ORGANA: A Robotic Assistant for Automated Chemistry Experimentation and Characterization
Open accessAbstract
Chemistry experiments can be resource- and labor-intensive, often requiring manual tasks like polishing electrodes in electrochemistry. Traditional lab automation infrastructure faces challenges adapting to new experiments. To address this, we introduce ORGANA, an assistive robotic system that automates diverse chemistry experiments using decision-making and perception tools. It makes decisions with chemists in the loop to control robots and lab devices. ORGANA interacts with chemists using Large Language Models (LLMs) to derive experiment goals, handle disambiguation, and provide experiment logs. ORGANA plans and executes complex tasks with visual feedback, while supporting scheduling and parallel task execution. We demonstrate ORGANA's capabilities in solubility, pH measurement, recrystallization, and electrochemistry experiments. In electrochemistry, it executes a 19-step plan in parallel to characterize quinone derivatives for flow batteries. Our user study shows ORGANA reduces frustration and physical demand by over 50%, with users saving an average of 80.3% of their time when using it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Organa achieved results comparable to human chemists while reducing execution time by over 20% in electrochemistry.
“In electrochemistry, it demonstrated the automation of complex processes, such as electrode polishing and redox potential measurement, achieving results comparable to human chemists while reducing execution time by over 20%.”
From Agentic AI for Scientific Discovery: A Survey of Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as Darvish et al., 2024
Cites
DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection
Zhang, H., Li, F., Liu, S., Zhang, L., Su, H., Zhu, J., Ni, L. M., & Shum, H.-Y. (2022) · arXiv · Cited by 1,154 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Firstly, we employed GroundDINO [44], a transformer-based zero-shot object detection model [45] with grounded pre-training.”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Self-Driving Laboratories for Chemistry and Materials Science
Tom, G., Schmid, S. P., Baird, S. G., Cao, Y., Darvish, K., Hao, H., Lo, S., Pablo-García, S., Rajaonson, E. M., Skreta, M., et al. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00055 · Cited by 707 · see citing works
Self-citationA review of large language models and autonomous agents in chemistry
Ramos, M. C., Collison, C. J., & White, A. D. (2025) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d4sc03921a · Cited by 274 · see citing works
A Multiagent-Driven Robotic AI Chemist Enabling Autonomous Chemical Research On Demand
Song, T., Luo, M., Zhang, X., Chen, L., Huang, Y., Cao, J., Zhu, Q., Liu, D., Zhang, B., Zou, G., et al. (2025) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.4c17738 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Agentic AI for Scientific Discovery: A Survey of Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions
Gridach, M., Nanavati, J., Abidine, K. Z. E., Mendes, L., & Mack, C. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.08979 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Darvish, K., Skreta, M., Zhao, Y., Yoshikawa, N., Som, S., Bogdanovic, M., Cao, Y., Hao, H., Xu, H., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Garg, A., & Shkurti, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Darvish, Kourosh
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101897-101897
- ISSN
- 2590-2385 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2401.06949
- OpenAlex
- W4404266811
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 62 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 15
- FWCI
- 28.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Matter (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- University of Toronto (CFREF-2022-00042)
- Canada First Research Excellence Fund (2022-00042, CFREF-2022-00042)
- Vector Institute
- Natural Resources Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Various Chemistry Research Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Keywords
- large language models, human-in-the-loop control, electrode polishing, electrochemistry, solubility measurement, pH measurement, recrystallization, flow batteries, quinone derivatives, task planning, parallel task execution, user study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review