The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Sparse Meets Dense: A Hybrid Approach to Enhance Scientific Document Retrieval
Open accessAbstract
Traditional information retrieval is based on sparse bag-of-words vector representations of documents and queries. More recent deep-learning approaches have used dense embeddings learned using a transformer-based large language model. We show that on a classic benchmark on scientific document retrieval in the medical domain of cystic fibrosis, that both of these models perform roughly equivalently. Notably, dense vectors from the state-of-the-art SPECTER2 model do not significantly enhance performance. However, a hybrid model that we propose combining these methods yields significantly better results, underscoring the merits of integrating classical and contemporary deep learning techniques in information retrieval in the domain of specialized scientific documents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Based on our review of existing work, we identify two primary retrieval methods suitable for non-parametric memory including sparse methods based on bag-of-words models and dense methods based on deep representation learning for vector encoding and relevance score calculation [269, 270, 232, 271].”
From Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory (2024) · cites this paper as [271]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, H. Schütze, Introduction to Information Retrieval, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.
- V. Karpukhin, B. Oguz, S. Min, L. Wu, S. Edunov, D. Chen, W. Yih, Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering, EMNLP (2020). URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04906. arXiv:2004.04906. · arXiv
- A. Cohan, S. Feldman, I. Beltagy, D. Downey, D. S. Weld, SPECTER: document- level representation learning using citation-informed transformers, ACL (2020). arXiv:2004.07180. · arXiv
- A. Singh, M. D'Arcy, A. Cohan, D. Downey, S. Feldman, SciRepEval: A multi-format benchmark for scientific document representations, 2023. arXiv:2211.13308. · arXiv
- G. Salton, M. J. McGill, Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1983.
- Q. Le, T. Mikolov, Distributed representations of sentences and documents, Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2014).
- A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, I. Polo- sukhin, Attention is all you need, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2017).
- J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, K. Toutanova, Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding, Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (2019).
- M. G. Arivazhagan, L. Liu, P. Qi, X. Chen, W. Y. Wang, Z. Huang, Hybrid hierarchi- cal retrieval for open-domain question answering, in: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL, 2023.
- Y. Luan, J. Eisenstein, K. Toutanova, M. Collins, Sparse, Dense, and Attentional Represen- tations for Text Retrieval, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL) (2021).
- R. Baeza-Yates, B. Ribeiro-Neto, Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press, New York, 1999.
- K. Järvelin, J. Kekäläinen, Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques, ACM Transactions on Information Systems 20 (2002).
- I. Beltagy, K. Lo, A. Cohan, SciBERT: A pretrained language model for scientific text, EMNLP (2019). arXiv:1903.10676. · arXiv
- AI2, Semantic scholar, www.semanticscholar.org (2015).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory
He, Z., Lin, W., Zheng, H., Zhang, F., Jones, M. W., Aitchison, L., Xu, X., Liu, M., Kristensson, P. O., & Shen, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.00489 · Cited by 3
“Based on our review of existing work, we identify two primary retrieval methods suitable for non-parametric memory including sparse methods based on bag-of-words models and dense methods based on deep representation learning for vector encoding and relevance score calculation [263, 264, 226, 265].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Mandikal, P., & Mooney, R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2401.04055
- OpenAlex
- W4390723217
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
- Keywords
- scientific document retrieval, hybrid retrieval model, dense embeddings, large language models, medical information retrieval, cystic fibrosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
