PreprintCited by 1Topic ModelingInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HiQA: A Hierarchical Contextual Augmentation RAG for Multi-Documents QA

Open access

Abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) significantly improves document-based question answering by integrating external documents during generation. However, retrieval accuracy can degrade when the knowledge base contains many semantically and structurally similar documents. We introduce HiQA, a practical hierarchical contextual augmentation framework for multi-document question answering (MDQA). HiQA enriches text chunks with cascading document metadata, such as document titles and section paths, so that retrieval can use both local content and document structure. The framework also uses a multi-route retriever that combines semantic, lexical, and keyword/entity signals. We further introduce MasQA, a benchmark designed to evaluate MDQA systems in realistic similar-document settings. Experiments show that HiQA improves retrieval and answer quality on MasQA and remains competitive on public MDQA benchmarks, while its benefits are strongest for structured, domain-specific, highly similar document collections.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2402.01767

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The hierarchical organization from episodes to facts to entities to communities extends existing hierarchical RAG strategies.

    “The resulting hierarchical organization-from episodes to facts to entities to communities-extends existing hierarchical RAG strategies [10][11].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, X., Gao, P., Song, J., Chen, X., & Tan, X.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391591673
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
multi-document question answering, retrieval-augmented generation, document metadata, document structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review