Subjective Causality
Open accessAbstract
We show that it is possible to understand and identify a decision maker's subjective causal judgements by observing her preferences over interventions. Following Pearl [2000], we represent causality using causal models (also called structural equations models), where the world is described by a collection of variables, related by equations. We show that if a preference relation over interventions satisfies certain axioms (related to standard axioms regarding counterfactuals), then we can define (i) a causal model, (ii) a probability capturing the decision-maker's uncertainty regarding the external factors in the world and (iii) a utility on outcomes such that each intervention is associated with an expected utility and such that intervention $A$ is preferred to $B$ iff the expected utility of $A$ is greater than that of $B$. In addition, we characterize when the causal model is unique. Thus, our results allow a modeler to test the hypothesis that a decision maker's preferences are consistent with some causal model and to identify causal judgements from observed behavior.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Representation theorems such as Savage (1972) and Halpern & Piermont (2024) establish that agents satisfying certain rationality axioms behave as if they are maximizing the expected value of a utility function with respect to a world model.
“Representation theorems such as Savage (1972) and Halpern & Piermont (2024), establish that agents satisfying certain rationality axioms behave as if they are maximizing the expected value of a utility function with respect to a world model.”
From General agents contain world models (2025) · cites this paper as Halpern & Piermont (2024)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Y. Alexander and I. Gilboa. Subjective causality. Revue économique, 74(4):619-633, 2023.
- J. D. Angrist and J.-S. Pischke. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Compan- ion. Princeton University Press, 2009.
- A. Bjorndahl and J. Y. Halpern. Language-based decisions. In Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge: Proc. Eighteenth Conference (TARK 2021). 2021. The proceedings are pub- lished as Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science.
- A. Bjorndahl and J. Y. Halpern. Sequential language-based decisions. In Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge: Proc. Nineteenth Conference (TARK 2023). 2023. The proceedings are published as Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science.
- L. E. Blume, D. Easley, and J. Y. Halpern. Connstructive decision theory. Journal of Eco- nomic Theory, 196, 2021. An earlier version, entitled "Re- doing the Foundations of Decision Theory", appears in Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proc. Tenth International Conference (KR '06).
- S. Cunningham. Causal Inference: The Mixtape. Yale university press, 2021.
- Andrew Ellis and Heidi Christina Thysen. Subjective causality in choice. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05957, 2021. [Galles and Pearl, 1998] · arXiv
- D. Galles and J. Pearl. An ax- iomatic characterization of causal counterfactuals. Foun- dation of Science, 3(1):151-182, 1998.
- J. Y. Halpern. Axiomatizing causal reason- ing. Journal of A.I. Research, 12:317-337, 2000.
- J. Y. Halpern. From causal models to possible-worlds models of counterfactuals. Review of Sym- bolic Logic, 6(2):81-101, 2013.
- D. Lewis. Counterfactuals. Harvard Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, MA, 1973.
- M. Machina and D. Schmeidler. A more robust definition of subjec- tive probability. Econometrica, 60(2):745-780, 1992.
- S. Morgan and C. Winship. Counterfactuals and Causal inference. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2007.
- M. Parascandola and D. L. Weed. Causation in epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiol- ogy & Community Health, 55(12):905-912, 2001.
- J. Pearl. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000.
- R. K. Plowright, S. H. Sokolow, M. E. Gorman, P. Daszak, and J. E. Foley. Causal infer- ence in disease ecology: investigating ecological drivers of disease emergence. Frontiers in Ecology and the Envi- ronment, 6(8):420-429, 2008.
- P. Schenone. Causality: a decision theoretic foundation. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.07414, 2020. · arXiv
- H. A. Simon. Causal ordering and identifia- bility. In W. C. Hood and T. C. Koopmans, editors, Stud- ies in Econometric Methods, Cowles Commission for Re- search in Economics, Monograph No. 14, pages 49-74. Wiley, New York, 1953.
- P. Spirtes, C. Glymour, and R. Scheines. Causation, Prediction, and Search. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993.
- R. C. Stalnaker. A theory of conditionals. In N. Rescher, editor, Studies in Logical Theory, pages 98- 112.
- Blackwell, Oxford, U.K., 1968.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
General agents contain world models
Richens, J., Abel, D., Bellot, A., & Everitt, T. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01622 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Halpern, J. Y., & Piermont, E.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- arXiv
- 2401.10937
- OpenAlex
- W4391157357
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
- Locations
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (public-domain)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- causal models, structural equation modeling, expected utility, counterfactual reasoning, decision making under uncertainty, preference axioms, utility representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
