The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Developing ChemDFM as a large language foundation model for chemistry
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102523
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has played an increasingly important role in chemical research. However, most models currently used in chemistry are specialist models that require training and tuning for specific tasks. A more generic and efficient solution would be an AI model that could address many tasks and support free-form dialogue in the broad field of chemistry. In its utmost form, such a generalist AI chemist could be referred to as Chemical General Intelligence. Large language models (LLMs) have recently logged tremendous success in the general domain of natural language processing, showing emerging task generalization and free-form dialogue capabilities. However, domain knowledge of chemistry is largely missing when training general-domain LLMs. The lack of such knowledge greatly hinders the performance of generalist LLMs in the field of chemistry. To this end, we develop ChemDFM, a pioneering LLM for chemistry trained on 34B tokens from chemical literature and textbooks, and fine-tuned using 2.7M instructions. As a result, it can understand and reason with chemical knowledge in free-form dialogue. Quantitative evaluations show that ChemDFM significantly surpasses most representative open-source LLMs. It outperforms GPT-4 on a great portion of chemical tasks, despite the substantial size difference. We have open-sourced the inference codes, evaluation datasets, and model weights of ChemDFM on Huggingface (https://huggingface.co/OpenDFM/ChemDFM-v1.0-13B).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In science, some existing works design LLM-based agents with a large amount of knowledge in memory to solve problems.
“In the domain of science, some existing works design LLM-based agents with a large amount of knowledge in memory to solve problems [158, 160, 162].”
From A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model-based Agents (2025) · cites this paper as [160]
The Domain Pre-training section describes equipping an LLM with extensive chemical knowledge, and the LLM-Based Research Assistant section says ChemDFM integrates memory-based knowledge to answer chemistry questions. The paper presents ChemDFM as a specialist LLM and research assistant, however, not as an LLM-based agent with a distinct memory architecture; that characterization is not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When LLMs meet cybersecurity: a systematic literature review
Zhang, J., Bu, H., Wen, H., Liu, Y., Fei, H., Xi, R., Li, L., Yang, Y., Zhu, H., & Meng, D. (2025) · Cybersecurity · doi:10.1186/s42400-025-00361-w · Cited by 383
A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model-based Agents
Zhang, Z., Dai, Q., Bo, X., Ma, C., Li, R., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Dong, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3748302 · Cited by 592
Self-citationKARMA: Augmenting Embodied AI Agents with Long-and-Short Term Memory Systems
Wang, Z., Yu, B., Zhao, J., Sun, W., Hou, S., Liang, S., Hu, X., Han, Y., & Gan, Y. (2025) · 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11128047 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Z., Ma, D., Chen, L., Sun, L., Li, Z., Xia, Y., Chen, B., Xu, H., Zhu, Z., Zhu, S., Fan, S., Shen, G., Yu, K., & Chen, X.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Lu
- Yu, Kai
- Chen, Xin
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 102523-102523
- ISSN
- 2666-3864 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2401.14818
- OpenAlex
- W4409485028
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 17.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Reports Physical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U23B2057, 92370206, 62120106006, 62106142, 2021SHZDZX0102)
- Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (2021 SHZDZX0102)
- National Science and Technology Major Project
- National Major Science and Technology Projects of China (2023ZD0120703)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- large language models, chemical language models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review