The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Retrieval-Augmented Egocentric Video Captioning
Open accessAbstract
Understanding human actions from videos of first-person view poses significant challenges. Most prior approaches explore representation learning on egocentric videos only, while overlooking the potential benefit of exploiting existing large-scale third-person videos. In this paper, (1) we develop EgoInstructor, a retrieval-augmented multimodal captioning model that automatically retrieves semantically relevant third-person instructional videos to enhance the video captioning of egocentric videos. (2) For training the cross-view retrieval module, we devise an automatic pipeline to discover ego-exo video pairs from distinct large-scale egocentric and exocentric datasets. (3) We train the cross-view retrieval module with a novel EgoExoNCE loss that pulls egocentric and exocentric video features closer by aligning them to shared text features that describe similar actions. (4) Through extensive experiments, our cross-view retrieval module demonstrates superior performance across seven benchmarks. Regarding egocentric video captioning, EgoInstructor exhibits significant improvements by leveraging third-person videos as references. Project page is available at: https://jazzcharles.github.io/Egoinstructor/
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“AI long-term memory serves various purposes: it records episodic information from past events [189, 187], learns semantic information [182, 9], and gains experience from observations or feedback [188, 244].”
From Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory (2024) · cites this paper as [189]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, some video understanding systems improve their performance by integrating external information sources (semantic memory), such as video clip captions [9] and related videos [189].”
From Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory (2024) · cites this paper as [189]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory
He, Z., Lin, W., Zheng, H., Zhang, F., Jones, M. W., Aitchison, L., Xu, X., Liu, M., Kristensson, P. O., & Shen, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.00489 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, J., Huang, Y., Hou, J., Chen, G., Zhang, Y., Feng, R., & Xie, W.
- Affiliations
- Fudan University (CN)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Nanjing University (CN)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 13525-13536
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2401.00789
- OpenAlex
- W4402754020
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Analysis and Summarization
- Keywords
- retrieval-augmented generation, multimodal captioning, human action understanding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review