DreamTalk: When Emotional Talking Head Generation Meets Diffusion Probabilistic Models
Open accessAbstract
Emotional talking head generation has attracted growing attention. Previous methods, which are mainly GAN-based, still struggle to consistently produce satisfactory results across diverse emotions and cannot conveniently specify personalized emotions. In this work, we leverage powerful diffusion models to address the issue and propose DreamTalk, a framework that employs meticulous design to unlock the potential of diffusion models in generating emotional talking heads. Specifically, DreamTalk consists of three crucial components: a denoising network, a style-aware lip expert, and a style predictor. The diffusion-based denoising network can consistently synthesize high-quality audio-driven face motions across diverse emotions. To enhance lip-motion accuracy and emotional fullness, we introduce a style-aware lip expert that can guide lip-sync while preserving emotion intensity. To more conveniently specify personalized emotions, a diffusion-based style predictor is utilized to predict the personalized emotion directly from the audio, eliminating the need for extra emotion reference. By this means, DreamTalk can consistently generate vivid talking faces across diverse emotions and conveniently specify personalized emotions. Extensive experiments validate DreamTalk's effectiveness and superiority. The code is available at https://github.com/ali-vilab/dreamtalk.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pioneer talking-head generation works typically utilize biometric signals such as facial keypoints or 3D priors as intermediate motion representation to animate the reference face while ensuring lip synchronization.
“pioneer talking-head generation works typically utilize biometric signals such as facial keypoints [22, 28, 30, 45], or 3D priors [11, 13, 16, 23, 32, 43, 44] as intermediate motion representation to animate the reference face while ensuring lip synchronization.”
From MoCha: Towards Movie-Grade Talking Character Synthesis (2025) · cites this paper as [23]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MoCha: Towards Movie-Grade Talking Character Synthesis
Wei, C., Sun, B., Ma, H., Hou, J., Juefei-Xu, F., He, Z., Dai, X., Zhang, L., Li, K., Hou, T., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.23307
“…audio sequence and a reference face, pioneer talking-head generation works typically utilize biometric signals such as facial keypoints [22, 28, 30, 45], or 3D priors [11, 13, 16, 23, 32, 43, 44] as intermediate motion representation to animate the reference face while ensuring lip synchronization.”
- Authors
- Ma, Y., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Wang, X., Zhang, Y., & Deng, Z.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2312.09767
- OpenAlex
- W4389911993
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 10 · 2024: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- diffusion probabilistic models, audio-driven face animation, lip synchronization, emotional intensity, denoising network
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review