CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 10Machine Learning in Materials ScienceVarious Chemistry Research TopicsArtificial Intelligence Applications

Chemist-X: Large Language Model-empowered Agent for Reaction Condition Recommendation in Chemical Synthesis

Open access
Chen, Kexin, Lu, Jiamin, Li, Junyou, Yang, Xiaoran, Du, Yuyang, Wang, Kunyi, Shi, Qiannuan, Yu, Jiahui +7 more·2023·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2311.10776arXiv 2311.10776
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Recent AI research plots a promising future of automatic chemical reactions within the chemistry society. This study proposes Chemist-X, a comprehensive AI agent that automates the reaction condition optimization (RCO) task in chemical synthesis with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) technology and AI-controlled wet-lab experiment executions. To begin with, as an emulation on how chemical experts solve the RCO task, Chemist-X utilizes a novel RAG scheme to interrogate available molecular and literature databases to narrow the searching space for later processing. The agent then leverages a computer-aided design (CAD) tool we have developed through a large language model (LLM) supervised programming interface. With updated chemical knowledge obtained via RAG, as well as the ability in using CAD tools, our agent significantly outperforms conventional RCO AIs confined to the fixed knowledge within its training data. Finally, Chemist-X interacts with the physical world through an automated robotic system, which can validate the suggested chemical reaction condition without human interventions. The control of the robotic system was achieved with a novel algorithm we have developed for the equipment, which relies on LLMs for reliable script generation. Results of our automatic wet-lab experiments, achieved by fully LLM-supervised end-to-end operation with no human in the lope, prove Chemist-X's ability in self-driving laboratories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2311.10776

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In science, some existing works design LLM-based agents with a large amount of knowledge in memory to solve problems.

    “In the domain of science, some existing works design LLM-based agents with a large amount of knowledge in memory to solve problems [158, 160, 162].”

    From A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model-based Agents (2025) · cites this paper as [158]

    The Introduction (page not provided) describes Chemist-X as an LLM-based agent that retrieves information from a vast, updated knowledge source to recommend reaction conditions. But the paper places that knowledge in external databases, not in the agent’s memory; its discussion of short-term memory in §3.1 concerns examples supplied in prompts. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Baum, Z.J., Yu, X., Ayala, P.Y., Zhao, Y., Watkins, S.P., Zhou, Q.: Artificial intel- ligence in chemistry: current trends and future directions. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 61(7), 3197-3212 (2021)
  2. Chen, K., Chen, G., Li, J., Huang, Y., Wang, E., Hou, T., Heng, P.-A.: Metarf: attention-based random forest for reaction yield prediction with a few trails. Journal of Cheminformatics 15(1), 1-12 (2023)
  3. Boiko, D.A., MacKnight, R., Kline, B., Gomes, G.: Autonomous chemical research with large language models. Nature 624(7992), 570-578 (2023)
  4. Almeida, A.F., Moreira, R., Rodrigues, T.: Synthetic organic chemistry driven by artificial intelligence. Nature Reviews Chemistry 3(10), 589-604 (2019)
  5. Hofstätter, S., Chen, J., Raman, K., Zamani, H.: Fid-light: Efficient and effective retrieval-augmented text generation. In: Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 1437-1447 (2023)
  6. Siriwardhana, S., Weerasekera, R., Wen, E., Kaluarachchi, T., Rana, R., Nanayakkara, S.: Improving the domain adaptation of retrieval augmented gen- eration (rag) models for open domain question answering. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 11, 1-17 (2023)
  7. Cui, H., Du, Y., Yang, Q., Shao, Y., Liew, S.C.: Llmind: Orchestrating ai and iot with llms for complex task execution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.09007 (2023) · arXiv
  8. Guo, Z., Zhang, R., Zhu, X., Tang, Y., Ma, X., Han, J., Chen, K., Gao, P., Li, X., Li, H., et al.: Point-bind & point-llm: Aligning point cloud with multi- modality for 3d understanding, generation, and instruction following. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.00615 (2023) · arXiv
  9. Van Vliet, J., Paganelli, F.: Programming Amazon EC2: Survive Your Success. O'Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol (2011)
  10. Dong, Q., Li, L., Dai, D., Zheng, C., Wu, Z., Chang, B., Sun, X., Xu, J., Sui, Z.: A survey for in-context learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00234 (2022) · arXiv
  11. Nori, H., Lee, Y.T., Zhang, S., Carignan, D., Edgar, R., Fusi, N., King, N., Larson, J., Li, Y., Liu, W., et al.: Can generalist foundation models outcompete special- purpose tuning? case study in medicine. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16452 (2023) · arXiv
  12. Chen, J., Hu, H., Wu, H., Jiang, Y., Wang, C.: Learning the best pooling strategy for visual semantic embedding. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 15789-15798 (2021)
  13. Saebi, M., Nan, B., Herr, J.E., Wahlers, J., Guo, Z., Zurański, A.M., Kogej, T., Norrby, P.-O., Doyle, A.G., Chawla, N.V., et al.: On the use of real-world datasets for reaction yield prediction. Chemical Science 14(19), 4997-5005 (2023)
  14. Ahneman, D.T., Estrada, J.G., Lin, S., Dreher, S.D., Doyle, A.G.: Predict- ing reaction performance in c-n cross-coupling using machine learning. Science 360(6385), 186-190 (2018)
  15. Shields, B.J., Stevens, J., Li, J., Parasram, M., Damani, F., Alvarado, J.I.M., Janey, J.M., Adams, R.P., Doyle, A.G.: Bayesian reaction optimization as a tool for chemical synthesis. Nature 590(7844), 89-96 (2021)
  16. Zhang, B., Zhang, X., Du, W., Song, Z., Zhang, G., Zhang, G., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Jiang, J., Luo, Y.: Chemistry-informed molecular graph as reaction descrip- tor for machine-learned retrosynthesis planning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(41), 2212711119 (2022)
  17. Zhou, J., Cui, G., Hu, S., Zhang, Z., Yang, C., Liu, Z., Wang, L., Li, C., Sun, M.: Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications. AI open 1, 57-81 (2020)
  18. Khosla, P., Teterwak, P., Wang, C., Sarna, A., Tian, Y., Isola, P., Maschinot, A., Liu, C., Krishnan, D.: Supervised contrastive learning. Advances in neural information processing systems 33, 18661-18673 (2020)
  19. Steiner, S., Wolf, J., Glatzel, S., Andreou, A., Granda, J.M., Keenan, G., Hinkley, T., Aragon-Camarasa, G., Kitson, P.J., Angelone, D., et al.: Organic synthesis in a modular robotic system driven by a chemical programming language. Science 363(6423), 2211 (2019)
  20. Slattery, A., Wen, Z., Tenblad, P., Sanjosé-Orduna, J., Pintossi, D., Har- tog, T., Noël, T.: Automated self-optimization, intensification, and scale-up of photocatalysis in flow. Science 383(6681), 1817 (2024)
  21. Ley, S.V., Fitzpatrick, D.E., Ingham, R.J., Myers, R.M.: Organic synthesis: march of the machines. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 54(11), 3449-3464 (2015)
  22. Neelakantan, A., Xu, T., Puri, R., Radford, A., Han, J.M., Tworek, J., Yuan, Q., Tezak, N., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., et al.: Text and code embeddings by contrastive pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.10005 (2022) · arXiv
  23. Qian, G., Sural, S., Gu, Y., Pramanik, S.: Similarity between euclidean and cosine angle distance for nearest neighbor queries. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1232-1237 (2004)
  24. Perera, D., Tucker, J.W., Brahmbhatt, S., Helal, C.J., Chong, A., Farrell, W., Richardson, P., Sach, N.W.: A platform for automated nanomole-scale reac- tion screening and micromole-scale synthesis in flow. Science 359(6374), 429-434 (2018)
  25. Probst, D., Schwaller, P., Reymond, J.-L.: Reaction classification and yield pre- diction using the differential reaction fingerprint DRFP. Digital discovery 1(2), 91-97 (2022)
  26. Moriwaki, H., Tian, Y.-S., Kawashita, N., Takagi, T.: Mordred: a molecular descriptor calculator. Journal of cheminformatics 10(1), 1-14 (2018)
  27. Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q.-L., Tang, Y.: A brief overview of chatgpt: The history, status quo and potential future development. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 10(5), 1122-1136 (2023)
  28. Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Acm Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 785-794 (2016)
  29. Du, Y., Liew, S.C., Chen, K., Shao, Y.: The power of large language models for wireless communication system development: A case study on FPGA platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.07319 (2023) · arXiv
  30. Chen, K., Chen, G., Li, J., Huang, Y., Wang, E., Hou, T., Heng, P.-A.: MetaRF: attention-based random forest for reaction yield prediction with a few trails. Journal of Cheminformatics 15(1), 1-12 (2023)
  31. Yang, Z., Chakraborty, M., White, A.D.: Predicting chemical shifts with graph neural networks. Chemical science 12(32), 10802-10809 (2021)
  32. St. John, P.C., Guan, Y., Kim, Y., Kim, S., Paton, R.S.: Prediction of organic homolytic bond dissociation enthalpies at near chemical accuracy with sub-second computational cost. Nature communications 11(1), 2328 (2020)
  33. Khosla, P., Teterwak, P., Wang, C., Sarna, A., Tian, Y., Isola, P., Maschinot, A., Liu, C., Krishnan, D.: Supervised contrastive learning. Advances in neural information processing systems 33, 18661-18673 (2020)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, K., Lu, J., Li, J., Yang, X., Du, Y., Wang, K., Shi, Q., Yu, J., Li, L., Qiu, J., Pan, J., Huang, Y., Fang, Q., Heng, P. A., & Chen, G.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Zhejiang Lab (CN)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2311.10776
arXiv
2311.10776
OpenAlex
W4388890651
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Various Chemistry Research Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
reaction condition optimization, chemical synthesis, large language models, retrieval-augmented generation, AI agents, computer-aided design, self-driving laboratories

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review