The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.
AV-Deepfake1M: A Large-Scale LLM-Driven Audio-Visual Deepfake Dataset
Open accessAbstract
The detection and localization of highly realistic deepfake audio-visual content are challenging even for the most advanced state-of-the-art methods. While most of the research efforts in this domain are focused on detecting high-quality deepfake images and videos, only a few works address the problem of the localization of small segments of audio-visual manipulations embedded in real videos. In this research, we emulate the process of such content generation and propose the AV-Deepfake1M dataset. The dataset contains content-driven (i) video manipulations, (ii) audio manipulations, and (iii) audio-visual manipulations for more than 2K subjects resulting in a total of more than 1M videos. The paper provides a thorough description of the proposed data generation pipeline accompanied by a rigorous analysis of the quality of the generated data. The comprehensive benchmark of the proposed dataset utilizing state-of-the-art deepfake detection and localization methods indicates a significant drop in performance compared to previous datasets. The proposed dataset will play a vital role in building the next-generation deepfake localization methods. The dataset and associated code are available at https://github.com/ControlNet/AV-Deepfake1M .
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This was the case until at least 2017 when ISO and IEC jointly set up the ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42,9 a standardisation subcommittee (SC) focusing on AI under ISO/IEC JTC 1,10 the joint technical committee for standardising “information technology.””
From Deepfake: definitions, performance metrics and standards, datasets, and a meta-review (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 44 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Cai, Z., Ghosh, S., Adatia, A. P., Hayat, M., Dhall, A., Gedeon, T., & Stefanov, K.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Curtin University (AU)
- Indian Institute of Technology Ropar (IN)
- Qualcomm (United States) (US)
- Flinders University (AU)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 7414-7423
- arXiv
- 2311.15308
- OpenAlex
- W4403791323
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- deepfake detection, video manipulation, sound manipulation, synthetic dataset, large-scale datasets, data generation pipeline
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review