CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 2Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsNatural Language Processing TechniquesGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

Skip \n: A Simple Method to Reduce Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models

Open access
Han, Zongbo, Bai, Zechen, Mei, Haiyang, Xu, Qianli, Zhang, Changqing, Shou, Mike Zheng·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2402.01345arXiv 2402.01345
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Recent advancements in large vision-language models (LVLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in visual information understanding with human language. Despite these advances, LVLMs still face challenges with multimodal hallucination, such as generating text descriptions of objects that are not present in the visual information. However, the underlying fundamental reasons of multimodal hallucinations remain poorly explored. In this paper, we propose a new perspective, suggesting that the inherent biases in LVLMs might be a key factor in hallucinations. Specifically, we systematically identify a semantic shift bias related to paragraph breaks (\n\n), where the content before and after '\n\n' in the training data frequently exhibit significant semantic changes. This pattern leads the model to infer that the contents following '\n\n' should be obviously different from the preceding contents with less hallucinatory descriptions, thereby increasing the probability of hallucinatory descriptions subsequent to the '\n\n'. We have validated this hypothesis on multiple publicly available LVLMs. Besides, we find that deliberately inserting '\n\n' at the generated description can induce more hallucinations. A simple method is proposed to effectively mitigate the hallucination of LVLMs by skipping the output of '\n'.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2402.01345

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hallucinations can arise from biased or insufficient training data and inherent architectural limitations of LLMs.

    “Hallucinations can arise from various factors, including biased or insufficient training data (Han et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2024c), and inherent architectural limitations of LLMs (Leng et al., 2023; Kalai and Vempala, 2024).”

    From MedHallu: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Detecting Medical Hallucinations in Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Han et al., 2024

    The Introduction links hallucinations in large vision-language models to a semantic-shift bias associated with patterns in their training data. It does not identify insufficient training data as a cause. The sentence cites other works for architectural limitations, so that part is not assessed against Han et al. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Ale- man, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023. · arXiv
  2. Assaf Ben-Kish, Moran Yanuka, Morris Alper, Raja Giryes, and Hadar Averbuch-Elor. Mocha: Multi-objective reinforcement mitigating caption hallucinations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.03631, 2023. · arXiv
  3. Mariusz Bojarski, Davide Del Testa, Daniel Dworakowski, Bernhard Firner, Beat Flepp, Prasoon Goyal, Lawrence D Jackel, Mathew Monfort, Urs Muller, Jiakai Zhang, et al. End to end learning for self-driving cars. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.07316, 2016. · arXiv
  4. Jun Chen, Deyao Zhu, Xiaoqian Shen, Xiang Li, Zechun Liu, Pengchuan Zhang, Raghuraman Krishnamoorthi, Vikas Chandra, Yunyang Xiong, and Mohamed Elhoseiny. Minigpt-v2: large language model as a unified interface for vision-language multi-task learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.09478, 2023. · arXiv
  5. Yung-Sung Chuang, Yujia Xie, Hongyin Luo, Yoon Kim, James Glass, and Pengcheng He. Dola: Decoding by contrasting layers improves factuality in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.03883, 2023. · arXiv
  6. Chenhang Cui, Yiyang Zhou, Xinyu Yang, Shirley Wu, Linjun Zhang, James Zou, and Huaxiu Yao. Holistic analysis of hallucination in gpt-4v (ision): Bias and interference challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.03287, 2023. · arXiv
  7. Yanai Elazar, Akshita Bhagia, Ian Magnusson, Abhilasha Ravichander, Dustin Schwenk, Alane Suhr, Pete Walsh, Dirk Groeneveld, Luca Soldaini, Sameer Singh, et al. What's in my big data? arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.20707, 2023. · arXiv
  8. Andre Esteva, Brett Kuprel, Roberto A Novoa, Justin Ko, Susan M Swetter, Helen M Blau, and Sebastian Thrun. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. nature, 542(7639):115-118, 2017.
  9. Alex Graves. Sequence transduction with recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.3711, 2012. · arXiv
  10. Zongbo Han, Zhipeng Liang, Fan Yang, Liu Liu, Lanqing Li, Yatao Bian, Peilin Zhao, Bingzhe Wu, Changqing Zhang, and Jianhua Yao. Umix: Improving importance weighting for subpopula- tion shift via uncertainty-aware mixup. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35: 37704-37718, 2022.
  11. Zongbo Han, Zhipeng Liang, Fan Yang, Liu Liu, Lanqing Li, Yatao Bian, Peilin Zhao, Qinghua Hu, Bingzhe Wu, Changqing Zhang, et al. Reweighted mixup for subpopulation shift. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.04148, 2023. · arXiv
  12. Qidong Huang, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan zhang, Bin Wang, Conghui He, Jiaqi Wang, Dahua Lin, Weiming Zhang, and Nenghai Yu. Opera: Alleviating hallucination in multi-modal large language models via over-trust penalty and retrospection-allocation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17911, 2023. · arXiv
  13. Sicong Leng, Hang Zhang, Guanzheng Chen, Xin Li, Shijian Lu, Chunyan Miao, and Lidong Bing. Mitigating object hallucinations in large vision-language models through visual contrastive de- coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16922, 2023. · arXiv
  14. Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, and Steven Hoi. Blip-2: Bootstrapping language- image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12597, 2023. · arXiv
  15. Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13, pp. 740-755. Springer, 2014.
  16. Yiqi Lin, Conghui He, Alex Jinpeng Wang, Bin Wang, Weijia Li, and Mike Zheng Shou. Parrot captions teach clip to spot text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.14232, 2023. · arXiv
  17. Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, and Yong Jae Lee. Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03744, 2023a. · arXiv
  18. Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. Visual instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08485, 2023b. · arXiv
  19. Zhuang Liu and Kaiming He. A decade's battle on dataset bias: Are we there yet? arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08632, 2024. · arXiv
  20. Shayne Longpre, Gregory Yauney, Emily Reif, Katherine Lee, Adam Roberts, Barret Zoph, Denny Zhou, Jason Wei, Kevin Robinson, David Mimno, et al. A pretrainer's guide to training data: Measuring the effects of data age, domain coverage, quality, & toxicity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13169, 2023. · arXiv
  21. Anna Rohrbach, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Kaylee Burns, Trevor Darrell, and Kate Saenko. Object hallucination in image captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.02156, 2018. · arXiv
  22. Zhiqing Sun, Sheng Shen, Shengcao Cao, Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yikang Shen, Chuang Gan, Liang-Yan Gui, Yu-Xiong Wang, Yiming Yang, et al. Aligning large multimodal models with factually augmented rlhf. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.14525, 2023. · arXiv
  23. Shengbang Tong, Zhuang Liu, Yuexiang Zhai, Yi Ma, Yann LeCun, and Saining Xie. Eyes wide shut? exploring the visual shortcomings of multimodal llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.06209, 2024. · arXiv
  24. Antonio Torralba and Alexei A Efros. Unbiased look at dataset bias. In CVPR 2011, pp. 1521-1528. IEEE, 2011.
  25. Bin Wang, Fan Wu, Xiao Han, Jiahui Peng, Huaping Zhong, Pan Zhang, Xiaoyi Dong, Weijia Li, Wei Li, Jiaqi Wang, et al. Vigc: Visual instruction generation and correction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12714, 2023a. · arXiv
  26. Junyang Wang, Yiyang Zhou, Guohai Xu, Pengcheng Shi, Chenlin Zhao, Haiyang Xu, Qinghao Ye, Ming Yan, Ji Zhang, Jihua Zhu, et al. Evaluation and analysis of hallucination in large vision- language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15126, 2023b. · arXiv
  27. Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, Rémi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, et al. Huggingface's transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03771, 2019. · arXiv
  28. Tianyu Yu, Yuan Yao, Haoye Zhang, Taiwen He, Yifeng Han, Ganqu Cui, Jinyi Hu, Zhiyuan Liu, Hai-Tao Zheng, Maosong Sun, et al. Rlhf-v: Towards trustworthy mllms via behavior alignment from fine-grained correctional human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00849, 2023. · arXiv
  29. Bohan Zhai, Shijia Yang, Chenfeng Xu, Sheng Shen, Kurt Keutzer, and Manling Li. Halle-switch: Controlling object hallucination in large vision language models. arXiv e-prints, pp. arXiv-2310, 2023.
  30. Linxi Zhao, Yihe Deng, Weitong Zhang, and Quanquan Gu. Mitigating object hallucination in large vision-language models via classifier-free guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.08680, 2024. · arXiv
  31. Zhiyuan Zhao, Bin Wang, Linke Ouyang, Xiaoyi Dong, Jiaqi Wang, and Conghui He. Beyond hal- lucinations: Enhancing lvlms through hallucination-aware direct preference optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16839, 2023. · arXiv
  32. Yiyang Zhou, Chenhang Cui, Jaehong Yoon, Linjun Zhang, Zhun Deng, Chelsea Finn, Mohit Bansal, and Huaxiu Yao. Analyzing and mitigating object hallucination in large vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.00754, 2023. · arXiv
  33. Deyao Zhu, Jun Chen, Xiaoqian Shen, Xiang Li, and Mohamed Elhoseiny. Minigpt-4: En- hancing vision-language understanding with advanced large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10592, 2023. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, Z., Bai, Z., Mei, H., Xu, Q., Zhang, C., & Shou, M. Z.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Institute for Infocomm Research (SG)
  • Tianjin University (CN)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2402.01345
arXiv
2402.01345
OpenAlex
W4391556011
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
multimodal hallucination, large vision-language models, hallucination mitigation, training data bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review