PreprintCited by 18Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDigital Media and Visual Art

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

LivePhoto: Real Image Animation with Text-guided Motion Control

Open access

Abstract

Despite the recent progress in text-to-video generation, existing studies usually overlook the issue that only spatial contents but not temporal motions in synthesized videos are under the control of text. Towards such a challenge, this work presents a practical system, named LivePhoto, which allows users to animate an image of their interest with text descriptions. We first establish a strong baseline that helps a well-learned text-to-image generator (i.e., Stable Diffusion) take an image as a further input. We then equip the improved generator with a motion module for temporal modeling and propose a carefully designed training pipeline to better link texts and motions. In particular, considering the facts that (1) text can only describe motions roughly (e.g., regardless of the moving speed) and (2) text may include both content and motion descriptions, we introduce a motion intensity estimation module as well as a text re-weighting module to reduce the ambiguity of text-to-motion mapping. Empirical evidence suggests that our approach is capable of well decoding motion-related textual instructions into videos, such as actions, camera movements, or even conjuring new contents from thin air (e.g., pouring water into an empty glass). Interestingly, thanks to the proposed intensity learning mechanism, our system offers users an additional control signal (i.e., the motion intensity) besides text for video customization.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2312.02928

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Features in the U-Net's self-attention layers can reflect the consistency of image appearance.

    “It is well known that the features in the U-Net's selfattention layers can reflect the consistency of image appearance.”

    From DiffSim: Taming Diffusion Models for Evaluating Visual Similarity (2024) · cites this paper as [8]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, X., Liu, Z., Chen, M., Feng, Y., Liu, Y., Shen, Y., & Zhao, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Alibaba Group (China) (CN)
  • Ant Group (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Hengshuang
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
Pages
475-491
ISSN
0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402952275
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.73
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Digital Media and Visual Art
Keywords
text-to-video generation, image animation, Stable Diffusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review