The DOI matches its DataCite record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NEUROSEC: FPGA-Based Neuromorphic Audio Security
Open accessAbstract
Neuromorphic systems, inspired by the complexity and functionality of the human brain, have gained interest in academic and industrial attention due to their unparalleled potential across a wide range of applications. While their capabilities herald innovation, it is imperative to underscore that these computational paradigms, analogous to their traditional counterparts, are not impervious to security threats. Although the exploration of neuromorphic methodologies for image and video processing has been rigorously pursued, the realm of neuromorphic audio processing remains in its early stages. Our results highlight the robustness and precision of our FPGA-based neuromorphic system. Specifically, our system showcases a commendable balance between desired signal and background noise, efficient spike rate encoding, and unparalleled resilience against adversarial attacks such as FGSM and PGD. A standout feature of our framework is its detection rate of 94%, which, when compared to other methodologies, underscores its greater capability in identifying and mitigating threats within 5.39 dB, a commendable SNR ratio. Furthermore, neuromorphic computing and hardware security serve many sensor domains in mission-critical and privacy-preserving applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“field-programmable neuromorphic chips have already clocked > 94% detection rates in noisy, real-world conditions”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Isik et al. 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Characterizing Audio Adversarial Examples Using Temporal DependencyPreprint
Yang, Z., Li, B., Chen, P., & Song, D. X. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.10875 · Cited by 122
Implementing Spiking Neural Networks on Neuromorphic Architectures: A ReviewPreprint
Huynh, P. K., Varshika, M. L., Paul, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.08897 · Cited by 23
A Survey of Spiking Neural Network Accelerator on FPGAPreprint
Işık, M. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.03910 · Cited by 11
An Energy-Efficient Neural Network Accelerator with Improved Protections Against Fault-Attacks
Maji, S., Lee, K., Gongye, C., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of ESSCIRC · doi:10.1109/esscirc59616.2023.10268746 · Cited by 5
NNSplitter: An Active Defense Solution for DNN Model via Automated Weight ObfuscationPreprint
Zhou, T., Luo, Y., Ren, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.00097 · Cited by 1
Fault Injection in Native Logic-in-Memory Computation on Neuromorphic Hardware
Staudigl, F., Fetz, T., Pelke, R., et al. (2023) · RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.07655
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Bu, T., Ding, J., Hao, Z., Yu, Z.: Rate gradient approximation attack threats deep spiking neu- ral networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 7896-7906 (2023)
- Chen, X., Li, S., Huang, H.: Adversarial attack and defense on deep neural network-based voice processing systems: An overview. Applied Sciences 11(18), 8450 (2021)
- Galán, D.G.: Neuromorphic auditory computing: towards a digital, event-based implementa- tion of the hearing sense for robotics. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de Sevilla (2022)
- Giannakopoulos, P., Pikrakis, A., Cotronis, Y.: Improving post-processing of audio event de- tectors using reinforcement learning. IEEE Access 10, 84398-84404 (2022)
- Gongye, C., Luo, Y., Xu, X., Fei, Y.: Hammerdodger: A lightweight defense framework against rowhammer attack on dnns. In: 2023 60th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC). pp. 1-6. IEEE (2023)
- Inadagbo, K., Arig, B., Alici, N., Isik, M.: Exploiting fpga capabilities for accelerated biomed- ical computing. In: 2023 Signal Processing: Algorithms, Architectures, Arrangements, and Applications (SPA). pp. 48-53. IEEE (2023)
- Isik, M., Inadagbo, K.: Astrocyte-integrated dynamic function exchange in spiking neural networks. In: International Conference on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems. pp. 263- 273. Springer (2023)
- Isik, M., Paul, A., Varshika, M.L., Das, A.: A design methodology for fault-tolerant computing using astrocyte neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers. pp. 169-172 (2022)
- Jia, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, G., Yang, X., Zhang, T., Zheng, J., Xu, D., Wang, H., Zheng, R., Pareek, S., et al.: Xvdpu: A high performance cnn accelerator on the versal platform powered by the ai engine. In: 2022 32nd International Conference on Field-Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL). pp. 01-09. IEEE (2022)
- Kwon, H., Yoon, H., Park, K.W.: Poster: Detecting audio adversarial example through au- dio modification. In: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security. pp. 2521-2523 (2019)
- Liu, B., Yang, C., Li, H., Chen, Y., Wu, Q., Barnell, M.: Security of neuromorphic systems: Challenges and solutions. In: 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). pp. 1326-1329. IEEE (2016)
- Madden, K., Harkin, J., McDaid, L., Nugent, C.: Adding security to networks-on-chip using neural networks. In: 2018 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). pp. 1299-1306. IEEE (2018)
- Marchisio, A., Pira, G., Martina, M., Masera, G., Shafique, M.: Dvs-attacks: Adversarial attacks on dynamic vision sensors for spiking neural networks. In: 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). pp. 1-9. IEEE (2021)
- Merchant, F.: Security as an important ingredient in neuromorphic engineering. In: 2022 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI). pp. 314-319. IEEE (2022)
- Peng, H., Zhou, S., Luo, Y., Xu, N., Duan, S., Ran, R., Zhao, J., Wang, C., Geng, T., Wen, W., et al.: Pasnet: Polynomial architecture search framework for two-party computation-based secure neural network deployment. In: 2023 60th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC). pp. 1-6. IEEE (2023)
- Perryman, N., Wilson, C., George, A.: Evaluation of xilinx versal architecture for next-gen edge computing in space. In: 2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference. pp. 1-11. IEEE (2023)
- Salehi, S., Sheaves, T., Gubbi, K.I., Beheshti, S.A., PD, S.M., Rafatirad, S., Sasan, A., Mohs- enin, T., Homayoun, H.: Neuromorphic-enabled security for iot. In: 2022 20th IEEE Interre- gional NEWCAS Conference (NEWCAS). pp. 153-157. IEEE (2022)
- Sepulveda, J., Reinbrecht, C., Diguet, J.P.: Security aspects of neuromorphic mpsocs. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD). pp. 1-6. IEEE (2018)
- Tayarani-Najaran, M.H., Schmuker, M.: Event-based sensing and signal processing in the visual, auditory, and olfactory domain: A review. Frontiers in Neural Circuits 15, 610446 (2021)
- Yang, C.H., Qi, J., Chen, P.Y., Ma, X., Lee, C.H.: Characterizing speech adversarial examples using self-attention u-net enhancement. In: ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). pp. 3107-3111. IEEE (2020)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation
Zsebők, S. (2026) · Biologia Futura · doi:10.1007/s42977-026-00322-5
Metadata
- Authors
- Isik, M., Vishwamith, H., Sur, Y., Inadagbo, K., & Dikmen, I. C.
- Affiliations
- Drexel University (US)
- University of Moratuwa (LK)
- Abdullah Gül University (TR)
- Prairie View A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Isik, Murat
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 134-147
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2401.12055
- OpenAlex
- W4392667931
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
- Keywords
- FPGA implementation, adversarial robustness, FGSM attacks, PGD attacks, hardware security, neuromorphic computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NEUROSEC: FPGA-Based Neuromorphic Audio Security. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2401.12055
- The paper
- Isik, M., Vishwamith, H., Sur, Y., Inadagbo, K., & Dikmen, I. C. (2024). NEUROSEC: FPGA-Based Neuromorphic Audio Security. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2401.12055
