Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 57Cryptography and Data SecurityQuantum Information and CryptographyCryptography and Residue Arithmetic

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Cybersecurity in Critical Infrastructures: A Post-Quantum Cryptography Perspective

Open access

Abstract

The machinery of industrial environments was connected to the Internet years ago with the scope of increasing their performance. However, this change made such environments vulnerable against cyber-attacks that can compromise their correct functioning resulting in economic or social problems. Moreover, implementing cryptosystems in the communications between operational technology (OT) devices is a more challenging task than for information technology (IT) environments since the OT networks are generally composed of legacy elements, characterized by low-computational capabilities. Consequently, implementing cryptosystems in industrial communication networks faces a trade-off between the security of the communications and the amortization of the industrial infrastructure. Critical Infrastructure (CI) refers to the industries which provide key resources for the daily social and economical development, e.g. electricity. Furthermore, a new threat to cybersecurity has arisen with the theoretical proposal of quantum computers, due to their potential ability of breaking state-of-the-art cryptography protocols, such as RSA or ECC. Many global agents have become aware that transitioning their secure communications to a quantum secure paradigm is a priority that should be established before the arrival of fault-tolerance. In this paper, we aim to describe the problematic of implementing post-quantum cryptography (PQC) to CI environments. For doing so, we describe the requirements for these scenarios and how they differ against IT. We also introduce classical cryptography and how quantum computers pose a threat to such security protocols. Furthermore, we introduce state-of-the-art proposals of PQC protocols and present their characteristics. We conclude by discussing the problematic of integrating PQC in industrial environments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2401.03780

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Metadata

Authors
del Moral, J. O., iOlius, A. D., Vidal, G., Crespo, P. M., & Martinez, J. E.
Affiliations
Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Volume
11
Issue
18
Pages
30217-30244
ISSN
2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399416003
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 8
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Deposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (PID2022-137099NB-C44)
  • Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Keywords
post-quantum cryptography, critical infrastructure cybersecurity, industrial control systems, operational technology networks, quantum computing threats, legacy devices, classical cryptography, industrial communication security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.