Building Domain-Specific LLMs Faithful To The Islamic Worldview: Mirage or Technical Possibility?
Open accessAbstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across numerous natural language understanding use cases. However, this impressive performance comes with inherent limitations, such as the tendency to perpetuate stereotypical biases or fabricate non-existent facts. In the context of Islam and its representation, accurate and factual representation of its beliefs and teachings rooted in the Quran and Sunnah is key. This work focuses on the challenge of building domain-specific LLMs faithful to the Islamic worldview and proposes ways to build and evaluate such systems. Firstly, we define this open-ended goal as a technical problem and propose various solutions. Subsequently, we critically examine known challenges inherent to each approach and highlight evaluation methodologies that can be used to assess such systems. This work highlights the need for high-quality datasets, evaluations, and interdisciplinary work blending machine learning with Islamic scholarship.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Peng, Baolin, Chunyuan Li, Pengcheng He, Michel Galley, and Jianfeng Gao. "Instruction tuning with gpt-4." arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03277 (2023). · arXiv
- Abid, A., Farooqi, M. & Zou, J. Large language models associate Muslims with violence. Nat Mach Intell 3, 461-463 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00359-2 · DOI
- Liang, P. P., Wu, C., Morency, L. P., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2021, July). Towards understanding and mitigating social biases in language models. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 6565-6576). PMLR.
- White, J., Fu, Q., Hays, S., Sandborn, M., Olea, C., Gilbert, H., ... & Schmidt, D. C. (2023). A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with chatgpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11382. · arXiv
- Zhang, T., Kishore, V., Wu, F., Weinberger, K. Q., & Artzi, Y. (2019). Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with bert. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.09675. · arXiv
- Liu, Y., Iter, D., Xu, Y., Wang, S., & Xu, R. (2023). G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment. ArXiv abs/2303.16634 (2023). · arXiv
- Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., ... & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval- augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 9459-9474.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sacred or Synthetic? Evaluating LLM Reliability and Abstention for Religious Questions
Atif, F., Askarbekuly, N., Darwish, K., & Choudhury, M. (2025) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1609/aies.v8i1.36543 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Patel, S., Kane, H., & Patel, R.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2312.06652
- OpenAlex
- W4389708920
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- domain-specific large language models, Islamic worldview, Quran and Sunnah, factual hallucination, Islamic scholarship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
