. Sheng, S. Zhuang, Z. Wu, Y. Zhuang, Z. Lin, Z. Li, D. Li, E. P. Xing, H. Zhang, J. E. Gonzalez, and I. Stoica. Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena. In NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks Track, 2023.
- C. Zhou, P. Liu, P. Xu, S. Iyer, J. Sun, Y. Mao, X. Ma, A. Efrat, P. Yu, L. Yu, et al. Lima: Less is more for alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11206, 2023. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism
DeepSeek-AI, :, Bi, X., Chen, D., Chen, G., Chen, S., Dai, D., Deng, C., Ding, H., Dong, K., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.02954 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
“As illustrated in (Ivison et al., 2023), and achieves 8.35 score comparable with GPT-3.”
ResultInfluentialSelf-citationGenerative language models exhibit social identity biases
Hu, T., Kyrychenko, Y., Rathje, S., Collier, N., van der Linden, S., & Roozenbeek, J. (2024) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-024-00741-1 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
Chaudhari, S., Aggarwal, P., Murahari, V., Rajpurohit, T., Kalyan, A., Narasimhan, K., Deshpande, A., & Castro da Silva, B. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3743127 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Synthesizing scientific literature with retrieval-augmented language models
Asai, A., He, J., Shao, R., Shi, W., Singh, A., Chang, J. C., Lo, K., Soldaini, L., Feldman, S., D’Arcy, M., et al. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-10072-4 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationRewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling
Lambert, N., Pyatkin, V., Morrison, J., Miranda, L., Lin, B. Y., Chandu, K., Dziri, N., Kumar, S., Zick, T., Choi, Y., et al. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2025 · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.96 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationOLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Models
Groeneveld, D., Beltagy, I., Walsh, P., Bhagia, A., Kinney, R., Tafjord, O., Jha, A. H., Ivison, H., Magnusson, I., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.00838 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“The evaluation suite (Wang et al., 2023; Ivison et al., 2023) for adapted models.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationExplaining Length Bias in LLM-Based Preference Evaluations
Hu, Z., Song, L., Zhang, J., Xiao, Z., Wang, T., Chen, Z., Yuan, N. J., Lian, J., Ding, K., & Xiong, H. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025 · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.358 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Following
Pyatkin, V., Malik, S., Graf, V., Ivison, H., Huang, S., Dasigi, P., Lambert, N., & Hajishirzi, H. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.02833 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationModel Swarms: Collaborative Search to Adapt LLM Experts via Swarm Intelligence
Feng, S., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Ebrahimi, S., Palangi, H., Miculicich, L., Kulshrestha, A., Rauschmayr, N., Choi, Y., Tsvetkov, Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.11163 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Implementation Details For a prototype of M ODEL S WARMS , we employ G EMMA -7B ( google/gemma-7b-it ) as the base model checkpoint, then fine-tune it on 10 different supervised fine-tuning domains to obtain 10 initial experts. we specifically employ Tulu-v2 (Ivison et al., 2023), an open collection of instruction-tun…”
InfluentialSelf-citationRewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluation
Malik, S., Pyatkin, V., Land, S., Morrison, J., Smith, N. A., Hajishirzi, H., & Lambert, N. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01937 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationHeterogeneous Swarms: Jointly Optimizing Model Roles and Weights for Multi-LLM Systems
Feng, S., Wang, Z., Goyal, P., Wang, Y., Shi, W., Xia, H., Palangi, H., Zettlemoyer, L., Tsvetkov, Y., Lee, C.-Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.04510
“We employ the pool of 10 LLM experts in Feng et al. [26] for fair comparison, fine-tuned from G EMMA -7B using 10 domains in Tulu-v2 [44] spanning reasoning, code, general instruction following, and more: We employ p = 0 .”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Ivison, H., Wang, Y., Pyatkin, V., Lambert, N., Peters, M., Dasigi, P., Jang, J., Wadden, D., Smith, N. A., Beltagy, I., & Hajishirzi, H.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2311.10702
- OpenAlex
- W4388890574
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- instruction tuning, large language model adaptation, direct preference optimization, DPO, instruction dataset, Llama 2, CodeLlama, open-source language models, user preference alignment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review